Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T21:54:29.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In situ electrochemical polymerization of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) for peripheral nerve interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2018

Jamie M. Murbach ,
Seth Currlin ,
Adrienne Widener ,
Yuxin Tong ,
Shrirang Chhatre ,
Vivek Subramanian ,
David C. Martin ,
Blake N. Johnson  and
Kevin J. Otto
Jamie M. Murbach
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Seth Currlin
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Adrienne Widener
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Yuxin Tong
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Shrirang Chhatre
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
Vivek Subramanian
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
David C. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
Blake N. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Kevin J. Otto*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Kevin J. Otto at [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The goal of this study was to perform in situ electrochemical polymerization of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) in peripheral nerves to create a soft, precisely located injectable conductive polymer electrode for bi-directional communication. Intraneural PEDOT polymerization was performed to target both outer and inner fascicles via custom fabricated 3D printed cuff electrodes and monomer injection strategies using a combination electrode-cannula system. Electrochemistry, histology, and laser light sheet microscopy revealed the presence of PEDOT at specified locations inside of peripheral nerve. This work demonstrates the potential for using in situ PEDOT electrodeposition as an injectable electrode for recording and stimulation of peripheral nerves.

Type
Research Letters
Information
MRS Communications , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 1043 - 1049
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Grill, W.M. and Mortimer, J.T.: Neural and connective tissue response to long-term implantation of multiple contact nerve cuff electrodes. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 50, 215 (2000).Google Scholar
2.Lago, N., Ceballos, D., Rodríguez, F.J., Stieglitz, T., and Navarro, X.: Long term assessment of axonal regeneration through polyimide regenerative electrodes to interface the peripheral nerve. Biomaterials 26, 2021 (2005).Google Scholar
3.Lago, N., Yoshida, K., Koch, K.P., and Navarro, X.: Assessment of biocompatibility of chronically implanted polyimide and platinum intrafascicular electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54, 281 (2007).Google Scholar
4.de la Oliva, N., Navarro, X., and del Valle, J.: Time course study of long-term biocompatibility and foreign body reaction to intraneural polyimide-based implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.—Part A 106, 746 (2017).Google Scholar
5.Abidian, M.R. and Martin, D.C.: Multifunctional Nanobiomaterials for Neural Interfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 573 (2009).Google Scholar
6.Asplund, M., Nyberg, T., and Inganäs, O.: Electroactive polymers for neural interfaces. Polym. Chem. 1, 1374 (2010).Google Scholar
7.Cui, X. and Martin, D.C.: Electrochemical deposition and characterization of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) on neural microelectrode arrays. Sensors Actuators B 89, 92 (2003).Google Scholar
8.Green, R. and Abidian, M.R.: Conducting polymers for neural prosthetic and neural interface applications. Adv. Mater. 27, 7620 (2015).Google Scholar
9.Wilks, S.J., Richardson-Burns, S.M., Hendricks, J.L., Martin, D.C., and Otto, K.J.: Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as a micro-neural interface material for electrostimulation. Front. Neuroeng. 2, 1 (2009).Google Scholar
10.Yang, J., Kim, D.H., Hendricks, J.L., Leach, M., Northey, R., and Martin, D.C.: Ordered surfactant-templated poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) conducting polymer on microfabricated neural probes. Acta Biomater. 1, 125 (2005).Google Scholar
11.Ludwig, K.A., Uram, J.D., Yang, J., Martin, D.C., and Kipke, D.R.: Chronic neural recordings using silicon microelectrode arrays electrochemically deposited with a poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) film. J. Neural Eng 3, 59 (2006).Google Scholar
12.Wilks, S.J., Woolley, A.J., Ouyang, L., Martin, D.C., and Otto, K.J.: In vivo Polymerization of Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) in Rodent Cerebral Cortex. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual IEEE EMBC International Conference, 2011.Google Scholar
13.Cui, X.T., and Zhou, D.D.: Poly (3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene) for chronic neural stimulation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 15, 502 (2007).Google Scholar
14.Kozai, T.D.Y., Catt, K., Du, Z., Na, K., Srivannavit, O., Haque, R.M., Seymour, J., Wise, K.D., Yoon, E., and Cui, X.T.: Chronic In vivo evaluation of PEDOT/CNT for stable neural recordings. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 63, 111 (2016).Google Scholar
15.Ludwig, K.A., Langhals, N.B., Joseph, M.D., Richardson-Burns, S.M., Hendricks, J.L., and Kipke, D.R.: Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) polymer coatings facilitate smaller neural recording electrodes. J. Neural Eng 8, 1 (2011).Google Scholar
16.Venkatraman, S., Hendricks, J., King, Z.A., Sereno, A.J., Richardson-Burns, S., Martin, D., and Carmena, J.M.: In vitro and In vivo evaluation of PEDOT microelectrodes for neural stimulation and recording. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 19, 307 (2011).Google Scholar
17.Alba, N.A., Du, Z.J., Catt, K.A., Kozai, T.D.Y., and Cui, X.T.: In vivo electrochemical analysis of a PEDOT/MWCNT neural electrode coating. Biosensors 5, 618 (2015).Google Scholar
18.Boehler, C., Kleber, C., Martini, N., Xie, Y., Dryg, I., Stieglitz, T., Hofmann, U.G., and Asplund, M.: Actively controlled release of Dexamethasone from neural microelectrodes in a chronic in vivo study. Biomaterials 129, 176 (2017).Google Scholar
19.Chikar, J.A., Hendricks, J.L., Richardson-Burns, S.M., Raphael, Y., Pfingst, B.E., and Martin, D.C.: The use of a dual PEDOT and RGD-functionalized alginate hydrogel coating to provide sustained drug delivery and improved cochlear implant function. Biomaterials 33, 1982 (2012).Google Scholar
20.Bhagwat, N., Kiick, K.L., and Martin, D.C.: Electrochemical deposition and characterization of carboxylic acid functionalized PEDOT copolymers. J. Mater Res 29, 2835 (2014).Google Scholar
21.Feldman, K.E., and Martin, D.C.: Functional conducting polymers via Thiol-ene Chemistry. Biosensors 2, 305 (2012).Google Scholar
22.Guimard, N.K., Gomez, N., and Schmidt, C.E.: Conducting polymers in biomedical engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 32, 876 (2007).Google Scholar
23.Ouyang, L., Shaw, C., Kuo, C., Griffin, A., and Martin, D.: In vivo polymerization of poly (3 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) in the living rat hippocampus does not cause a significant loss of performance in a delayed alternation task. J. Neural Eng. 11, 1 (2014).Google Scholar
24.Richardson-Burns, S.M., Hendricks, J.L., Foster, B., Povlich, L.K., Kim, D.H., and Martin, D.C.: Polymerization of the conducting polymer around living neural cells. Biomaterials 28, 1539 (2007a).Google Scholar
25.Richardson-Burns, S.M., Hendricks, J.L., and Martin, D.C.: Electrochemical polymerization of conducting polymers in living neural tissue. J. Neural Eng 4, L6 (2007b).Google Scholar
26.Egeland, B.M., Urbanchek, M.G., Peramo, A., Richardson-Burns, S.M., Martin, D.C., Kipke, D.R., Kuzon, W.M., and Cederna, P.S.: In vivo electrical conductivity across critical nerve gaps using Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-coated neural interfaces. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 126, 1865 (2010).Google Scholar
27.Urbanchek, M.G., Kung, T.A., Frost, C.M., Martin, D.C., Larkin, L.M., Wollstein, A., and Cederna, P.A.: Development of a regenerative peripheral nerve interface for control of a neuroprosthetic limb. Biomed Res. Int. 2016, 1 (2016).Google Scholar
28.Tong, Y., Murbach, J.M., Subramanian, V., Chhatre, S., Delgado, F., Martin, D.C., Otto, K.J., Romero-Ortega, M., and Johnson, B.N.: A hybrid 3D printing and robotic-assisted embedding approach for design and fabrication of nerve cuffs with integrated locking mechanisms. MRS Adv (2018) doi. 10.1557/adv.2018.378.Google Scholar
29.Chung, K., Wallace, J., Kim, S.Y., Kalyanasundaram, S., Andalman, A.S., Davidson, T.J., Mirzabekov, J.J., Zalocusky, K.A., Mattis, J., Denisin, A.K., Pak, S., Berstein, H., Ramakrishnan, C., Grosenick, L., Gradinaru, V., and Deisseroth, K.: Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems. Nature 497, 332 (2013).Google Scholar
30.Cogan, S.F.: Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10, 275 (2008).Google Scholar