Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T08:31:38.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compactifications and A-compactifications of frames. Proximal frames

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Georgi D. Dimov  and
Gino Tironi
Georgi D. Dimov
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University ofSofia, Blvd. J. Bourchier 5.1126 Sofia, Bulgaria
Gino Tironi
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Trieste, P.le Europa 1, 34100 Trieste, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The aim of this paper is to give two new descriptions of the ordered set of all (up to equivalence) regular compactifications of a completely regular frame. F and to introduce and study the notion of A-frame as a generalization of the notion of Alexandroff space (known also as zero-set space) (Alexandroff[l], Gordon[15]). A description of the ordered set of all (up to equivalence) A-compactifications of an A-frame by means of an ordered by inclusion set of some distributive lattices (called AP-sublattices) is obtained. It implies that any A-frame has a greatest A-compactification and leads to the descriptions of A new category isomorphic to the category of proximal frames is introduced. A question for compactifications of frames analogous to the R. Chandler's question [8, p. 71] for compactifications of spaces is formulated and solved. Many results of [1], [3], [15], [23], [9], [10] and [11] are generalized.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 119 , Issue 2 , February 1996 , pp. 321 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Alexandroff, A. D.. Additive set-functions in abstract spaces. Mat. Sb. 50. 51, 55 (1940, 1941, 1943), 307–348, 563–628, 169–238.Google Scholar
[2]Adámek, J., Herrlich, H. and Strecker, G.. Abstract and concrete categories (Wiley, 1990).Google Scholar
[3]Blasco, J. L.. Hausdorff compactifications and Lebesgue sets. Topology Appl. 15 (1983), 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Banaschewski, B.. Frames and compactifications. Contributions to Extension Theory of Topological Structures (Flachsmeyer, J., Poppe, H., Terpe, F., eds.), (VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1969), pp. 29–33.Google Scholar
[5]Banaschewski, B. and Gilmouh, C. R. A.. Stone-Čech compactification and dimension theory for regular σ-frames. J. London Math. Soc. 39 (1989), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Banaschewski, B. and Mulvey, C. J.. Stone-Čech compactification of locales I. Houston J. Math. 6 (1980), 301–312.Google Scholar
[7]Banaschewski, B. and Pultr, A.. Samuel compactification and completion of uniform frames. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 108 (1990), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Chandler, R. E.. Hausdorff compactifications (Marcel Dekker, 1976).Google Scholar
[9]Dimov, G. and Tironi, G.. A new approach to proximities and compactifications. C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci. 45 (7) (1992), 5–8.Google Scholar
[10]Dimov, G. and Tironi, G.. A new approach to proximities and compactifications - II. C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci. 45 (8) (1992), 13–15.Google Scholar
[11]Dimov, G. and Tironi, G.. Compactifications, A-compactifications and proximities. Annali di Mat. Pura Appl., to appear.Google Scholar
[12]Engelking, R.. General topology (PWN, Warszawa, 1977).Google Scholar
[13]Fletcher, P. and Hunsaker, W.. Proximities for frames, preprint.Google Scholar
[14]Frith, J. L.. Structured frames (Thesis, Univ. of Cape Town, 1987).Google Scholar
[15]Gordon, H.. Rings of continuous functions determined by zero sets. Pacific J. Math. 36 (1971), 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Gilmour, C. R. A.. Realcompact spaces and regular σ-frames. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 96 (1984), 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Hager, A. W.. Cozero fields. Conferenze Seminario Matem. Univ. Bari 175 (1980).Google Scholar
[18]Johnstone, P.. Stone spaces (Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
[19]MacLane, S.. Categories for the working mathematician (Springer-Verlag, 1971).Google Scholar
[20]Madden, J. and Vermeer, J.. Lindelöf locales and realcompactness. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 99 (1986), 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Reynolds, G.. On the spectrum of a real representable ring. Proc. Symp. of Appl. of Sheaves, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 753 (Springer-Verlag, 1979), 595–611.Google Scholar
[22]Reynolds, G.. Alexandroff algebras and complete regularity. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 76 (1979), 322–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Wajch, E.. Compactifications and L-separations. Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 29 (1988), 477–484.Google Scholar
[24]Walters, J.. Compactifications and uniformities of sigma frames. Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 32 (1991), 189–198.Google Scholar