Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:20:11.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On quantum SU(2) invariants and generalized bridge numbers of knots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Yoshiyuki Yokota
Yoshiyuki Yokota
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Kyushu university 33, Fukuoka, 812, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Consider a knot K in a closed, oriented 3-manifold M. A genus g Heegaard decomposition of M is said to be a genus g bridge decomposition of K if it also decomposes K into trivial arcs in each handlebody. The genus g bridge number of K, denoted by bg(K), is defined as the minimal number of trivial arcs in a handlebody among all the genus g bridge decompositions of K [2, 13].

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 117 , Issue 3 , May 1995 , pp. 545 - 557
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Birman, J. S.. Braids, links and mapping class groups. Ann. Math. Stud. 82 (Princeton Univ. Press, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Doll, H.. A generalized bridge number for links in 3-manifolds. Math. Ann. 294 (1992), 701–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Garoufalidis, S.. Applications of TQFT invariants in low dimensional topology (preprint).Google Scholar
[4]Jones, V. F. R.. Hecke algebra representations of braid groups and link polynomials. Ann. Math. 126 (1987), 335–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Kauffman, L. H.. State models and the Jones polynomials. Topology 26 (1987), 395–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kirby, R.. A calculus for framed links in S3. Invent. Math. 45 (1978), 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Kirby, R. and Melvin, P.. The 3-manifold invariants of Witten and Reshetikhin-Turaev for sl(2, C). Invent. Math. 105 (1991), 473–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Kohno, T.. Tunnel number of knots and Jones-Witten invariants (preprint).Google Scholar
[9]Lickorish, W. B. R.. A representation of orientable combinatorial 3-manifolds. Ann. Math. 76 (1962), 531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Lickorish, W. B. R.. Calculations with the Temperley-Lieb algebra. Comment. Math. Helv. 67 (1992), 571–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Lickorish, W. B. R.. Skeins and handlebodies. Pacific J. Math. 159 (1993), 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Lickorish, W. B. R.. The skein method for three-manifold invariants. J. Knot Theory 2 (1993), 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Morimoto, K. and Sakuma, M.. On unknotting tunnels for knots. Math. Ann. 289 (1991), 143–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Morton, H. R.. Invariants of links and 3-manifolds from skein theory and from quantum groups (preprint).Google Scholar
[15]Reshetikhin, N. and Turaev, V. G.. Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups. Invent. Math. 103 (1991), 547–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Witten, E.. Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial. Comm. Math. Phys. 121 (1989), 351–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar