1. Talbot, L Great Debates in Company Law (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014) p vii.Google Scholar

2. See eg Moore, M ‘A temple built on faulty foundations: piercing the corporate veil and the legacy of Salomon v Salomon ’ [2006] J Bus L 180.Google Scholar

3. See Davies, Pl and Worthington, S Gower and Davies' Principles of Modern Company Law (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 9th edn, 2012) ch 16.Google Scholar

4. See Kershaw, D Company Law in Context: Text and Materials (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 2012) ch 3Google Scholar; Wedderburn, Kw ‘Shareholders' rights and the rule in Foss v Harbottle ’ (1957) 15 Camb L J 194 andCrossRefGoogle Scholar (1958) 16 Camb L J 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. See eg Berle, Aa ‘Corporate powers as powers in trust’ (1931) 44(7) Harv L Rev 1049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dodd, Em ‘For whom are corporate managers trustees?’ (1932) 45(7) Harv L Rev 1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. At least in terms of conceptualising the shareholder's status within the company. Its practical significance is arguably less, since it is so rarely enforced.

7. See Davies and Worthington, above 3.

8. [1902] 2 ch 421.

9. Such as, for example, that offered by Honoré; see Honoré, T Making Law Bind: Essays Legal & Philosophical (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).Google Scholar

10. Talbot, above 1, p 44.

11. Ibid, p 51.

12. Financial Reporting Council (FRC) ‘The Uk stewardship code’ (2012); available at https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/Corporate-Governance/UK-Stewardship-Code-September-2012.pdf (accessed 27 March 2015).

13. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills ‘The Kay review of Uk equity markets and long-term decision making – final report’ (2012); available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/253454/bis-12-917-kay-review-of-equity-markets-final-report.pdf (accessed 27 March 2015).

14. UN Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights ‘Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporation and other business enterprises with regard to human rights’ (2003) E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2; available at https://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/links/norms-Aug2003.html (accessed 27 March 2015).

15. United Nations ‘Global compact ’; available at https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_events/8.1/GC_brochure_FINAL.pdf (accessed 27 March 2015).

16. J Ruggie ‘Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises: the United Nations Protect, Respect and Remedy: a framework for business and human rights’ (2008); available at http://www.reports-and-materials.org/sites/default/files/reports-and-materials/Ruggie-report-7-Apr-2008.pdf (accessed 27 March 2015).

17. J Ruggie ‘Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises: guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework’ (2011); available at http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/A-HRC-17-31_AEV.pdf (accessed 27 March 2015).

18. Ibid, Principle 11 commentary.

19. Deakin, S ‘The corporation as commons: rethinking property rights, governance and sustainability in the business enterprise’ (2011–2012) 37 Queens L J 339.Google Scholar

20. See Talbot, above 1, pp 163, 181.

21. See Hansmann, H The Ownership of Enterprise (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000) ch 6.Google Scholar

22. Ibid, p 90.

23. Talbot, above 1, p x.