Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:34:02.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A prime strongly positive amphicheiral knot which is not slice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Erica Flapan
Erica Flapan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We begin by giving several definitions. A knot K in S3 is said to be amphicheiral if there is an orientation-reversing diffeomorphism h of S3 which leaves K setwise invariant. Suppose, in addition, that K is given an orientation. Then K is said to be positive amphicheiral if h preserves the orientation of K. If, in addition, the diffeomorphism h is an involution then K is strongly positive amphicheiral. Finally, we say a knot is slice if it bounds a smooth disc in B4. In this note we shall give a smooth example of a prime strongly positive amphicheiral knot which is not slice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 100 , Issue 3 , November 1986 , pp. 533 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bleiler, S.. Realizing concordant polynomials with prime knots. Pacific J. Math. 100 (1982), 249–257.Google Scholar
[2]Hartley, R. and Kawauchi, A.. Polynomials of amphicheiral knots. Math. Ann. 243 (1979) 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Kirby, R. and Lickorish, W. B. R.. Prime knots and concordance. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 86 (1979), 437–441.Google Scholar
[4]Kinoshita, S. and Terasaka, H.. On unions of knots. Osaka Math. J. 9 (1959), 131–153.Google Scholar
[5]Levine, J.. Knot cobordism groups in codimension two. Comment. Math. Helv. 44 (1969), 229–244.Google Scholar
[6]Lickorish, W. B. R.. Prime knots and tangles. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 267 (1981), 321–332.Google Scholar
[7]Livingston, C.. Knots which are not concordant to their reverses. Quart. J. Math. Oxford 34 (1983), 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Long, D. D.. Strongly plus-amphicheiral knots are algebraically slice. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 95 (1984), 309–311.Google Scholar