Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:17:54.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The excitation functions of some (np) reactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

E. Bretscher  and
D. H. Wilkinson
E. Bretscher
Affiliation:
Cavendish LaboratoryCambridge
D. H. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Cavendish LaboratoryCambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Investigations of reactions of the type

are of interest for their own sake, and also for the fact that, if is a radioactive nucleus, as it usually is, being a stable isobar, activation of a few different A nuclei in the same fast neutron flux will yield some information about the neutron spectrum. This follows from the fact that these (np) reactions (and the similar (nα) reactions) are nearly all endothermic, showing a threshold of neutron energy below which no activation takes place. Thus knowledge of the excitation functions of a few such reactions would enable the above-mentioned crude neutron spectroscopy to be realized. The detectors (A nuclei) would have a standard shape and size, and the induced β-activity would be measured with a standard counter in fixed geometrical conditions. Though exact spectroscopy would not be possible, any change in the relative activations of the detectors would be a quite sensitive indicator of a change in the incident neutron spectrum.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , January 1949 , pp. 141 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Feld, B. T., Scalettar, R. and Szilard, L.Phys. Rev. 71 (1947), 464 (A).Google Scholar
(2)Barschall, H. H. and Battat, M. E.Phys. Rev. 70 (1946), 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Allen, K. W., Burcham, W. E. and Wilkinson, D. H.Nature, London, 159 (1947), 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Livesey, D. L. and Wilkinson, D. H.Proc. Roy. Soc. A. (In the press.)Google Scholar
(5)Bretscher, E. and French, A. P. (Unpublished.)Google Scholar
(6)Allen, K. W., Burcham, W. E. and Wilkinson, D. H.Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 192 (1947), 114.Google Scholar
(7)Crittenden, E. C.Phys. Rev. 56 (1939), 709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Moore, B. L.Phys. Rev. 57 (1940), 355 (A).Google Scholar
(9)Richardson, J. R.Phys. Rev. 53 (1938), 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Kurie, F. N. D., Richardson, J. R. and Paxton, H. C.Phys. Rev. 49 (1936), 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Newson, H. W.Phys. Rev. 51 (1937), 624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Livingood, J. J. and Seaborg, G. T.Phys. Rev. 53 (1938), 765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Sagane, R., Kojima, S. and Miyamoto, G.Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan, 21 (1939), 728.Google Scholar
(14)Ridenour, L. N., Delsasso, L. A., White, M. G. and Sherr, R.Phys. Rev. 53 (1938), 770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Townsend, A. A.Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 177 (1941), 357.Google Scholar
(16)Tyler, A. W.Phys. Rev. 56 (1939), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Swartout, J. A., Boyd, G. E., Cameron, A. E., Keim, C. P., and Larson, C. E.Phys. Rev. 70 (1946), 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar