Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T11:25:37.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the stability of crystal lattices

VI. The properties of matter under high pressure and the lattice theory of crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. Fürth
R. Fürth
Affiliation:
The University Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been shown by M. Born (1) that the equation of state and other thermo-dynamical properties of crystals, for example the melting temperature and its dependence on pressure, can be derived by a logical development of the lattice theory of crystals. I was able to show in a recent paper (6) that the results of a very large number of experiments of various kinds on the mechanical and thermal behaviour of solids are in satisfactory agreement with this theory. In the present paper I wish to show that new experiments of Bridgman (7) on the compression of solids under very high pressure can also be used for a comparison with the same theory, and that the results of this investigation are in favour of the theory. Some considerations on the range of stability of a lattice under a high uniform negative pressure are added, which support the idea that there is a close relation between the theory of stability of crystal lattices and the theory of melting.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 1941 , pp. 177 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Born, M.J. Chem. Phys. 7 (1939), 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Born, M.Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 36 (1940), 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Misra, R. D.Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 16 (1940), 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Born, M. and Fürth, R.Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 36 (1940), 454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Born, M. and Misra, R. D.Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 36 (1940), 466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Fürth, R.Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 37 (1941), 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Bridgman, P. W.Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. 74 (1940), 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Joffé, A. and Lewitzky, M. A.Z. Phys. 35 (1926), 442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Zwicky, F.Z. Phys. 24 (1923), 131.Google Scholar
(10)Fürth, R.Nature, Lond., 145 (1940), 741;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 177 (1941), 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar