Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:29:11.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthetic biology with nanomaterials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2018

Sanhita Ray
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata-700019, West Bengal, India
Ahana Mukherjee
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata-700019, West Bengal, India
Pritha Chatterjee
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
Kaushik Chakraborty
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, JD 2, Sector III, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700 098, West Bengal, India
Anjan Kr Dasgupta*
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata-700019, West Bengal, India
*
Address all correspondence to Anjan Kr Dasgupta at [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Magnetic field has been used to trigger biofilm formation. Iron oxide nanoparticles were attached to bacterial cells and cells were aggregated by application of magnetic field. Artificial cellular crowding triggered quorum sensing and led to the formation of biofilm at the sub-threshold population. Aggregation process was monitored by studying temporal dynamics of capacitance and conductance profiles. Capacitive profile exhibited a plateau upon introduction of magnetic field which was retained even after field was removed. This hysteresis property signified biofilm initiation in response to artificial crowding. This work demonstrates how synthetic biology is enabled by including nanoparticles in the interactome.

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Oldham, P., Hall, S., and Burton, G.: Synthetic biology: mapping the scientific landscape. PLoS ONE 7, e34368 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Jewett, M.C., Calhoun, K.A., Voloshin, A., Wuu, J.J., and Swartz, J.R.: An integrated cell-free metabolic platform for protein production and synthetic biology. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 220 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Brimacombe, C.A., Stevens, A., Jun, D., Mercer, R., Lang, A.S., and Beatty, J.T.: Quorum-sensing regulation of a capsular polysaccharide receptor for the Rhodobacter capsulatus gene transfer agent (rcgta). Mol. Microbiol. 87, 802817 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Parsek, M.R. and Greenberg, E.: Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 13, 2733 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Zhu, J. and Mekalanos, J.J.: Quorum sensing-dependent biofilms enhance colonization in vibrio cholera. Dev. Cell 5, 647656 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. O'Toole, G., Kaplan, H.B., and Kolter, R.: Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54, 4979 (2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Hagen, S.J., Son, M., Weiss, J.T., and Young, J.H.: Bacterium in a box: sensing of quorum and environment by the luxi/luxr gene regulatory circuit. J. Biol. Phys. 36, 317327 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Borcherding, J., Baltrusaitis, J., Chen, H., Stebounova, L., Wu, C.-M., Rubasinghege, G., Mudunkotuwa, I.A., Caraballo, J.C., Zabner, J., Grassian, V.H., and Comellas, A.P.: Iron oxide nanoparticles induce Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth, induce biofilm formation, and inhibit antimicrobial peptide function. Environ. Sci. Nano 1, 123132 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Haney, C., Rowe, J.J., and Robinson, J.B.: Spions increase biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa . J. Biomater. Nanobiotechnol. 3, 508 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Zolata, H., Davani, F.A., and Afarideh, H.: Synthesis, characterization and theranostic evaluation of indium-111 labelled multifunctional superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Nucl. Med. Biol. 42, 164170 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Maleki, H., Simchi, A., Imani, M., and Costa, B.: Size-controlled synthesis of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and their surface coating by gold for biomedical applications. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324, 39974005 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Sakulkhu, U., Mahmoudi, M., Maurizi, L., Coullerez, G., Hofmann-Amtenbrink, M., Vries, M., Motazacker, M., Rezaee, F., and Hofmann, H.: Significance of surface charge and shell material of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (spion) based core/shell nanoparticles on the composition of the protein corona. Biomater. Sci. 3, 265278 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Li, Y.-G., Gao, H.-S., Li, W.-L., Xing, J.-M., and Liu, H.-Z.: In situ magnetic separation and immobilization of dibenzothiophene-desulfurizing bacteria. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 50925096 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Borole, A.P., Aaron, D., Hamilton, C.Y., and Tsouris, C.: Understanding long-term changes in microbial fuel cell performance using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 27402745 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Kim, T., Kang, J., Lee, J.-H., and Yoon, J.: Influence of attached bacteria and biofilm on double layer capacitance during biofilm monitoring by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Water Res. 45, 46154622 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Mauricio, R., Dias, C., and Santana, F.: Monitoring biofilm thickness using a non-destructive, on-line, electrical capacitance technique. Environ. Monit. Assess. 119, 599607 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Liu, Y., Li, Y., Li, X.-M., and He, T.: Kinetics of (3-aminopropyl) triethoxylsilane (aptes) silanization of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir 29, 1527515282 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Leclerc, M., Colbeau, A., Cauvin, B., and Vignais, P.M.: Cloning and sequencing of the genes encoding the large and the small subunits of the h 2 uptake hydrogenase (hup) of Rhodobacter capsulatus . Mol. Gen. Genet. MGG 214, 97107 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Badamasi, Y.A.: The working principle of an Arduino, in: IEEE 2014 11th Int. Conf. on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO). , 2014, pp. 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Hirschorn, B., Orazem, M.E., Tribollet, B., Vivier, V., Frateur, I., and Musiani, M.: Determination of effective capacitance and film thickness from constant-phase-element parameters. Electrochim. Acta 55, 62186227 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Ray et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S6

Download Ray et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 3.1 MB