Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:43:20.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A generalization of the Whitney rank generating function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

G. E. Farr
Affiliation:
CMR Group, Communications Division, ERL, Defence Science and Technology Organization, P.O. Box 4924, Kingston, A.C.T. 2604, Australia

Abstract

The Whitney quasi-rank generating function, which generalizes the Whitney rank generating function (or Tutte polynomial) of a graph, is introduced. It is found to include as special cases the weight enumerator of a (not necessarily linear) code, the percolation probability of an arbitrary clutter and a natural generalization of the chromatic polynomial. The crucial construction, essentially equivalent to one of Kung, is a means of associating, to any function, a rank-like function with suitable properties. Some of these properties, including connections with the Hadamard transform, are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Biggs, N. L.. Algebraic Graph Theory (Cambridge University Press, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Brylawski, T. H. and Oxley, J. G.. The Tutte polynomial and its applications. In Matroid Theory, vol. 3 (Cambridge University Press, to appear).Google Scholar
[3]Crapo, H. H. and Rota, G.-C.. On the Foundations of Combinatorial Theory: Combinatorial Geometries (M.I.T. Press, 1970).Google Scholar
[4]Farr, G. E.. A correlation inequality involving stable set and chromatic polynomials. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, to appear.Google Scholar
[5]Greene, C.. Weight enumeration and the geometry of linear codes. Stud. Appl. Math. 55 (1976), 119128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Jaeger, F., Vertigan, D. L. and Welsh, D. J. A.. On the computational complexity of the Jones and Tutte polynomials. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 108 (1990), 3653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Kung, J. P. S.. The Rédei function of a relation. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 29 (1980), 287296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Kung, J. P. S., Murty, M. R. and Rota, G.-C.. On the Rédei zeta function. J. Number Theory 12 (1980), 421436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]MacWilliams, F. J. and Sloane, N. J. A.. The Theory of Error-Correcting Codes (North-Holland, 1977).Google Scholar
[10]MacWilliams, F. J., Sloane, N. J. A. and Goethals, J.-M.. The MacWilliams identities for nonlinear codes. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 51 (1972), 803819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Oxley, J. G. and Welsh, D. J. A.. On some percolation results of J. M. Hammersley. J. Appl. Probab. 16 (1979), 526540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Oxley, J. G. and Welsh, D. J. A.. The Tutte polynomial and percolation. In Graph Theory and Related Topics (Academic Press, 1979), pp. 329339.Google Scholar
[13]Oxley, J. G. and Whittle, G. P.. A characterization of Tutte invariants of 2-polymatroids. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, to appear.Google Scholar
[14]Tutte, W. T.. A ring in graph theory. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 43 (1947), 2640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Tutte, W. T.. A contribution to the theory of chromatic polynomials. Canad. J. Math. 6 (1954), 8091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Tutte, W. T.. On dichromatic polynomials. J. Combin. Theory 2 (1967), 301320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Welsh, D. J. A.. Matroid Theory. London Math. Soc. Monograph no. 8 (Academic Press, 1976).Google Scholar
[18]Whittle, G. P.. The critical problem for 2-polymatroids. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2), to appear.Google Scholar
[19]Whittle, G. P.. Characteristic polynomials of weighted lattices. Adv. Math., to appear.Google Scholar