Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:02:09.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Litigation and Moral Consciousness in Japan an Interpretive Analysis of Four Japanese Pollution Suits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2024

Frank K. Upham
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the two years from June 20, 1971, to March 10, 1973, Japanese courts decided four pollution injury suits colloquially known in Japan as the “big four.” This litigation and the social and political movements that accompanied it are of great interest from several perspectives, including the doctrinal development of Japanese tort law. This article, however, will focus not on the legal or political impact of the litigation, but on the way in which cultural and social factors influenced its course. I attempt to illuminate thereby a side of the Japanese legal system that is ordinarily hidden from view, i.e., the interface of modern Japanese society and the formal legal system.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , Summer 1976 , pp. 579 - 619
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 The Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

*

I wish to thank Professor Jerome A. Cohen of Harvard Law School, Professor Akio Morishima of Nagoya University and Professors Zentaro Kitagawa and Yasuhei Taniguchi of Kyoto University for their encouragement and guidance in the development of this paper.

References

AWAJI, Takehisa (1973) “Yontai Kōgai Saiban ni mini Sekininron” [Liability Doctrine in the Big Four Pollution Decisions], 45 Hōritsu Jihō 21 (May).Google Scholar
BALBUS, ISAAC D. (1973) The Dialectics of Legal Repression. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
BENDIX, Richard (1962) Max Weber, An Intellectual Portrait. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
BORTON, Hugh (1938) “Peasant Uprisings in Japan in the Tokugawa Period,” 10 Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan (2nd Series) 1.Google Scholar
DOI, Takeo (1973) The Anatomy of Dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1975) “Afterword: Explaining Litigation;’ 9 Law & Society Review 349.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1975) “Delivering Legality: Some Proposals for the Direction of Research.” Presented at the Conference on a ”Research Agenda for Better Meeting the Needs of Consumers of Legal Services“ at Ponte Vedra, Florida (December 4-6).Google Scholar
GIDDENS, Anthony (1971) Capitalism and Modern Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAHM, PYONG-CHOON (1969) ”The Decision Process in Korea,“ in Schubert, G. and Danelski, D. (eds.) Comparative Judicial Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
HENDERSON, Dan Fenno (1968) “Law and Political Modernization in Japan,” in Ward, R. (ed.) Political Development in Modern Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
HIRANO, Katsuaki (1973) “Kōgai Hanketsu ni okeru Inga Kankei Ron” [The Causation Doctrine in the Pollution Judgments], 45 Hōritsu Jihō 42 (May).Google Scholar
JURISTO (1972a) “Yokkaichi Kōgai ni okeru Jūmin Katsudō” [Symposium: The Residents’ Activities in the Yokkaichi Pollution Case], 514 Juristo 134.Google Scholar
JURISTO (1972b) “Yokkaichi Kōgai Soshō ni okeru Soshō Katsudō” [Symposium: Legal Activities in the Yokkaichi Pollution Case], 514 Juristo 102.Google Scholar
JUN, Ui (1972) “The Singularities of Japanese Pollution,” 19 Japan Quarterly 281.Google Scholar
KANO, Tsutomu (1973) “Peasant Uprisings and Citizen Revolts,” 8 The Japan Interpreter 279.Google Scholar
KAWASHIMA, Takeyoshi (1963) “Dispute Resolution in Contemporary Japan,” in Mehren, A. von (ed.) Law in Japan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
KAWASHIMA, Takeyoshi (1964) Katei no Hōritsu [Family Law]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
KAWASHIMA, Takeyoshi (1967) Nipponjin no Hōishiki [The Legal Consciousness of the Japanese]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1966) Law and the Balance of Power. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
NAKAI (1973), ”Minamatabyō Hanketsu no Mimaikin Keiyaku“ [Mimaikin Contracts and the Minamata Disease Judgments], 45 Hōritsu Jihō 6 (May).Google Scholar
ONO, Eiji (1972) “Shimin Undō to Bengoshi” [Peopled Movements and Lawyers], 23 Jiyu to Seigi 7.Google Scholar
RABINOWITZ, Richard (1968) “Law and the Social Process in Japan,” 10 Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan (3rd Series) 5. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
RHEINSTEIN, Max (1954) “Introduction” in Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
ROSS, H. Laurence (1970) Settled Out of Court. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
ROTH, Guenther (1971) “The Historical Relationship to Marxism” in Bendix, R. and Roth, G. (eds.) Scholarship and Partisanship: Essays on Max Weber. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
RUDOLPH, Lloyd I., and Susanne Hoeber, RUDOLPH (1967) The Modernity of Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
SAWAI, Yutaka (1973) “Kōgai Hanketsu ni okeru Riron no Shinten” [New Doctrinal Developments in the Pollution Judgments], 45 Hōritsu Jihō 13 (May).Google Scholar
SMITH, Eugene W. (1974) “Minamata Japan: Life—Sacred and Profane,” 18 Camera 35 (26 April).Google Scholar
SMITH, Thomas C. (1959) The Agrarian Origins of Modern Japan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
STEVENS, Charles (1971) “Modern Japanese Law as an Instrument of Comparison,” 19 American Journal of Comparative Law 665.Google Scholar
THURSTON, Donald (1975) “Aftermath in Minamata,” 10 The Japan Interpreter 25.Google Scholar
TINNIN, David B. (1973) Just About Everybody Vs. Howard Hughes. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
TRUBEK, David (1972) “Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism,” 1972 Wisconsin Law Review 720.Google Scholar
TSUCHIMOTO, Noriaki [Director] (1972) “Minamata: The Victims and Their World.” Tokyo: Higashi Productions. A script of a motion picture, on file with the author.Google Scholar
USHIYAMA, Tsumoru (1970) “Kōgai ni okeru Ingakankei” [Causation in Pollution Cases], 458 Juristo 380 (August 10).Google Scholar
USHIYAMA, Tsumoru (1973) “Kumamoto Minamatabyo Hanketsu to Oakusui Ron” [The Minamata Decision and the ”Oakusui“ Doctrine], 45 Hōritsu Jihō 27 (May).Google Scholar
WEBER, Max (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. (Translated by A. Henderson and T. Parsons) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
WEBER, Max (1954) Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. (Translated by M. Rheinstein and E. Shils) Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
YAMAGUCHI (1971) Sangyō Kōgai to Kisei [Industrial Pollution and Regulation]. Tokyo: Nihonkeizai Shinbun Sha.Google Scholar