Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:34:52.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Filtrations, closure operations and prime divisors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

J. S. Okon
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, California State University, San Bernardino, California 92407, U.S.A.
L. J. Ratliff Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, U.S.A.

Abstract

Let ƒ = {In}n ≽ 0 be a filtration on a ring R, let

(In)w = {x ε R; x satisfies an equation xk + i1xk − 1 + … + ik = 0, where ij ε Inj} be the weak integral closure of In and let ƒw = {(In)w}n ≽ 0. Then it is shown that ƒ ↦ ƒw is a closure operation on the set of all filtrations ƒ of R, and if R is Noetherian, then ƒw is a semi-prime operation that satisfies the cancellation law: if ƒh ≤ (gh)w and Rad (ƒ) ⊆ Rad (h), then ƒwgw. These results are then used to show that if R and ƒ are Noetherian, then the sets Ass (R/(In)w) are equal for all large n. Then these results are abstracted, and it is shown that if IIx is a closure (resp.. semi-prime, prime) operation on the set of ideals I of R, then ƒ ↦ ƒx = {(In)x}n ≤ 0 is a closure (resp., semi-prime, prime) operation on the set of filtrations ƒ of R. In particular, if Δ is a multiplicatively closed set of finitely generated non-zero ideals of R and (In)Δ = ∪KεΔ(In, K: K), then ƒ ↦ ƒΔ is a semi-prime operation that satisfies a cancellation law, and if R and ƒ are Noetherian, then the sets Ass (R/(In)Δ) are quite well behaved.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bishop, W.. A theory of multiplicity for multiplicative filtrations. Ph.D. thesis, Western Michigan University 1971.Google Scholar
[2]Bishop, W., Petro, J. W., Ratliff, L. J. Jr. and Rush, D. E.. Note on Noetherian filtrations. Comm. Algebra, to appear.Google Scholar
[3]Katz, D. and Ratliff, L. J. Jr. On the symbolic Rees ring of a primary ideal. Comm. Algebra 14 (1986), 959970.Google Scholar
[4]Katz, D. and Ratliff, L. J. Jr. On the prime divisors of IJ when I is integrally closed. Preprint.Google Scholar
[5]McAdam, S. and Ratliff, L. J. Jr. On the asymptotic cograde of an ideal. J. Algebra 87 (1984), 3652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Mirbagheri, A. and Ratliff, L. J. Jr. On the relevant transform and the relevant component of an ideal. J. Algebra 111 (1987), 507519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Okon, J. S.. Prime divisors, analytic spread and filtrations. Pacific J. Math. 113 (1984), 451462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Petro, J. W.. Some results on the asymptotic completion of an ideal. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (1964), 519524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Ratlife, L. J. Jr. A characterization of analytically unramified semi-local rings and applications. Pacific J. Math. 27 (1968), 127143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Ratliff, L. J. Jr. Notes on essentially powers filtrations. Michigan Math. J. 26 (1979), 337353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Ratliff, L. J. Jr. On asymptotic prime divisors. Pacific J. Math. 111 (1984), 395413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Ratliff, L. J. Jr. Asymptotic prime divisors and integral extension rings. J. Algebra 95 (1985), 409431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Ratliff, L. J. Jr. Δ-closures of ideals and rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (to appear).Google Scholar
[14]Rees, D.. Asymptotic properties of ideals. Preprint.Google Scholar
[15]Whittington, K.. Asymptotic prime divisors and the altitude formula (preprint).Google Scholar
[16]Zariski, O. and Samuel, P.. Commutative Algebra, Vol. 1 (Van Nostrand. 1958).Google Scholar