Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:23:05.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Graph directed Markov systems on Hilbert spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

R. D. MAULDIN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle 311430, Denton TX 76203-5017, U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected]
T. SZAREK
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, University of Silesia, Bankowa 14, 40-007 Katowice, Poland and Institute of Mathematics Polish Academy of Sciences, Śniadeckich 8, 00-950 Warszawa, Poland. e-mail: [email protected]
M. URBAŃSKI
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle 311430, Denton TX 76203-5017, U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We deal with contracting finite and countably infinite iterated function systems acting on Polish spaces, and we introduce conformal Graph Directed Markov Systems on Polish spaces. Sufficient conditions are provided for the closure of limit sets to be compact, connected, or locally connected. Conformal measures, topological pressure, and Bowen's formula (determining the Hausdorff dimension of limit sets in dynamical terms) are introduced and established. We show that, unlike the Euclidean case, the Hausdorff measure of the limit set of a finite iterated function system may vanish. Investigating this issue in greater detail, we introduce the concept of geometrically perfect measures and provide sufficient conditions for geometric perfectness. Geometrical perfectness guarantees the Hausdorff measure of the limit set to be positive. As a by–product of the mainstream of our investigations we prove a 4r–covering theorem for all metric spaces. It enables us to establish appropriate co–Frostman type theorems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bandt, C. and Graf, S.Self-similar sets 7. A characterization of self-similar fractals with positive Hausdorff measure. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 114 (4) (1992), 9951001.Google Scholar
[2]Barnsley, M. F.Fractals Everywhere, Second Edition (Academic Press, 1993).Google Scholar
[3]Blair, D.Inversion Theory and Conformal Mapping, Student Mathematical Library, 9. (American Mathematical Society, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Falconer, K.Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications (Wiley, 1990).Google Scholar
[5]Hutchinson, J. E.Fractals and self-similarity. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30 (1981), 713747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kotus, J. and Urbański, M.Hausdorff dimension and Hausdorff measures of Julia sets of elliptic functions. Bull. London Math. Soc. 35 (2003), 269275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Kuratowski, K. Topology. Warszawa. Polish Scientific Publ. (1966).Google Scholar
[8]Mattila, P.Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidean Spaces, Fractals and Rectifiability (Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Mauldin, R. D. and Urbański, M.Dimensions and measures in infinite iterated function systems. Proc. London Math. Soc. 73 (3) (1996), no. 1, 105154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Mauldin, R. D. and Urbański, M.Conformal iterated function systems with applications to the geometry of continued fractions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 351 (1999), 49955025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Mauldin, R. D. and Urbański, M.Gibbs states on the symbolic space over an infinite alphabet. Israel J. Math. 125 (2001), 93130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Mauldin, R. D. and Urbański, M.Graph Directed Markov Systems: Geometry and Dynamics of Limit Sets. (Cambridge, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Peres, Y., Rams, M., Simon, K. and Solomyak, B.Equivalence of positive Hausdorff measure and the open set condition for self-conformal sets. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), 26892699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Przytycki, F. and Urbański, M.Fractals in the Plane – the Ergodic Theory Methods, available on the web:http://www.math.unt.edu/urbanski. (to appear Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
[15]Roy, M. and Urbański, M.Regularity properties of Hausdorff dimension in infinite conformal IFSs. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 25 (2005), no. 6, 19611983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Roy, M., Sumi, H. and Urbański, M. Lambda-topology vs. pointwise topology. to appear in Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems and available at http://www.math.unt.edu/~urbanski/papers.htmlGoogle Scholar
[17]Schief, A.Separation properties for self-similar sets. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 122 (1994), 111115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Stratmann, B. and Urbański, M.Diophantine extremality of the Patterson measure. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 140 (2006), 297304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Stratmann, B. and Urbański, M.Pseudo-Markov systems and infinitely generated Schottky groups. Amer. J. Math. 129 (2007), 10191062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Szarek, T. and Wedrychowicz, S.The OSC does not imply the SOSC for infinite iterated function systems. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 133 (2005), 437440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Urbański, M.Porosity in conformal infinite iterated function systems. J. Number Theory 88 No. 2 (2001), 283312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Urbański, M.Diophantine approximation of self-conformal measures. J. Number Theory 110 (2005), 219235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Urbański, M.Diophantine approximation for conformal measures of one-dimensional iterated function systems. Compositio Math. 141 (2005), 869886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Urbański, M.Finer Diophantine and regularity properties of 1-dimensional parabolic, IFS. Real Anal. Exchange 31 (2006), 143165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Urbański, M. and Zdunik, A.Real analyticity of Hausdorff dimension of finer Julia sets of exponential family. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 24 (2004), 279315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar