Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T17:16:53.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GLOBALLY INDETERMINATE GROWTH PATHS IN THE LUCAS MODEL OF ENDOGENOUS GROWTH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2019

Giovanni Bella*
Affiliation:
University of Cagliari
Paolo Mattana
Affiliation:
University of Cagliari
Beatrice Venturi
Affiliation:
University of Cagliari
*
Address correspondence to: Giovanni Bella, Department of Economics and Business, University of Cagliari, Via S. Ignazio 17, 09123 Cagliari (Italy). e-mail: [email protected]. Phone: +390706753340. Fax: +39070660929.

Abstract

This paper shows that global indeterminacy may characterize the three-dimensional vector field implied by the Lucas [(1988) Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3–42] endogenous growth model. To achieve this result, we demonstrate the emergence of a family of homoclinic orbits connecting the steady state to itself in backward and forward time, when the stable and unstable manifolds are locally governed by real eigenvalues. In this situation, we prove that if the saddle quantity is negative, and other genericity conditions are fulfilled, a stable limit cycle bifurcates from the homoclinic orbit. Orbits originating in a tubular neighborhood of the homoclinic orbit are then bound to converge to this limit cycle, creating the conditions for the onset of global indeterminacy. Some economic intuitions related to this phenomenon are finally explored.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aguirre, P., Krauskopf, B. and Osinga, H. M. (2013) Global invariant manifolds near homoclinic orbits to a real saddle: (Non)orientability and flip bifurcation. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems 12, 18031846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altăr, M., Necula, C. and Bobeica, G. (2008) Modeling the economic growth in Romania. The role of human capital. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting 9, 115128.Google Scholar
Antoci, A., Galeotti, M. and Russu, P. (2014) Global analysis and indeterminacy in a two-sector growth model with human capital. International Journal of Economic Theory 10, 313338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, W. A., Serletis, A. and Serletis, D. (2015) Nonlinear and complex dynamics in economics. Macroeconomic Dynamics 19, 17491779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bella, G., Mattana, P. and Venturi, B. (2017) Shilnikov chaos in the Lucas model of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Theory 172, 451477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bella, G. and Mattana, P. (2014) Global indeterminacy of the equilibrium in the Chamley model of endogenous growth in the vicinity of a Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation. Mathematical Social Sciences 71, 6979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J. and Farmer, R. E. A. (1996) Indeterminacy and sector-specific externalities. Journal of Monetary Economics 17, 421443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J. and Perli, R. (1994) Uniqueness and indeterminacy: On the dynamics of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Theory 63, 113142.10.1006/jeth.1994.1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J., Perli, R. and Xie, D. (1994) Monopolistic competition, indeterminacy and growth. Ricerche Economiche 48, 279298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J., Meng, Q. and Nishimura, K. (2000) Indeterminacy under constant returns to scale in multisector economies. Econometrica 68, 15411548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito, P. and Venditti, A. (2010) Local and global indeterminacy in two-sector models of endogenous growth. Journal of Mathematical Economics 46, 893911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamley, C. (1993) Externalities and dynamics in models of learning or doing. International Economic Review 34, 583609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Ray, E. and Lopez-Garcia, M.-A. (2017) On the dynamic efficiency of balanced growth paths in an endogenous growth setting. Macroeconomic Dynamics 21, 18371856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnier, J.-P., Nishimura, K. and Venditti, A. (2013) Local indeterminacy in continuous-time models: The role of returns to scale. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17, 326355.10.1017/S1365100511000137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, A., Semmler, W. and Gong, G. (2005) The Forces of Economic Growth: A Time Series Perspective. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99, 483499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetzov, Y. A. (2004) Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuyama, K. (1991) Increasing returns, industrialization, and indeterminacy of equilibrium. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 617650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattana, P., Nishimura, K. and Shigoka, T. (2009) Homoclinic bifurcation and global indeterminacy of equilibrium in a two-sector endogenous growth model. International Journal of Economic Theory 5, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minea, A. and Villieu, P. (2013) Debt policy rule, productive government spending, and multiple growth paths: A note. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17, 947954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mino, K. (2004) Human capital formation and patterns of growth with multiple equilibria. In: Boldrin, M., Chen, B.-L. and Wang, P. (eds.), Human Capital, Trade, and Public Policy in Rapidly Growing Economies: From Theory to Empirics, pp. 4264. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Nishimura, K. and Shigoka, T. (2006) Sunspots and Hopf bifurcations in continuous time endogenous growth models. International Journal of Economic Theory 2, 199216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shang, D. and Maoan, H. (2005) The existence of homoclinic orbits to saddle-focus. Applied Mathematics and Computation 163, 621631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, D. (1994) Divergence in economic performance: Transitional dynamics with multiple equilibria. Journal of Economic Theory 63, 97112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar