Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:38:30.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The irrotational flow of a perfect fluid past two spheres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

I. N. Sneddon
Affiliation:
Department of Natural PhilosophyThe UniversityGlasgow
J. Fulton
Affiliation:
Department of MathematicsThe Royal Technical CollegeGlasgow

Extract

1. The boundary value problem of Laplace's equation for two spheres is a classical one, and has been the subject of discussion by many mathematicians (1). The earliest attempt to solve a boundary value problem of this type is due to Poisson (2), but his analysis is applicable only to the electrostatic problem. The first of the methods which can be successfully applied to both electrostatic arid hydrodynamical problems was developed later by Lord Kelvin (3); this procedure, which is known as the ‘method of images’, was first applied to the problem of the motion of two spheres in a perfect fluid by Hicks (4). Another method of great generality, that of transforming Laplace's equation to bipolar coordinates and studying the solutions in these coordinates, was developed about the same time by Neumann (5) and much later by Jeffery (6). More recently a new method has been developed by Mitra (7) for the solution of the problem of two spheres in a potential field. It makes use of two sets of spherical polar coordinate systems; the solution is expressed in terms of infinite series whose coefficients satisfy an infinite set of linear algebraic equations. The chief interest of Mitra's method lies in the fact that he has found it possible to derive exact solutions of this infinite set of equations. All of these methods suffer from the disadvantage that the potential function is obtained in the form of an infinite series so that any numerical calculations are rendered cumbersome.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Gans, R.Encyclopädie der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 5 (1906), 15, 319.Google Scholar
(2)Poisson, L.Mem. Inst. 12 (1811), 1, 163.Google Scholar
(3)Thomson, W.Reprints of papers on electrostatics and magnetism (1872), p. 86.Google Scholar
(4)Hicks, W. M.Philos. Trans. 171 (1880), 455.Google Scholar
(5)Neumann, C.Hydrodynamische Untersuchungen (Leipzig, 1883), p. 283.Google Scholar
(6)Jeffery, G. B.Proc. Boy. Soc. A, 87 (1912), 109.Google Scholar
(7)Mitra, S. K.Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc. 36 (1944), 31.Google Scholar
(8)Weiss, P.Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 40 (1944), 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Endô, D.Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan, 20 (1938), 667.Google Scholar
(10)Lamb, H.Hydrodynamics (6th ed., Cambridge, 1932), § 138 (4).Google Scholar