Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:44:18.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The energy exchanges between molecules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

P. S. H. Henry
P. S. H. Henry
Affiliation:
Trinity College, 1851 Senior Student. (The Colloid Science Laboratory, Cambridge.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The marked disagreement between the specific heats at high temperatures of the diatomic gases as found by sound velocity measurements, and those calculated from theoretical considerations, has for long been a source of perplexity to statistical mechanists; a perplexity all the greater in view of the simple nature of the theoretical calculations which appeared to form as direct a test of Boltzmann's hypothesis and the theory of band spectra as was possible to large scale measurements. One way out of the difficulty is to attribute the differences to the experimental difficulties inherent in the sound velocity method of measurement at high temperatures(1), but it cannot be denied that there is a certain measure of agreement between the separate velocity determinations. It consequently becomes necessary to examine the theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 1932 , pp. 249 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Proc. Phys. Soc., 43, p. 340 (1931). See also (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Ann. d. Phys., 11, pp. 761, 777 (1931).Google Scholar
(3)Phil. Mag., 3, p. 273 (1927); 6, p. 920 (1928); 9, p. 1020 (1930).Google Scholar
(4)Zeit. f. Phys. Chem. B, 5, p. 413 (1929).Google Scholar
(5)Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 133, p. 492 (1931).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Zeit. f. Phys. Chem. B, 7, p. 226 (1930).Google Scholar
(7)Nature, 126, p. 436 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Am. Acad. Sci., 60, p. 271 (1925).Google Scholar
(9)Phys. Rev., 31, p. 691 (1928).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Phil. Mag., 7, p. 821 (1929).Google Scholar
(11)Neklepajew, , Ann. d. Phys., 35, p. 175 (1911); Rich and Pielemeier, Phys. Rev., 25, p. 117 (1925); and Abello, Phys. Rev., 31, p. 1083 (1928).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Phys. Rev., 38, p. 277 (1931). See also Phys. Rev., 37, p. 556 (1931), and O. K. Rice, Phys. Rev., 38, p. 1943 (1931).Google Scholar