Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:40:29.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On weak non-equivalence of wavelet–like systems in L1†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

SMBAT GOGYAN  and
P. WOJTASZCZYK
SMBAT GOGYAN
Affiliation:
Institut of Mathematics, Armenian National Academy of Sciences, Marshal Baghramian ave. 24b, 375019 Yerevan, Armenia. e-mail: [email protected]
P. WOJTASZCZYK
Affiliation:
Institut of Applied Mathematics, Warsaw University, ul. Banacha 2, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show that in the Haar wavelet basis is not equivalent to any permutation with any signs of the Strω wavelet basis. We also construct a Haar-type system in L1[0,1] which is not equivalent to any subsequence with signs of the classical Haar basis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 144 , Issue 2 , March 2008 , pp. 499 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bechler, P.. Inequivalence of wavelet systems in L 1(ℝd) and BV (ℝd). Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Math. 53 (2005), no. 1, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Cohen, A.. Numerical Analysis of wavelet methods (Elsevier 2003).Google Scholar
[3]Tzafriri, L.. Uniqueness of structure in Banach spaces. In Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces, vol. 2 (North-Holland, 2003) 1635–1669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Kamont, A.. General Haar systems and greedy approximation. Studia Math. 145 (2001), 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Konyagin, S. V., Temlyakov, V. N.. A remark on greedy approximation in Banach spaces. East J. Approx. 5 (1999), 365–379.Google Scholar
[6]Pełczyński, A. and Singer, I.. On non-equivalent bases and conditional bases in Banach spaces. Studia Math. 25 (1964/65), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Sjölin, P.. The Haar and Franklin systems are not equivalent bases in L 1. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Ser. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys. 25 (1977), no. 11, 1099–1100.Google Scholar
[8]Strömberg, J.-O.. A modified Franklin system and higher order spline systems on ℝn as unconditional bases for Hardy spaces, In Conference in Harmonic Analysis in Honor of A. Zygmund, vol. II (Wadsworth, Belmont, 1983), pp. 475–493.Google Scholar
[9]Temlyakov, V. N.. Nonlinear methods of approximation. Found. Comput. Math. 3 (2003), no. 1, 33–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Temlyakov, V. N.. Best N-term approximation and greedy algorithms. Advances Comp. Math. 8 (1998), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Wojtaszczyk, P.. A mathematical introduction to wavelets. London Math. Soc. Student Texts 37. (Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Wojtaszczyk, P.. Wavelets as unconditional bases in L p(ℝ). J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 5, no. 1, (1999), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Wojtaszczyk, P.. Greedy type bases in Banach spaces. In Constructive theory of functions. (DARBA, Sofia, 2003), 136–155.Google Scholar