Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:08:56.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Obstacles to the Study of Lawyer-Client Interaction: The Biography of a Failure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2024

Brenda Danet ,
Kenneth B. Hoffman  and
Nicole C. Kermish
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper reports on an attempt by an interdisciplinary team to observe and record on tape lawyer-client interaction in the metropolitan Boston area in 1975-77. Current pressure for greater accountability to the public on the part of the legal profession makes the empirical, observational study of lawyer-client relations a timely, important topic. Despite the investment of much time and energy in creating conditions suitable for such a study, the project team failed to gain access to private lawyer-client encounters. The goal of the paper is to try to account for this failure, to analyze the nature of the obstacles encountered, and to stimulate speculation on how these obstacles might be overcome in the future. It is suggested that the doctrine of attorney-client privilege is the major obstacle which researchers must overcome. The idea of paying attorneys for their cooperation is also considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , Summer 1980 , pp. 905 - 922
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

*

Revised version of Working Paper #7, “Obstacles to the Study of Lawyer-Client Interaction,” Grant SOC-74–23503, National Science Foundation Law and Social Science Program, “The Role of Language in the Legal Process,” Boston University, 1975-1977.

References

References

ABEL, Richard L. (1979a) “Socializing the Legal Profession: Can Redistributing Lawyers' Services Achieve Social Justice?” 1 Law & Policy Quarterly 5.Google Scholar
ABEL, Richard L. (1979b) “Delegalization: A Critical Review of Its Ideology, Manifestations, and Social Consequences,” in Blankenburg, E., Klausa, E., and Rottleuthner, H. (eds.), Altemativen Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, 6 Jahrbuch für Techtssoziologie und Rechtsheorie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
ADLER, Keith (1977) “Review Essay: Doctor-Patient Communication: A Shift to Problem-Oriented Research,” 3 Human Communication Research 179.Google Scholar
AUERBACH, Jerold S. (1976) Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BERGER, Peter (1963) Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday-Anchor.Google Scholar
BRICKMAN, Lester and Richard O., LEMPERT (eds.) (1976) “Delivery of Legal Services,” 11 Law and Society Review 319.Google Scholar
CARLIN, Jerome (1962) Lawyers on Their Own: A Study of Individual Practitioners in Chicago. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
CARLSON, Rick J. (1976) “Measuring the Quality of Legal Services: An Idea Whose Time Has Not Come,” 11 Law and Society Review 287.Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda (in press) “‘Baby’ or ‘Fetus‘? Language and the Construction of Reality in a Manslaughter Trial,” Semiotica.Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda (1978) “Language in the Legal Process: An Overview,” paper presented at the Program in Sociolinguistics, World Congress of Sociology, interest group on “Language in the Legal Process,” Uppsala, Sweden, August 1978.Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda “Language in the Legal Process.” Commissioned review article for the Law and Society Review, special issue on “Contemporary Issues in Law and Social Science.”.Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda, HOFFMAN, Kenneth B., KERMISH, Nicole C., RAFN, H. Jeffrey and Deborah G., STAYMAN (1980) “An Ethnography of Questioning” in Shuy, Roger and Shnukal, Anna (eds.) Language Use and the Uses of Language: Papers from the Fifth Annual Colloquium on New Ways of Analyzing Variation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda and Nicole C., KERMISH (1978) “Courtroom Questioning: A Sociolinguistic Perspective,” in Massery, Louis N. II (ed.), Psychology and Persuasion in Advocacy. Washington, D.C.: Association of Trial Lawyers of America, National College of Advocacy.Google Scholar
DONNELL, John D. (1970) The Corporate Counsel: A Role Study. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
EDELMAN, Murray (1977) Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
GOODPASTER, Gary S. (1978) “The Human Arts of Lawyering: Interviewing and Counseling,” in Massery, Louis N. II. (ed.), Psychology and Persuasion in Advocacy. Washington, D.C.: Association of Trial Lawyers of America, National Council of Advocacy.Google Scholar
HAUG, Marie R. (1975) “The Deprofessionalization of Everyone?” 8 Sociological Focus 197.Google Scholar
ILLICH, Ivan (1977a) Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health. Toronto: Bantam Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILLICH, Ivan (1977b) Disabling Professions. London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
JOHNSTONE, Quintin and Dan, HOPSON Jr. (1967) Lawyers and Their Work: An Analysis of the Legal Profession in the United States and England. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
LIEBERMAN, Jethro K. (1970) The Tyranny of the Experts: How Professionals Are Closing the Open Society. New York: Walker.Google Scholar
LIEBERMAN, Jethro K. (1978) Crisis at the Bar: Lawyers' Unethical Ethics And What to Do About It. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
MARU, Olavi (1972) Research on the Legal Profession: A Review of Work Done. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
MELLINKOFF, David (1963) The Language of the Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
NADER, Ralph and Mark, GREEN (eds.) (1976) Verdicts on Lawyers. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW (1974) “Developments in Law and Social Sciences Research,” Assessment Conference Sponsored by the National Science Foundation, 52 The North Carolina Law Review 969.Google Scholar
O'GORMAN, Hubert (1963) Lawyers and Matrimonial Cases: A Study of Informal Pressures in Private Professional Practice. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
PROBERT, Walter (1972) Law, Language and Communication. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
REHBINDER, Manfred (1972) “Sociology of Law: Trend Report and Bibliography,” 20 Current Sociology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROSENTHAL, Douglas E. (1974) Lawyer and Client: Who's in Charge? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
ROSENTHAL, Douglas E. (1976) “Evaluating the Competence of Lawyers,” 11 Law and Society Review 257.Google Scholar
SMIGEL, Erwin O. (1964) The Wall Street Lawyer: Professional Organization Man? Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
TIME (1978) “Those #X!!! Lawyers!” Time cover story, April 10.Google Scholar
TISHER, Sharon, Lynn, BERNABEI, and Mark, GREEN (1977) Bringing the Bar to Justice: A Comparative Study of Six Bar Associations. Washington D.C.: The Public Citizen.Google Scholar
WAITZKIN, H. and J.D., STOECKLE (1972) “The Communication of Information about Illness,” 8 Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOOD, Arthur Lewis (1967) Criminal Lawyer. New Haven, Conn.: College and University Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Richards of Rockford, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company et. al., ND Calif. C-74-0578-CBR, 1976.Google Scholar