Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:42:33.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diffraction by a wide slit and complementary strip. I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. F. Millar
Affiliation:
Radio and Electrical Engineering DivisionNational Research CouncilOttawa

Abstract

In recent years much attention has been directed towards the asymptotic solution of diffraction problems. In the present work, consideration is given to the relatively simple problem of the diffraction of an E-polarized plane wave by an infinite slit. The solution takes the form of a series in inverse powers of the ratio of slit-width to wavelength of the incident wave, and is based on the solution by successive substitutions of a pair of integral equations. The current densities induced on both halves of the screen are calculated, from which is deduced the electric field in the slit. The far-field is determined from the aperture distribution, and an asymptotic expression is found for the transmission coefficient as a function of the angle of incidence and the ratio of slit-width to wavelength.

While most previous work has been confined to near-normal incidence, the present theory is uniformly valid for all angles of incidence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Baker, B. B. and Copson, E. T.The mathematical theory of Huygens' principle. (Oxford, 1950.)Google Scholar
(2)Bouwkamp, C. J.Diffraction theory, a critique of some recent developments. New York University Mathematics Research Group, Research Report no. EM–50 (1953).Google Scholar
(3)Bouwkamp, C. J.Diffraction theory. Rep. Progr. Phys. 17 (1954), 35100.Google Scholar
(4)Burger, A. P.On the asymptotic solution of wave propagation and oscillation problems. National Aeronautical Research Institute, Amsterdam, Report F. 157 (1954).Google Scholar
(5)Clemmow, P. C.Trans. Inst. Radio Engrs, AP–4 (1956), 282–7.Google Scholar
(6)Fox, E. N.Phil. Trans. A, 241 (1948), Appendix A, 71103.Google Scholar
(7)Groschwitz, E. and Hönl, H.Z. Phys. 131 (1952), 305–19.Google Scholar
(8)Hönl, H. and Zimmeb, E.Z. Phys. 135 (1953), 196218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Jeffreys, H. and Jeffreys, B. S.Methods of mathematical physics (Cambridge, 1956), 501.Google Scholar
(10)Karp, S. N. and Russek, A.Diffraction by a wide slit. New York University, Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Research Report no. EM–75 (1955).Google Scholar
(11)Karp, S. N. and Russek, A.J. Appl. Phys. 27 (1956), 886–94.Google Scholar
(12)Keller, J. B.Diffraction by an Aperture. I. New York University, Institute of Mathe-matical Sciences, Research Report no. EM–92 (1956).Google Scholar
(13)Levine, H.Diffraction by an infinite slit. Applied Mathematics and Statistics Labora-tory, Stanford University, Stanford, California. Technical Report no. 61 (1957).Google Scholar
(14)Millar, R. F.Dissertation (Cambridge, 1957).Google Scholar
(15)Morse, P. M. and Rubenstein, P. J.Phys. Rev. 54 (1938), 895–8.Google Scholar
(16)Müller, R. and Westpfahl, K.Z. Phys. 134 (1953), 245–63.Google Scholar
(17)Rayleigh, Lord. Phil. Mag. 43 (1897), 259–72.Google Scholar
(18)Rayleigh, Lord. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 89 (1913), 194219.Google Scholar
(19)Schwarzschild, K.Math. Ann. 55 (1902), 177247.Google Scholar
(20)Sieger, B.Ann. Phys. 27 (1908), 626–64.Google Scholar
(21)Sommerfeld, A.Vorlesungen über theoretische Physik, Vol. IV, 1st ed. (Wiesbaden, 1950).Google Scholar
(22)Strutt, M. J. O.Z. Phys. 69 (1931), 597617.Google Scholar
(23)Timman, R.Trans. Inst. Radio Engrs, AP–4 (1956), 209–15.Google Scholar
(24)Watson, G. N.A treatise on the theory of Bessel functions. (Cambridge, 1944), 236.Google Scholar