Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:23:18.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Smooth structures and Einstein metrics on

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

RAREŞ RǍSDEACONU  and
IOANA ŞUVAINA
RAREŞ RǍSDEACONU
Affiliation:
Einstein Institute of Mathematics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Edmond J. Safra Campus, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel. e-mail: [email protected]
IOANA ŞUVAINA
Affiliation:
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, NYU, 251 Mercer St., New York, NY 10012, U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show that each of the topological 4-manifolds , for k = 5, 6, 7, 8 admits a smooth structure which has an Einstein metric of scalar curvature s > 0, a smooth structure which carries an Einstein metric with s < 0 and infinitely many non-diffeomorphic smooth structures which do not admit Einstein metrics. We also exhibit new examples of higher dimensional manifolds carrying Einstein metrics of both positive and negative scalar curvature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 147 , Issue 2 , September 2009 , pp. 409 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Akhmedov, A., Baykur, R. and Park, B.Constructing infinitely many smooth structures on small 4-manifolds J. Topol. 1 no. 2 (2008), 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Aubin, T.Équations du type Monge–Ampère sur les variétés kähleriennes compactes. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sr. A-B 283 no. 3 (1976), A119–A121.Google Scholar
[3]Besse, A.Einstein manifolds. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. (3), 10 (Springer Verlag, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Catanese, F. and LeBrun, C.On the scalar curvature of Einstein manifolds. Math. Res. Lett. 4 no. 6 (1997), 843–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Kollár, J. and Mori, S.Birational geometry of algebraic varieties. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. 134 (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
[6]LeBrun, C.Four-manifolds without Einstein metrics. Math. Res. Lett. 3 no. 2 (1996), 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]LeBrun, C.Ricci curvature, minimal volumes and Seiberg–Witten theory. Invent. Math. 145 no. 2 (2001), 279–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Lee, Y. and Park, J.A simply connected surface of general type with pg = 0 and K 2 = 2. Invent. Math. 170 no. 3 (2007), 483–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Morgan, J. W.The Seiberg-Witten equations and applications to the topology of smooth four-manifolds. Mathematical Notes. 44 (Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
[10]Park, J.Simply connected symplectic 4-manifolds with b +2 = 1 and c 21 = 2. Invent. Math. 159 no. 3 (2005), 657–667Google Scholar
[11]Park, H., Park, J. and Shin, D. A simply connected surface of general type with pg = 0 and K 2 = 3. arXiv:0708.0273v3Google Scholar
[12]Park, H., Park, J. and Shin, D. A simply connected surface of general type with pg = 0 and K 2 = 4. arXiv:0803.3667v1 [math.AG]Google Scholar
[13]Siu, Y. T.The existence of Kähler–Einstein metrics on manifolds with positive anticanonical line bundle and a suitable finite symmetry group. Ann. of Math. (2) 127, no. 3 (1988), 585–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Tian, G. and Yau, S- T.Kähler–Einstein metrics on complex surfaces with c 1 > 0. Comm. Math. Phys. 112 no. 1 (1987), 175–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Tian, G.On Calabi's conjecture for complex surfaces with positive first chern class. Invent. Math. 101 no. 1 (1990), 101–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Yau, S. -T.Calabi's conjecture and some new results in algebraic geometry. Proc. Nat. Acad. U.S.A. 74 (1997), 1789–1799.Google Scholar
[17]Wall, C. T. C.On simply-connected 4-manifolds. J. London Math. Soc. 39 (1964), 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar