Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:15:11.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law, Change, and Litigation: A Critical Examination of an Empirical Research Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Frank Munger
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article examines the theory and empirical methods of recent studies of law and litigation. It argues that the recent interest in longitudinal studies of trial court dockets proceeds from a deeply rooted functionalist theoretical tradition in empirical work on courts. Functionalist theory, through its sophisticated application in the work of James Willard Hurst, is described as the direct or indirect source of theory for longitudinal litigation studies. Though there are many reasons for suspecting that fuctionalist theory is inadequate, it has seldom been rejected through proper empirical testing of its hypotheses. The theory, often poorly conceptualized, is discussed here in detail. Hypotheses derived from a careful reading of Hurst and others are operationalized, employing data from the dockets of three West Virginia trial courts between 1870 and 1925, and a test of the hypotheses is constructed taking advantage of the historical variation in the economic development of three neighboring counties. Conclusions supported by the analysis of these data are largely prophylactic. Research can address the widespread problems of poor conceptualization and data analysis that have limited the value of much longitudinal trial court docket research. If court function is to continue to be the focus, theory, it is argued, must take account of the social organization of relations between litigants outside the courts, as well as the organization of the courts themselves. Data analysis must address the measurement of the power, litigation capacity, and perception of usefulness of litigation held by litigants. Illustrating the value of hypothesis testing as employed here, it is contended, these conclusions about appropriate future directions and methods for longitudinal court docket research are based on properly supported findings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , 1988 , pp. 57 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by The Law and Society Association

References

BLACK, D. (1976) The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BLACK, D. (1970) “The Production of Crime Rates,” 35 American Sociological Review 733.Google Scholar
BLANKENBURG, Erhard (1982) “Legal Insurance, Litigant Decisions, and the Rising Caseloads of Courts: A West German Study,” 16 Law & Society Review 601.Google Scholar
BOHANNAN, Paul (1967) “The Differing Realms of the Law,” in Bohannan, P. (ed.), Law and Warfare. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
DANIELS, Stephen (1985) “Continuity and Change in Patterns of Case Handling: A Case Study of Two Rural Counties,” 19 Law & Society Review 381.Google Scholar
DIAMOND, Stanley (1971) “The Rule of Law Versus the Order of Custom,” 38 Social Research 42.Google Scholar
DURKHEIM, Emile (1947) The Division of Labor in Society, trans. Simpson, G.. New York: Free Press. [Orig. publ. 1893.].Google Scholar
ENGEL, David M. (1984) “The Oven Bird's Song: Insiders, Outsiders, and Personal Injuries in an American Community,” 18 Law & Society Review 551.Google Scholar
FELS, Rendigs (1959) American Business Cycles, 1865–1897. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1986) Total Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1965) Contract Law in America: A Social and Economic Case Study. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M., and Jack, LADINSKY (1967) “Social Change and the Law of Industrial Accidents,” 67 Columbia Law Review 50.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M., and Robert, PERCIVAL (1976) “A Tale of Two Courts: Litigation in Alameda and San Benito Counties,” 10 Law & Society Review 267.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1983a) “The Radiating Effects of Courts,” in Boyum, K. and Mather, L. (eds.), Empirical Theories About Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Mather, L. (1983b) “Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don't Know (and Think We Know) About Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society,” 31 UCLA Law Review 1.Google Scholar
GENOVESE, Eugene D. (1985) “Law and the Economy in Capitalist America: Questions for Mr. Hurst on the Occasion of His Curti Lectures,” 1985 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 113.Google Scholar
GORDON, Robert W. (1976) “Introduction: J. Willard Hurst and the Common Law Tradition in American Legal Historiography,” 10 Law & Society Review 9.Google Scholar
GOULDNER, Alvin W. (1970) The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
GRAEBNER, William (1976) Coal Mining Safety in the Progressive Era. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
GRAEBNER, William (1973) “Great Expectations: The Search for Order in Bituminous Coal, 1890–1917,” 56 Business History Review 49.Google Scholar
GROSSMAN, Joel, and Austin, SARAT, (1975) “Litigation in the Federal Courts: A Comparative Perspective,” 9 Law & Society Review 321.Google Scholar
HARRING, Sidney L., and Barry R., STRUTT (1985) “Lumber, Law, and Social Change: The Legal History of Willard Hurst,” 1985 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 123.Google Scholar
HURST, James Willard (1964) Law and Economic Growth: The Legal History of the Lumber Industry in Wisconsin, 1836–1915. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
KAGAN, Robert A. (1984) “The Routinization of Debt Collection: An Essay on Social Change and Conflict in the Courts,” 18 Law & Society Review 323.Google Scholar
KIDDER, Robert L. (1980–81) “The End of the Road? Problems in the Analysis of Disputes,” 15 Law & Society Review 717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KOLKO, Gabriel (1963) The Triumph of Conservatism: A Reinterpretation of American History, 1900–1916. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW (1980–81) “Special Issue on Dispute Processing and Civil Litigation,” 15 Law & Society Review 1.Google Scholar
LEMPERT, Richard (1978) “More Tales of Two Courts: Exploring Changes in the ‘Dispute Settlement Function’ of Trial Courts,” 13 Law & Society Review 91.Google Scholar
LEMPERT, Richard (1972) “Norm-Making in Social Exchange: A Contract Law Model,” 7 Law & Society Review 1.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1966) Law and the Balance of Power: The Automobile Manufacturers and Their Dealers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1963) “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Review 55.Google Scholar
MCINTOSH, Wayne (1983) “Private Use of a Public Forum: A Long-Range View of the Dispute Processing Role of Courts,” 77 American Political Science Review 991.Google Scholar
MATHER, Lynn, and Barbara, YNGVESSON (1981) “Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes,” 15 Law & Society Review 775.Google Scholar
MAYHEW, Leon H. (1968) Law and Equal Opportunity: A Study of the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MILLER, Richard E. and Austin, SARAT (1980–81) “Grievances, Claims, and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture,” 15 Law & Society Review 525.Google Scholar
MILLER, William (1970) History of Summers County. Parsons, WV: McClain Printing Co.Google Scholar
PARSONS, Talcott (1964) “A Sociologist Looks at the Legal Profession,” in Parsons, T. (ed.), Essays in Sociological Theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
ROSTOW, W. (1948) British Economy of the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
SCHUR, Edwin M. (1968) Law and Society: A Sociological View. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
SMELSER, Neil J. (1959) Social Change in the Industrial Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
TOHARIA, José (1973) “Economic Development and Litigation: The Case of Spain.” Presented to the Conference on the Sociology of Judicial Process, University of Bielefeld, West Germany (September).Google Scholar
TRUBEK, David M. (1980–81) “Studying Courts in Context,” 15 Law & Society Review 485.Google Scholar
TRUBEK, David M. (1972) “Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism,” 1972 Wisconsin Law Review 720.Google Scholar
TUSHNET, Mark (1972) “Lumber and the Legal Process,” 1972 Wisconsin Law Review 114.Google Scholar
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (1975) Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, Series V-23. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
WEBER, Max (1967) Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society, ed. Rheinstein, M.. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
WEINSTEIN, James (1968) The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State, 1900–1918. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
ZEITLIN, Irvin M. (1973) Rethinking Sociology: A Critique of Contemporary Theory. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.Google Scholar