Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:50:56.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Real forms of cusp singularities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

C. T. C. Wall
C. T. C. Wall
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Cusp singularities were introduced and described in detail in Hirzebruch's fundamental paper [3] (se recall some of the basic results in § 1 below). They form a natural and well-behaved class, included in Laufer's ‘minimally elliptic’ singularities [5]. Those which occur on hypersurfaces appear also as hyperbolic singularities in Arnold's [1] classification of 1-modal singularities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 99 , Issue 2 , March 1986 , pp. 213 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Arnold, V. I.. Critical points of smooth functions and their normal forms. Russ. Math. Surveys 30 v (1975), 1–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Ebeling, W. and Wall, C. T. C.. Kodaira singularities and an extension of Arnold's strange duality. Compositio Math., 56 (1985), 3–77.Google Scholar
[3]Hirzebruch, F. E. P.. Hilbert modular surfaces. L' Enseignement Math. 19 (1973), 183–281.Google Scholar
[4]Inoue, M.. New surfaces with no meromorphic functions II. In Complex Analysis and Algebraic Geometry, ed. Baily, W. C. and Shioda, T. (Cambridge University Press and Iwanami Shoten, 1977), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Laufer, H.. On minimally elliptic singularities. Amer. J. Math. 99 (1977), 1257–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Meeks, W. H. and Scott, G. P.. Finite group actions on 3-manifolds, to appear.Google Scholar
[7]Nakamura, I.. Inoue-Hirzebruch surfaces and a duality of hyperbolic unimodular singularities. Math. Ann. 252 (1980), 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Neumann, W. D.. Geometry of quasihomogeneous surface singularities. In Singularities, ed. Orlik, P., Proc. Symp. in Pure Math., vol 40, part 2 (Amer. Math. Soc., 1983), 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Pinkham, H. C.. Automorphisms of cusps and Inoue-Hirzebruch surfaces. Compositio Math. 52 (1984), 299–313.Google Scholar
[10]Scott, G. P.. The geometries of 3-manifolds. Bull. London Math. Soc. 15 (1983), 401–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Wahl, J. M.. Derivations, automorphisms and deformations of quasi-homogeneous singularities. In Singularities, ed. Orlik, P., Proc. Symp. in Pure Math., vol. 40, part 2 (Amer. Math. Soc., 1983), 613–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Waldhausen, F.. On irreducible 3-manifolds which are sufficiently large. Ann. of Math. 87 (1968), 56–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Wall, C. T. C.. A second note on symmetry of singularities. Bull. London Math. Soc. 12 (1980), 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]WALL, C. T.. Topological invariance of the Milnor number mod 2. Topology 22 (1983), 345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar