Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:52:21.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A calculus for rational tangles: applications to DNA recombination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

C. Ernst  and
D. W. Sumners
C. Ernst
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Ky. 42101, U.S.A.
D. W. Sumners
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Fla. 32306, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There exist naturally occurring enzymes (topoisomerases and recombinases), which, in order to mediate the vital life processes of replication, transcription, and recombination, manipulate cellular DNA in topologically interesting and non-trivial ways [24, 30]. These enzyme actions include promoting the coiling up (supercoiling) of DNA molecules, passing one strand of DNA through another via a transient enzyme-bridged break in one of the strands (a move performed by topoisomerase), and breaking a pair of strands and recombining them to different ends (a move performed by recombinase). An interesting development for topology has been the emergence of a new experimental protocol, the topological approach to enzymology [30], which directly exploits knot theory in an effort to understand enzyme action. In this protocol, one reacts artificial circular DNA substrate with purified enzyme in vitro (in the laboratory); the enzyme acts on the circular DNA, causing changes in both the euclidean geometry (supercoiling) of the molecules and in the topology (knotting and linking) of the molecules. These enzyme-caused changes are experimental observables, using gel electrophoresis to fractionate the reaction products, and rec A enhanced electron microscopy [15] to visualize directly and to determine unambiguously the DNA knots and links which result as products of an enzyme reaction. This experimental technique calls for the building of knot-theoretic models for enzyme action, in which one wishes mathematically to extract information about enzyme mechanism from the observed changes in the DNA molecules.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 108 , Issue 3 , November 1990 , pp. 489 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bankwitz, C. and Schumann, H. G.. Über Viergeflechte. Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 10 (1934), 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bleiler, S.. Knots prime on many strings. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 282 (1984), 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bleiler, S.. Prime tangles and composite knots. In Knot theory and manifolds. Proceedings, 1983, Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 1144 (Springer-Verlag, 1985), pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Bleiler, S.. Strongly invertible knots have property R. Math. Z. 189 (1985), 365–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Bleiler, S. and Scharlemann, M.. Tangles, property P and a problem of J. Martin. Math. Ann. 273 (1986), 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Bonahon, F. and Siebenmann, L. C.. New Geometric Splittings of Classical Knots. London Math. Soc. Monographs. (To appear.)Google Scholar
[7]Burde, G. and Zieschang, H.. Knots (de Gruyter, 1985).Google Scholar
[8]Conway, J.. On enumeration of knots and links and some of their related properties. In Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra; Proc. Conf. Oxford 1967 (Pergamon Press, 1970), pp. 329–358.Google Scholar
[9]Culler, M. C., Gordon, C. M., Luecke, J. and Shalen, P. B.. Dehn surgery on knots. Ann. of Math. (2) 125 (1987), 237–300.Google Scholar
[10]Dean, F. B., Stasiak, A., Koller, T. and Cozzarelli, N. R.. Duplex DNA knots produced by Escherichia Coli topoisomerase I. J. Biol. Chem. 260 (1985), 4795–4983.Google Scholar
[11]Ernst, C. and Sumners, D. W.. The growth of the number of prime knots. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 102 (1987), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Gabai, D.. Foliations and surgery on knots. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (1986), 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Gordon, C. M. and Luecke, J.. Knots are determined by their complements. (Preprint, University of Texas, 1988.)Google Scholar
[14]Heil, W.. Elementary surgery of Seifert fiber spaces. Yokohama Math. J. 22 (1974), 135–139.Google Scholar
[15]Krasnow, M. A., Stasiak, A., Spengler, S. J., Dean, F., Koller, T. and Cozzarelli, N. R.. Determination of the absolute handedness of knots and catenanes of DNA. Nature 304 (1983), 559–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[16]Lickorish, W. B. R.. Prime knots and tangles. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 267 (1981), 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Lickorish, W. B. R.. The unknotting number of a classical knot. Contemp. Math. 44 (1985), 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Moser, L.. Elementary surgery along a torus knot. Pacific J. Math. 38 (1971), 737–745.Google Scholar
[19]Montesinos, J. M.. Revetements ramifies de nouds, Espaces fibres de Seifert et scindements de Heegard. Publicaciones del Seminario Mathematico Garcia de Galdeano, Serie ii, Seccion 3 (1984).Google Scholar
[20]Rolfsen, D.. Knots and Links (Publish or Perish, 1976).Google Scholar
[21]Schubert, H.. Knoten mit zwei Brucken. Math. Z. 65 (1956), 133–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Seifert, H.. Topologie dreidimensionaler gefaserter Raume. Ada Math. 60 (1933), 147–238.Google Scholar
[23]Spengler, S. J., Stasiak, A. and Cozzarelli, N. R.. The stereostructure of knots and catenanes produced by phase A integrative recombination: implications for mechanism and DNA structure. Cell 42 (1985), 325–334.Google Scholar
[24]Sumners, D. W.. The role of knot theory in DNA research. In Geometry and Topology (Marcel Dekker, 1987), pp. 297–318.Google Scholar
[25]Sumners, D. W.. Knots, macromolecules and chemical dynamics. In Graph Theory and Topology in Chemistry (Elsevier, 1987), pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
[26]Sumners, D. W.. Untangling DNA. The Math. Intelligencer 12 (1990), 71–80.Google Scholar
[27]Sumners, D. W., Ernst, C., Cozzarelli, N. R. and Spengler, S. J.. A topological model for site-specific recombination. (In preparation.)Google Scholar
[28]Walba, D. M.. Topological Stereochemistry. Tetrahedron 41 (1985), 3161–3212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29]Wang, J. W.. DNA topoisomerases. Scientific American 247 (1982), 94–109.Google Scholar
[30]Wasserman, S. A. and Cozzakelli, N. R.. Biochemical topology: applications to DNA recombination and replication. Science 232 (1986), 951–960.Google Scholar
[31]Wasserman, S. A. and Cozzarelli, N. R.. Determination of the stereostructure of the product of Tn3 resolvase by a general method. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.SA. 82 (1985), 1079–1083.Google Scholar
[32]Wasserman, S. A., Dungan, J. M. and Cozzarelli, N. R.. Discovery of a predicted DNA knot substantiates a model for site-specific recombination. Science 229 (1985), 171–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33]White, J. H.. An introduction to the geometry and topology of DNA structure. In Mathematical Methods for DNA Sequences (CRC Press, 1989), pp. 225–253.Google Scholar
[34]White, J. H., Millett, K. C. and Cozzabelli, N. R.. Description of the topological en- tanglement of DNA catenane and knots by a powerful method involving strand passage and recombination. J. Mol. Biol. 197 (1987), 585–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar