Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:16:17.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Knot surgery and primeness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Francisco González Acuña  and
Hamish Short
Francisco González Acuña
Affiliation:
Instituto de Matemáticas, Universidad National Autonoma de México
Hamish Short
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The aim of this paper is to prove some new results towards answering the question: When does Dehn surgery on a knot give a non-prime manifold? This question has been raised on several occasions (see for instance [5] or [4]; concerning the latter see below). Recall that a 3-manifold is prime if, in any connected sum decomposition

one of M1, M2 is S3. (For standard definitions of low-dimensional topology see [2] or [16].)

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 99 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 89 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Conway, J. H.. An enumeration of knots and links, and some of their algebraic properties. In Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra (Pergamon Press, 1970), 329–358.Google Scholar
[2]Crowell, R. H. and Fox, R. H.. An Introduction to Knot Theory (Springer-Verlag, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Fenn, R.. Techniques of Geometric Topology. L.M.S. Lecture notes series, no. 57 (Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
[4]Fintushel, R. and Stern, R. J.. Constructing lens spaces by surgery on knots. Math. Z. 175 (1980), 33–51; Correction, Math. Z. 178 (1981), 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Gordon, C. McA.. Dehn surgery and satellite knots. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 275 (1983) 687–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Gordon, C. McA. and Litherland, R.. Incompressible surfaces in 3-manifolds. Topology Appl. 18 (1984), 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Hatcher, A. and Thurston, W.. Incompressible surfaces in 2-bridge knot complements. Preprint.Google Scholar
[8]Kirby, R. C.. Problems in low dimensional manifold theory. Proc. Sympos. Pure Maths. 32 (A.M.S., 1978), 273–312.Google Scholar
[9]Kim, P. K. and Tollefson, J. L.. Splitting the PL involutions of non-prime 3-manifolds. Mich. Math. J. 27 (1980), 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Lyndon, R. C. and Schupp, P.. Combinatorial Group Theory (Springer-Verlag, 1977).Google Scholar
[11]Montesinos, J. M.. Surgety on Links and Double Branched Covers. Annals of Math. Studies no. 84 (Princeton University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
[12]Magnus, W., Karass, A. and Solitar, D.. Combinatorial Group Theory (Dover, 1976).Google Scholar
[13]Moser, L.. Elementary surgery along a torus knot. Pacific J. Math. 38 (1971), 737–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Murasugi, K.. On a certain subgroup of the group of an alternating link. Amer. J. Math. 85 (1963), 544–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Norwood, F. H.. Every two-generator knot is prime. Proc. A.M.S., 86 (1982), 143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Rolfsen, D.. Knots and, Links (Publish or Perish Inc., 1976).Google Scholar
[17]Rourke, C. P.. Presentations of the trivial group. In Topology of Low-Dimensional Manifolds, Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 722 (Springer-Verlag, 1979), 134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Simon, J.. Roots and centralizers of peripheral elements in knot groups. Math. Ann. 222 (1976), 205–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Short, H. B.. Topological Methods in Group Theory. Thesis, University of Warwick, 1983.Google Scholar
[20]Zieschang, H., Über die Nielsensche Kürzungsmethode in freien Produkten mit Amalgam. Invent. Math. 10 (1970), 4–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Viro, O.. Linkings, 2-sheeted branched coverings and braids. Math. USSR Sbornik 16 (1972), 223–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Birman, J. S., and Hilden, H.. The homeomorphism problem for S 3. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 79 (1973), 1006–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Neuzil, J. P.. Elementary surgery manifolds and the elementary ideals. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1978), 225–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar