Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T10:56:06.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finite element modeling and simulations on indentation and scratch tests on thin films: effects of prestress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2019

Biao Feng  and
Zhen Liu
Biao Feng
Affiliation:
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Zhen Liu*
Affiliation:
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Zhen Liu at [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Indentation and scratch models are proposed to numerically investigate effects of compressive prestress on film's mechanical responses. In indentation, normal stress distributions are strongly dependent on film thickness; the applied force and the maximum normal stresses with a prestress are much larger than without prestress. For various film thicknesses the change in the normal force in scratch between the non-prestressed and prestressed films is 4%–23%. The scratch friction coefficient is larger with prestress than without prestress. With biaxial or uniaxial prestress the material becomes more difficult to deform or to slide at the contact surface compared with cases without prestress.

Type
Research Letters
Information
MRS Communications , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 756 - 763
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Chalker, P.R., Bull, S.J., and Rickerby, D.S.: A review of the methods for the evaluation of coating-substrate adhesion. Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. 40, 583–592 (1991).Google Scholar
2.Hainsworth, S.V. and Soh, W.C.: The effect of the substrate on the mechanical properties of TiN coatings. Surf. Coat. Tech. 163, 515–520 (2003).10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00652-7Google Scholar
3.Hogmark, S., Jacobson, S., and Larsson, M.: Design and evaluation of tribological coatings. Wear 246, 20 (2000).Google Scholar
4.Je, J.H., Gyarmati, E., and Naoumidis, A.: Scratch adhesion test of reactively sputtered TiN coatings on a soft substrate. Thin Solid Films 136, 57 (1986).10.1016/0040-6090(86)90108-2Google Scholar
5.Bull, S.J., Rickerby, D.S., and Jain, A.: The sliding wear of titanium nitride coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 41, 269 (1990).10.1016/0257-8972(90)90138-3Google Scholar
6.Sinha, S.K. and Lim, D.B.J.: Effects of normal load on single-pass scratching of polymer surfaces. Wear 260, 751 (2006).Google Scholar
7.Hintermann, H.E.: Adhesion, friction and wear of thin hard coatings. Wear 100, 381 (1984).10.1016/0043-1648(84)90023-1Google Scholar
8.Bucaille, J.L., Felder, E., and Hochstetter, G.: Experimental and three-dimensional finite element study of scratch test of polymers at large deformations. J. Tribol.-Trans. ASME 126, 372 (2004).Google Scholar
9.Ivanov, V.V., Lebedev, V.A., and Pinahin, I.A.: Improving wear resistance of surface by depositing vibrational mechanochemical MoS2 coating. J. Frict. Wear 35, 339 (2014).Google Scholar
10.Feng, B. and Chen, Z.: Tribology behavior during indentation and scratch of thin films on substrates: effects of plastic friction. AIP Adv. 5, 057152 (2015).Google Scholar
11.Feng, B.: Tribology behavior on scratch tests: effects of yield strength. Friction 5, 108–114 (2017).Google Scholar
12.Feng, B.: Effects of surface roughness on scratch resistance and stress-strain fields during scratch tests. AIP Adv. 7, 035217 (2017).10.1063/1.4979332Google Scholar
13.Jiang, H., Zhang, J., Yang, Z., Jiang, C., and Kang, G.: Modeling of competition between shear yielding and crazing in amorphous polymers' scratch. Int. J. Solids. Struct. 124, 215–228 (2017).Google Scholar
14.Zhang, T., Cheng, W., Peng, G., Ma, Y., Jiang, W., Hu, J., and Chen, H.: Numerical investigation of spherical indentation on elastic-power-law strain-hardening solids with non-equibiaxial residual stresses. MRS Commun. 9, 360–369 (2019).Google Scholar
15.Peng, G., Lu, Z., Ma, Y., Feng, Y., Huan, Y., and Zhang, T.: Spherical indentation method for estimating equibiaxial residual stress and elastic–plastic properties of metals simultaneously. J. Mater. Res. 33, 884–897 (2018).Google Scholar
16.Jiang, H., Lim, G.T., Reddy, J.N., Whitcomb, J.D., and Sue, H.J.: Finite element method parametric study on scratch behavior of polymers. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Phys. 45, 1435–1447 (2007).Google Scholar
17.Jiang, H., Browning, R., Whitcomb, J.D., Ito, M., Shimouse, M., Chang, T.A., and Sue, H.J.: Mechanical modeling of scratch behavior of polymeric coatings on hard and soft substrates. Tribol. Lett. 37, 159–167 (2010).Google Scholar
18.Bucaille, J.L., Gauthier, C., Felder, E. and Schirrer, R.: The influence of strain hardening of polymers on the piling-up phenomenon in scratch tests: experiments and numerical modelling. Wear 260, 803–814 (2006).Google Scholar
19.Felder, E., Bucaille, J.L., and Hochstetter, G.: Influence of the rheology of polymers on their scratch resistance: experimental and numerical simulation studies. Ann. Chim.-Sci. Mat. 28, 15 (2003).Google Scholar
20.Holmberg, K., Laukkanen, A., Ronkainen, H., Wallin, K., and Varjus, S.: A model for stresses, crack generation and fracture toughness calculation in scratched TiN-coated steel surfaces. Wear 254, 278 (2003).10.1016/S0043-1648(02)00297-1Google Scholar
21.Li, J. and Beres, W.: Three-dimensional finite element modelling of the scratch test for a TiN coated titanium alloy substrate. Wear 260, 1232 (2006).Google Scholar
22.Bellemare, S.C., Dao, M., and Suresh, S.: Effects of mechanical properties and surface friction on elasto-plastic sliding contact. Mech. Mater. 40, 206 (2008).Google Scholar
23.Lu, J.: Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses, (The Fairmont Press, Lilburn, Georgia, 1996).Google Scholar
24.Lu, Z., Feng, Y., Peng, G., Yang, R., Huan, Y., and Zhang, T.: Estimation of surface equi-biaxial residual stress by using instrumented sharp indentation. Mat. Sci. Eng. A 614, 264–272 (2014).Google Scholar
25.Jiang, H., Wei, Y., Cheng, Q., and Zhu, Z.: Scratch behavior of low density polyethylene film: effects of pre-stretch and aging. Mater. Des. 157, 235–243 (2018).10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.052Google Scholar
26.Tan, Y., Jiang, S., Nie, S., Yang, D., Zhang, G., and Peng, R.: Prestress Scratching on SiC ceramic. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 9, 322–328 (2012).Google Scholar
27.Ott, R.D., Blue, C.A., Santella, M.L., and Blau, P.J.: The influence of a heat treatment on the tribological performance of a high wear resistant high SiAl-Si alloy weld overlay. Wear 251, 868–874 (2001).Google Scholar
28.Feng, B. and Levitas, V.I.: Coupled phase transformations and plastic flows under torsion at high pressure in rotational diamond anvil cell: effect of contact sliding. J. Appl. Phys. 114, 213514 (2013).Google Scholar
29.Feng, B., Levitas, V.I., and Hemley, R.J.: Large elastoplasticity under static megabar pressures: formulation and application to compression of samples in diamond anvil cells. Int. J. Plast. 84, 33–57 (2016).10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.04.017Google Scholar
30.Feng, B., Bronkhorst, C.A., Addessio, F.L., Morrow, B.M., Cerreta, E.K., Lookman, T., Lebensohn, R.A., and Low, T.: Coupled elasticity, plastic slip, and twinning in single crystal titanium loaded by split-Hopkinson pressure bar. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 119, 274–297 (2018).Google Scholar