Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:28:39.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Note on hyperelliptic surfaces and certain kummer surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

H. F. Baker
Affiliation:
St John's College

Extract

In 1907 Enriques and Severi published an extensive and fascinating account of hyperelliptic surfaces. In general a hyperelliptic surface is that expressed by the necessary relation connecting three meromorphic functions of two variables which have four columns of periods. Such functions arise naturally by associating the two variables, in accordance with Jacobi's inversion problem for hyperelliptic integrals of genus 2, with a pair of points of a hyperelliptic curve. When the primitive periods of the functions are those arising for the curve, and the set of three functions chosen is representative, in the sense that only one pair of (incongruent) values of the variables arises for given values of the functions, the surface is called by Enriques and Severi a Jacobian surface; but, if several sets of (incongruent) values of the variables arise for given values of the functions, say r sets, the surface is said to be of rank r. For example, when the three functions are all even, to each set of values of these there belong not only the values u, v of the variables, but also the values −u, − v, and r is thus even, being 2 at least, as in the case of the Kummer surface. In the paper referred to, many cases in which r > 1, corresponding to particular hyperelliptic curves possessing involutions of order r, are worked out. In general the method followed consists in arguing, from the character of the associated group of order r, to the character and equation of the hyperelliptic surface Φ of rank r; and from this the Jacobian surface F is inferred upon which there exists an involution of sets of r points, the surface Φ being the representation of this involution. The argumentation is always beautiful, but often not very brief. The hyperelliptic surfaces for which the primitive periods of the functions are not those of a hyperelliptic curve are also shown in the paper to arise from involutions on the Jacobian surface; with these I am not here concerned.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Acta Mathematica, 32 (1907), 283392Google Scholar; 33 (1907), 321–403.

* These results are proved in detail in my volume, Multiply-periodic functions (Cambridge, 1907), Chapters II and III.

Enriques, and Severi, , Acta Math. 32 (1907), 347.Google Scholar

* Acta Math. 33 (1907), 366–76Google Scholar, Section xi, § 92.

* Burnside, , Theory of groups (1911), 359.Google Scholar

* Enriques, and Campedelli, , Teoria delle superficie algebriche (1932), 306.Google Scholar

Acta Math. 33 (1907), § 98, p. 376.Google Scholar

Kummer's quartic surface (1905), p. 94.Google Scholar

* Cf. Enriques, and Severi, , Acta Math. 32 (1907), 386–7.Google Scholar

* Acta Math. 33 (1907), 321–47.Google Scholar

* Kummer's quartic surface (1905), p. 92Google Scholar; cf. also p. 3.