Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T10:30:27.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of powerful retarding additive synergies on the kinetic profile of cementitious mineralogical transformations at high temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2019

Peter J. Boul ,
Diana K. Rasner ,
Kenneth D. Johnson  and
Carl J. Thaemlitz
Peter J. Boul*
Affiliation:
Aramco Services Company, Aramco Research Center – Houston, 16300 Park Row Blvd. Houston, TX 77084, USA
Diana K. Rasner
Affiliation:
Aramco Services Company, Aramco Research Center – Houston, 16300 Park Row Blvd. Houston, TX 77084, USA
Kenneth D. Johnson
Affiliation:
Aramco Services Company, Aramco Research Center – Houston, 16300 Park Row Blvd. Houston, TX 77084, USA
Carl J. Thaemlitz
Affiliation:
Aramco Services Company, Aramco Research Center – Houston, 16300 Park Row Blvd. Houston, TX 77084, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Peter J. Boul at [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Powerful synergies between phosphonate, zinc oxide, and acrylamido-tert-butyl-sulfonate (ATBS) copolymer chemical additives render superior performance in a high-temperature retarder system for oil well grade Portland cement. The phosphonate retarder and ATBS-based retarders establish a two-tiered strength development where amorphous C-S-H converts to crystalline dicalcium silicate hydrate (C2SH) in the first (low compressive strength) tier prior to the reaction of Portlandite with quartz. The three additive retarder system can be tuned with nanosilica to eliminate the two-tiered strength development effect leading to a smooth transition from the cement in the slurry form directly to its highest compressive strength.

Type
Research Letters
Information
MRS Communications , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 1022 - 1028
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Nelson, E.B. and Guillot, D.: Well Cementing, 2nd ed. (Schlumberger, Sugar Land, Texas, 2006).Google Scholar
2.Plank, J.: Failed cement job cause environmental catastrophe at BPs oil well. Cement Int. 2, 68 (2011).Google Scholar
3.Hunter, B., Tahmourpour, F., and Faul, R.: Cementing casing strings across salt zones: an overview of global best practices. SPE Drill. Compl. 25, 426 (2010).Google Scholar
4.Scherer, G.W., Kutchko, B., Thaulow, N., Duguid, A., and Mook, B.: Characterization of cement from a well at Teapot Dome Oil Field: implications for geological sequestration. Int. J. Greenh. Gas C 5, 115 (2011).Google Scholar
5.Kutchko, B.G., Strazisar, B.R., Dzombak, D.A., Lowry, G.V., and Thaulow, N.: Degradation of well cement by CO2 under geologic sequestration conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 4676 (2007).Google Scholar
6.Plank, J., Lummer, N.R., and Dugonjić-Bil, F.: Competitive adsorption between an AMPS®-based fluid loss polymer and Welan gum biopolymer in oil well cement. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 116, 2913 (2010).Google Scholar
7.Fink, J.K.: Oil Field Chemicals, (Gulf Professional Publishing, Burlington, MA, 2003).Google Scholar
8.Cheung, J., Jeknavorian, A., Roberts, L., and Silva, D.: Impact of admixtures on the hydration kinetics of Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 41, 1289 (2011).Google Scholar
9.Bullard, J.W., Jennnings, H.M., Livingston, R.A., Nonat, A., Scherer, G.W., Schweitzer, J.S., Scrivener, K.L., and Thomas, J.J.: Mechanisms of cement hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 41, 1208 (2011).Google Scholar
10.Gani, M.S.J.: Cement and Concrete (Chapman and Hall, London, 1997).Google Scholar
11.Krakowiak, K.J., Thomas, J.J., Musso, S., James, S., Akono, A.T., and Ulm, F.-J.: Nano-chemo-mechanical signature of conventional oil-well cement systems: effects of elevated temperature and curing time. Cem. Concr. Res. 67, 103 (2015).Google Scholar
12.Meller, N., Hall, C., Kyritsis, K., and Giriat, G.: Synthesis of cement based CaO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O (CASH) hydroceramics at 200 and 250 °C: Ex-situ and in-situ diffraction. Cem. Concr. Res. 37, 823 (2007).Google Scholar
13.John, E., Matschei, T., and Stephan, D.: Nucleation seeding with calcium silicate hydrate. Cem. Concr. Res. 113, 74 (2018).Google Scholar
14.Jeong, Y.J., Youm, K.S., and Yun, T.S.: Effect of nano-silica and curing conditions on the reaction rate of class G well cement exposed to geological CO2-sequestration conditions. Cem. Concr. Res. 109, 208 (2018).Google Scholar
15.Bu, Y., Hou, X., Wang, C., and Du, J.: Eect of colloidal nanosilica on early-age compressive strength of oil well cement stone at low temperature. Constr. Build. Mater. 171, 690 (2018).Google Scholar
16.Pang, X., Boul, P.J., and Cuello-Jimenez, W.: Nanosilicas as Accelerators in Oilwell Cementing at Low Temperatures. SPE Drill. Completion 29, 98 (2014).Google Scholar
17.Santra, A., Boul, P.J., and Pang, X.: in SPE International Oilfield Nanotechnology Conference held in Noordiwijk, Netherlands, 12–14 June, 2012. SPE-156937-MS. (2012).Google Scholar
18.Björnström, J., Martinelli, A., Matic, A., Börjesson, L., and Panas, I.: Accelerating effects of colloidal nano-silica for beneficial calcium-silicate-hydrate formation in cement. Chem. Phys. Lett. 392, 242 (2004).Google Scholar
19.Nili, M. and Ehsani, A.: Investigating the eect of the cement paste and transition zone on strength development of concrete containing nanosilica and silica fume. Mater. Des. 75, 174 (2015).Google Scholar
20.Choolaei, M., Rashidi, A.M., Ardjmand, M., Yadegari, A., and Soltanian, H.: The effect of nanosilica on the physical properties of oil well cement. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 538, 288 (2012).Google Scholar
21.García-Taengua, E., Sonebi, M., Hossain, K.M.A., Lachemi, M., and Khatib, J.: Effects of the addition of nanosilica on the rheology, hydration and development of the compressive strength of cement mortars. Composites Part B 81, 120 (2015).Google Scholar
22.Madani, H., Bagheri, A., and Parhizkar, T.: The pozzolanic reactivity of monodisperseed nanosilica hydrosols and their influence on the hydration characteristics of Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 42, 1563 (2012).Google Scholar
23.Berke, N.S. and Caldarone, M.A.: Zinc oxide: a powerful retarding admixture. Concr. Int. 35, 42 (2013).Google Scholar
24.Ataie, F.F., Juenger, M.C.G., Taylor-Lange, S.C., and Riding, K.A.: Comparison of the retarding mechanisms of zinc oxide and sucrose of cement hydration and interactions with supplementary cementitious materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 72, 128 (2015).Google Scholar
25.Taylor-Lange, S.C., Riding, K.A., and Juenger, M.C.G.: Increasing the reactivity of metakaolin-cement blends using zinc oxide. Cem. Concr. Compos. 34, 835 (2012).Google Scholar
26.Bishop, M., Bott, S.G., and Barron, A.R.: New mechanism for cement hydration inhibition: solid-state chemistry of calcium nitrilotris(methylene)triphosphonate. Chem. Mater. 15, 3074 (2003).Google Scholar
27.Pang, X., Boontheung, P., and Boul, P.J.: Dynamic retarder exchange as a trigger for Portland cement hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 63, 20 (2014).Google Scholar
28.Sangodkar, R.P., Smith, B.J., Gajan, D., Rossini, A.J., Roberts, L.R., Funkhouser, G.P., Lesage, A., Emsley, L., and Chmelka, B.F.: Influences of dilute organic adsorbates on the hydration of low-surface-area silicates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8096 (2015).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Boul et al. supplementary material

Boul et al. supplementary material 1

Download Boul et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.3 MB