Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:28:37.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deuteron bombardment of gold

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. S. Krishnan
R. S. Krishnan
Affiliation:
Cavendish LaboratoryCambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The paper describes the results obtained from a study of the bombardment of gold with deuterons of energy up to 9·1 M.e.V. The reactions found to take place in gold are the formation of 2·7 day Au198 by a (d-p) process and of 32 hr. Hg198* in a metastable state by a (d-n) process. The β-ray and γ-ray energies associated with each radioactivity have been measured by absorption methods. Excitation functions for the two reactions have been determined and the results have been compared with those to be expected on theoretical grounds.

The author takes this opportunity of expressing his gratitude to the past and present members of the Cavendish Cyclotron Laboratory for assistance in running the cyclotron. He wishes to thank the Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851 for the award of a Science Scholarship.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 1941 , pp. 186 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Cork, and Thornton, . Phys. Rev. 51 (1937), 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Bethe, . Rev. Mod. Phys. 9 (1938), 186–202.Google Scholar
(3)Feather, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 34 (1938), 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Amaldi, and others. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 149 (1935), 522.Google Scholar
Pool, , Cork, and Thornton, . Phys. Rev. 52 (1937), 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, Kamen, and Ruben, . Phys. Rev. 52 (1937), 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Richardson, . Phys. Rev. 55 (1939), 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Cork, and Halpern, . Phys. Rev. 58 (1940), 201.Google Scholar
(7)Heyn, . Nature, Lond., 139 (1937), 842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, , Kamen, and Ruben, . Phys. Rev. 52 (1937), 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool, , Cork, and Thornton, . Phys. Rev. 52 (1937), 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Krishnan, and Nahum, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 36 (1940), 490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Alvarez, . Phys. Rev. 54 (1938), 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Feather, and Bretsoher, . Nature, Lond., 143 (1939), 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Gamow, . Z. Phys. 51 (1928), 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamow, and Houtermans, . Z. Phys. 52 (1929), 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, and Condon, . Nature, Lond., 122 (1928), 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, and Condon, . Phys. Rev. 33 (1929), 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Oppenheimer, and Phillips, . Phys. Rev. 48 (1935), 500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Hurst, , Latham, and Lewis, . Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 174 (1940), 126.Google Scholar
(14)Mano, . J. Phys. Radium, 5 (1934), 626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Feenberg, . Phys. Rev. 55 (1939), 504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Bethe, . Phys. Rev. 53 (1938), 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Volkoff, . Phys. Rev. 57 (1940), 866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar