Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:27:01.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gramsci's unorthodox Marxism: political ambiguity and sociological relevance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Darrow Schecter
Darrow Schecter*
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
*
∗ Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gramsci's work continues to enjoy popularity amongst academics and activists. There is nonetheless a real question about the relevance of his central political ideas for the twenty-first century. This paper defends the thesis that Gramsci's humanism is part of a long tradition of political thought which dates back to Machiavelli, and that although this national-popular humanism is now outdated for reasons which are suggested in the writings and films of Pier Paolo Pasolini, there is also a sociological component to Gramsci's theorising that retains resonance today.

Il pensiero di Gramsci continua ad essere molto popolare sia tra gli storici sia tra gli attivisti politici. Esiste un dibattito in merito alla rilevanza odierna delle sue principali teorie. Questo saggio sostiene che l'umanesimo politico di Gramsci è la continuazione di un pensiero politico che risale al Macchiavelli e che, nonostante questo tipo di umanesimo ‘nazional-popolare’ possa dirsi sorpassato, come suggerito da Pier Paolo Pasolini in taluni scritti e films, la componente sociologica delle teorie gramsciane è tuttora per più aspetti valida sia dal punto di vista analitico che da quello politico.

Keywords

GramsciMachiavelliPasolinihegemonyhistoric blocorganic intellectualswar of positionpassive revolution
Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 145 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellamy, R. 1987. Modern Italian social theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Berardinelli, A. 2003. Introduction to Pasolini, P.P. Lettere Luterane. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. 1976. Gramsci e la concezione della società civile. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Brandist, C. 1996. Gramsci, Bakhtin and the semiotics of hegemony. New Left Review 216: 94–109.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, C. 1975. L'institution imaginaire de la société. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Chabod, F. 1964. Scritti su Machiavelli. Einaudi: Turin.Google Scholar
Fontana, B. 1993. Hegemony and power: On the relation between Gramsci and Machiavelli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gentile, G. 1943. Genesi e struttura della società. Florence: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Gobetti, P. 2000. In On liberal revolution, ed. Urbinati, N., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. 1996. Pasolini: Forms of Subjectivity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. 1973. In Scritti politici III, ed. Spriano, P., Rome: Riuniti.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. 1975a. In Political Writings, 1921–26, ed. Hoare, Q., London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. 1975b. In Quaderni del carcere, ed. Gerratana, V., Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. 1982. In La città futura, ed. Caprioglio, S., Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. 1970. Die Philosophie des Rechts. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Ives, P. 2004. Gramsci's politics of language: Engaging Bakhtin and the Frankfurt School. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1970. In Kant's political writings, ed. Reiss, Hans, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1977. Schriften zur Anthropologie, Geschichtsphilosophie, Politik und Pädogogik I. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kebir, S. 1991. Gramscis Zivilgesellschaft: Alltag, Ökonomie, Kultur, Politik. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
Labriola, A. 1905. Sindacalismo e riformismo. Florence: Nerbini.Google Scholar
Labriola, A. 1910. Storia di dieci anni, 1899–1909. Milan: Il Viandante.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. 1995. Il Principe. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. 2000. Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Morton, D.M. 2007. Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and passive revolution in the global political economy. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Pasolini, P.P. 1976. Le ceneri di Gramsci. Milan: Garzanti.Google Scholar
Pasolini, P.P. 1990. Scritti corsari. Milan: Garzanti.Google Scholar
Pasolini, P.P. 1995. Trilogia della vita. Milan: Garzanti.Google Scholar
Pasolini, P.P. 2000. Empirismo eretico. Milan: Garzanti.Google Scholar
Pasolini, P.P. 2003. Lettere luterane. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Salvadori, M. 1994. Storia d'Italia e crisi di regime. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Schecter, D. 2005. Liberalism and the limits of legal legitimacy: Kant and Habermas. King's College Law Journal 16: 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schecter, D. 2007. Liberalism and the limits of knowledge and freedom: On the epistemological and social bases of negative liberty. History of European Ideas 33: 195–211.Google Scholar
Spriano, P. 1977. Gramsci e Gobetti. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Vighi, F. 2001. Le ragioni dell'altro: La formazione intellettuale di Pasolini tra saggista, letteratura e cinema. Ravenna: Longo Editore.Google Scholar