Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:31:37.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Ising's model of ferromagnetism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. Peierls
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ising discussed the following model of a ferromagnetic body: Assume N elementary magnets of moment μ to be arranged in a regular lattice; each of them is supposed to have only two possible orientations, which we call positive and negative. Assume further that there is an interaction energy U for each pair of neighbouring magnets of opposite direction. Further, there is an external magnetic field of magnitude H such as to produce an additional energy of − μH (+ μH) for each magnet with positive (negative) direction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , October 1936 , pp. 477 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Ising, , Zeits. für Physik, 31 (1925), 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

† Heisenberg, W., Zeits. für Physik, 49 (1928), 619CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for an account of the theory of Heisenberg and the extensions by Bloch and others, see Bloch, F., Handbuch der Radiologie, vi, 2 (Leipzig, 1934), 375.Google Scholar

* Bragg, W. L. and Williams, E. J., Proc. Roy. Soc. A. 145 (1934), 699CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Borelius, , Ann. d. Physik, 20 (1934), 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fowler, R. H., Proc. Roy. Soc. A. 149 (1935), 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bethe, H. A., Proc. Roy. Soc. A. 150 (1935), 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

† Cf. the preceding paper. This will be referred to as A.

* This value could be considerably improved without difficulty. Taking into account that according to condition (2) two successive steps must never be opposite to each other, there is only a choice of three possibilities for all but the first step, and in this way we easily obtain ⅓ instead of ¼.