Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T16:23:57.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Institutions, The Development of Dispute Settlemen by Peter Stein. London: Butterworths, 1984, ix + 221 + (index) 13pp (hardback £12.50; paperback £8.50).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Peter Birks
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , July 1985 , pp. 238 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. (1703) 3 Ld. Raym. 909.

2. (1867) L.R. 2C.P. 651.

3. (1773) 2 W.BI. 892.

4. (1760) 2 Burr. 1005.

5. [1932] A.C. 562, 580.

6. D.9.2.31: for the case of one who dropped a branch from a tree or something from a scaffolding, the text reports Mucius as holding that liability depended on the presence of culpa: and: culpam autem esse quod cum a diligente provideri poterit, non esset provisum … Mucius, it will be recalled, was very early, some three hundred years before Ulpian. He was consul in 95 BC.

7. ‘The Histoy of the University of Oxford’, Vol 1, (ed J. Catto, Oxford 1984), 1–36 (R. W. Southern).

8. Tettenborn, A.M. Introduction: o the Law of Obligations (London, 1984)Google Scholar.

9. D.44.7.1 pr.; G.3.82; cf J Inst, 3.13.

10. (1982) 2LS I.

11. Cf‘The advance made in public opinion in the course of the last twenty-five years as to the importance of a sound legal education … has caused it to be acknowledged that, without becoming a professed Civilian, no-one can presume to call himself an accomplished lawyer unless he shall have some acquaintance with Roman Jurisprudence’ from Leapingwell's, G. preface to A Manual of the Roman Civil Law arranged after the analysis of Dr. Hallifax (Cambridge, 1859)Google Scholar.