Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:18:09.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Surface Treatment on the Mode I Debonding of Interface Between Silica and Nylon6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2016

Saeid Arabnejad ,
Sergei Manzhos  and
VPW Shim
Saeid Arabnejad
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117575, Singapore
Sergei Manzhos*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117575, Singapore
VPW Shim
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117575, Singapore
*
*(Email: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

In this study, mode I debonding of the interface between silica and nylon-6 is examined using molecular dynamics, to predict the mechanical behavior of the interface between the polymer and silica. The effect of two types of surface treatment to the silica– Aminopropyltriethoxysilane and Hexamethyldisilazane (APTES and HMDZ) – on debonding is studied. Comparing the results for debonding between untreated, APTES and HMDZ modified surfaces suggests that the APTES treated surface provides a higher strength and toughness for surface debonding. The strength and toughness of the treated interfaces are higher than that of those of bare silica. The simulation results also show the formation of nano-sized voids in the polymer prior to separation with silica.

Keywords

polymersurface reactionsimulation
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 39: Materials Design , 2016 , pp. 2717 - 2722
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Yuan, M.; Turng, L.-S. Polymer. 2005, 46 (18), 7273–7292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arabnejad, S.; Pouriayevali, H.; Lim, G. S.; Cheong W. C., D.; Shim, V. Int. J. Multiscale Comput. Eng. 2014, 12 (2), 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Q. H.; Yu, a. B.; Lu, G. Q. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2008, 33 (2), 191–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, G.; Goettler, L. Polymer. 2002, 43, 541–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fermeglia, M.; Ferrone, M.; Pricl, S. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2003, 212 (1-2), 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternack, R. M.; Rivillon Amy, S.; Chabal, Y. J. Langmuir 2008, 24 (22), 12963–12971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, H.; Guo, Y.; Wong, S. Y.; He, C.; Li, X.; Shim, V. P. W. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 75, 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motalla, H. A.; Steinmetz, J. R. Chemically Modified Surfaces; Elsevier, 1992.Google Scholar
Angst, D. L.; Simmons, G. W. Langmuir 1991, 7, 2236–2242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, D. K.; Yates, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 1699–1703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, M. F.; Jones, D. R. H. Engineering materials 1 : an introduction to their properties and applications, 2nd ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford ; Boston, 1996.Google Scholar
Fornes, T. D.; Paul, D. R. Polymer. 2003, 44 (14), 3945–3961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galeski, A.; Argon, A. S.; Cohen, R. E. Macromolecules 1991, 24, 3953–3961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauberosguthorpe, P.; Roberts, V. A.; Osguthorpe, D. J.; Wolff, J.; Genest, M.; Hagler, A. T. Proteins-Structure Funct. Genet. 1988, 4 (1), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar