No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Speculation Versus Fact: Reply to the Cohens
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 1977
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The comment by the Cohens on my article, “An Instance of Effective Legal Regulation” (1976), consists mainly of speculation about the fatality distributions and questions regarding the adequacy of the statistical models that I used to test for deviation from random fluctuation. Such speculation is unwarranted, and particularly so when the issue is public policy affecting human life. A point by point examination of the Cohens' comments indicates that they are without merit.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1977 The Law and Society Association
References
ANDREASSEND, D.C. (1972) “The Effects of Compulsory Seat Belt Wearing Legislation in Victoria,” in Papers Presented at the National Road Safety Symposium. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
CAIRNS, H. and H., HOLBURN (1943) “Head Injuries in Motorcyclists with Special Reference to Crash Helmets,” British Medical Journal 591.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, Donald T. and Julian C., STANLEY (1963) Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
FOLD VARY, L.A. and J.C., LANE (1964) “The Effects of Compulsory Safety Helmets on Motorcycle Accident Fatalities,” 21 Australian Road Research 7.Google Scholar
JAMIESON, K.G. and D.S., KELLY (1973) “Crash Helmets Reduce Head Injuries,” 2 Medical Journal of Australia 806.Google Scholar
LEWIN, W. and W.F.C., KENNEDY (1956) “Motorcyclists, Crash Helmets, and Head Injuries,” 1 British Medical Journal 253.Google Scholar
ROBERTSON, Leon S. (1976) “An Instance of Effective Legal Regulation: Motorcyclist Helmet and Headlamp Laws,” 10 Law & Society Review 467.Google Scholar
You have
Access