Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:33:17.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE THEORY OF FERTILITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2019

Luca Gori*
Affiliation:
University of Pisa
Mauro Sodini
Affiliation:
University of Pisa
*
Address correspondence to: Luca Gori, Department of Law, University of Pisa, Via Collegio Ricci, 10, I–56126 Pisa (PI), Italy. Phone: +39 050 22 12 847. e-mails: [email protected] or [email protected].

Abstract

The aim of this research is to build on a theory for explaining economic development in a (neoclassical) growth model with endogenous fertility. The economy is inhabited by overlapping generations of rational and identical individuals and identical competitive firms producing with a constant-returns-to-scale technology and no externalities. From a theoretical perspective, the distinguishing feature of this work is that endogenous fertility per se explains the existence of low- and high-development regimes. It provides different reasons (history driven or expectations driven) why some countries enter development trajectories with high GDP and low fertility and others experience underperformances with low GDP and high fertility. The model is also capable to reproduce fertility fluctuations and explain the baby busts and baby booms observed in the last century in some developed countries.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashraf, Q.H., Weil, D.N. and Wilde, J. (2013) The effect of fertility reduction on economic growth. Population and Development Review 39, 97130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azariadis, C. and Drazen, A. (1990) Threshold externalities in economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics 105, 501526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S. (1960) An economic analysis of fertility. In: Roberts, G.B., Ed., Demographic and economic change in developing countries, National Bureau Committee for Economic Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 209240.Google Scholar
Blackburn, K. and Cipriani, G.P. (2002) A model of longevity, fertility and growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 26, 187204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cervellati, M. and Sunde, U. (2005) Human capital, life expectancy, and the process of development. American Economic Review 95, 16531672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cervellati, M. and Sunde, U. (2013) Life expectancy, schooling, and lifetime labor supply: Theory and evidence revisited. Econometrica 81, 20552086.Google Scholar
Cervellati, M. and Sunde, U. (2015) The economic and demographic transition, mortality, and comparative development. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7, 189225.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, S. (2004) Endogenous lifetime and economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory 116, 119137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Córdoba, J.C. and Ripoll, M. (2016) Intergenerational transfers and the fertility–income relationship. Economic Journal 126, 949977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doepke, M. (2005) Child mortality and fertility decline: Does the Barro-Becker model fit the facts? Journal of Population Economics 18, 337366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doepke, M., Hazan, M. and Maoz, Y.D. (2015) The baby boom and World War II: A macroeconomic analysis. Review of Economic Studies 82, 10311073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, I. and Lui, F. (1997) The problem of population and growth: A review of the literature from Malthus to contemporary models of endogenous population and endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21, 205242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanti, L. and Gori, L. (2014) Endogenous fertility, endogenous lifetime and economic growth: The role of child policies. Journal of Population Economics 27, 529564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiaschi, D. and Fioroni, T. (2019) Transition to modern growth in Great Britain: the role of technological progress, adult mortality and factor accumulation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, R.W. (2004) The Escape from Hunger and Premature Death. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galor, O. (2011) Unified Growth Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Galor, O. (2012) The demographic transition: Causes and consequences. Cliometrica 6, 128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galor, O. and Moav, O. (2002) Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 11331191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galor, O. and Moav, O. (2004) From physical to human capital accumulation: Inequality and the process of development. Review of Economic Studies 71, 10011026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galor, O. and Weil, D.N. (1996) The gender gap, fertility, and growth. American Economic Review 86, 374387.Google Scholar
Galor, O. and Weil, D.N. (2000) Population, technology, and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to the Demographic Transition and beyond. American Economic Review 90, 806828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollin, D. (2002) Getting income shares right. Journal of Political Economy 110, 458474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandmont, J.M., Pintus, P. and de Vilder, R. (1998) Capital-labor substitution and competitive nonlinear endogenous business cycles. Journal of Economic Theory 80, 1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guryan, J., Hurst, E. and Kearney, M. (2008) Parental education and parental time with children. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22, 2346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R.E. (1988) Intertemporal substitution in consumption. Journal of Political Economy 96, 339357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R.E. and Jones, C.I. (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 83116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havranek, T., Horvath, R., Irsova, Z. and Rusnak, M. (2015) Cross-country heterogeneity in intertemporal substitution. Journal of International Economics 96, 100118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C.I. (2004) The Shape of Production Functions and the Direction of Technical Change. NBER Working Paper No. 10457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L.E. and Schoonbroodt, A. (2010) Complements versus substitutes and trends in fertility choice in dynastic models. International Economic Review 51, 671699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L.E. and Schoonbroodt, A. (2016) Baby busts and baby booms: The fertility response to shocks in dynastic models. Review of Economic Dynamics 22, 157178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L.E. and Tertilt, M. (2006) An Economic History of Fertility in the U.S.: 1826-1960. NBER Working Paper No. 12796.Google Scholar
Jones, L.E., Schoonbroodt, A. and Tertilt, M. (2008) Fertility Theories: Can They Explain the Negative Fertility-Income Relationship? NBER Working Paper No. 14266.Google Scholar
Krueger, A.B. (1999) Measuring labor’s share. American Economic Review 89, 4551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. (1991) History versus expectations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 651667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macunovich, D.J. (1998) Fertility and the hypothesis: An assessment of the literature. Journal of Population Economics 11, 53111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mankiw, N.G., Romer, D. and Weil, D.N. (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 407437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuyama, K. (1991) Increasing returns, industrialization, and indeterminacy of equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 617650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palivos, T. (1995) Endogenous fertility, multiple growth paths, and economic convergence. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 19, 14891510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palivos, T., Wang, P. and Zhang, J. (1997) On the existence of balanced growth equilibrium. International Economic Review 38, 205224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, P., Yip, C.K. and Scotese, C.A. (1994) Fertility choice and economic growth: Theory and evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 76, 255266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar