Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:28:50.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Study of Law in Society in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2024

C.M. Campbell
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast
Paul Wiles
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1968 Renato Treves and J.F. Glastra van Loon edited Norms and Actions, a book of essays by indigenous scholars describing “law and society” research in their countries. No account of work in Britain was included, probably because there was so little activity in the field at that time. Yet only eight years later remarkable changes seem to have occurred. Courses at undergraduate and postgraduate level have proliferated; the number of empirical research projects is expanding; new centers and institutes have been established, series of books and a specialist journal have been launched, and financial and institutional support is provided by the universities, research councils, and through governmental initiatives. Not too long ago Lon Fuller (1967:1) suggested that the growth of interest in studying the operation of the law in American society had “come to assume the proportions of something like an intellectual movement.” Some commentators are tempted to perceive recent British developments in like fashion. But whatever the truth of Fuller's analysis of the American setting, it is dangerous to apply it to the situation in Britain. It would be reassuring to think that British academics simply discovered (rather later than elsewhere) a novel field of inquiry and boldly set out to explore it, and that the clamor of current activity indicates a vigorous beginning has been made. This would allow us to predict a healthy future and the rapid enhancement of our understanding of the nature and operation of law. It is just as plausible, however, to regard the current developments as fortuitous and perhaps transitional—the product of a curious concatenation of institutional, political and social influences.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 The Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

*

We wish to thank Marc Galanter for helpful advice and editorial assistance in the preparation of this article.

References

ABEL, Richard L. (1973) “Law Books and Books about Law” (Review article of M. Reinstein: Marriage, Stability, Divorce and Law (1972) University of Chicago Press) 26 Stanford Law Review, 175.Google Scholar
ABEL-SMITH, Brian and STEVENS, Robert (1967) Lawyers and the Courts. London: Heineman.Google Scholar
ABEL-SMITH, Brian (1968) In Search of Justice. London: Alan Lane.Google Scholar
ABEL-SMITH, Brian, Michael, ZANDER and Rosalinde, BROOKE (1973) Legal Problems and the Citizen. London: Heineman Educational Books.Google Scholar
ABRAMS, Philip (1968) The Origins of British Sociology 1834-1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
ADLER, Michael and Anthony, BRADLEY (eds.) (1976) Justice, Discretion and Poverty. London: Professional Books.Google Scholar
ALBROW, Martin (1975) “Legal Positivism and Bourgeois Materialism: Max Weber's view of the Sociology of Law.” Vol. 2. British Journal of Law and Society 14.Google Scholar
ANDERSON, P. (1971) The Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
ASHBY, (Sir) Eric, and M., ANDERSON (1970) The Rise of the Student Estate in Britain. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
BAILEY, R. and M., BRAKE (1975) Radical Social Work, Farnsworth Saxon House.Google Scholar
BANKOWSKI, Z. and G., MUNGHAM (1976) Images of Law. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
BEAN, Philip (1974) The Social Control of Drugs. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
BENDIX, Reinhard (1966) Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1973) “The Boundaries of Legal Sociology” in Black, D. and Mileski, M. (eds.) The Social Organization of Law. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
BLOM-COOPER, L.J. and G., DREWRY (1972) The Final Appeal: A Study of the House of Lords in its judicial capacity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
BOTTOMS, A.E. and McCLEAN, J.D. (1976) Defendants in the Criminal Process. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
BRIDGES, Lee, Brenda, SUFRIN, Jim, WHETTON and Richard, WHITE (1975) Legal Services in Birmingham. Birmingham: Institute of Judicial Administration, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
BRYSON, Gladys (1945) Man and Society. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
BYLES, A. and P., MORRIS (1975) Unmet Need: The case of the neighbourhood law centre. London: Legal Advice Research Unit (mimeo).Google Scholar
CAIN, Maureen (1974) “The problem of the teaching of sociology of law in U.K.” Unpublished paper presented to the Research Committee on Sociology of Law at the 8th World Congress of the International Sociological Association, Toronto (August).Google Scholar
CAIN, Maureen (1975) “Rich Man's Law or Poor Man's Law?” 2 British Journal of Law and Society 61.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, C.M. (1974(a)) “Legal Thought and Juristic Values” Vol. 1 British Journal of Law and Society 13.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, C.M. (1974(b)) Review of Lloyd's Introduction to Jurisprudence (1972 infra) 13 Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law 55.Google Scholar
CARLEN, Pat (1976) Magistrates Courts. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
CARSON, W.G. (1974(a)) “Symbolic and Instrumental Dimensions of early Factory Legislation: A case study in the social origins of legislation” in Hood, R.G. (ed.) Crime, Criminology and Public Policy. London: Heineman.Google Scholar
CARSON, W.G. (1974(b)) “The Sociology of Crime and the emergence of Criminal Laws” in P. Rock and M. Mcintosh Deviance and Social Control. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
COHEN, Stanley (ed.) (1971) Images of Deviance. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
COHEN, Stanley (1974) “Criminology and the Sociology of Deviance in Britain—a recent history and current report” in Rock, P. and Macintosh, M. (eds.) Deviance and Social Control. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
COMMITTEE ON LEGAL EDUCATION, GREAT BRITAIN (1971) Report. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Cmnd. 4595 (The Ormrod Report).Google Scholar
CORNISH, William (1974) “Jury Research: Achievements and Prospects.” An unpublished paper presented to the Socio-Legal Group Conference, Manchester, England (January).Google Scholar
COTTERRELL, R.B.M. and J.C., WOODLIFFE (1974) uThe Teaching of Jurisprudence in British Universities,“ 13 Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law 73.Google Scholar
DIAS, R.W.M. (1970) Jurisprudence (3rd ed.). London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
ELSTON, Elizabeth, Jane, FULLER and Mervyn, MURCH (1975) “Judicial Hearings of undefended divorce petitions,” Vol. 38 Modern Law Review 609.Google Scholar
FOSTER, J. (1974) Class Struggles and the Industrial Revolution. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
FOSTER, Ken (1973) “The Location of Solicitors,” Vol. 36 Modern Law Review 153.Google Scholar
FROST, A. and C., MILTON (1975) Representation at Administrative Tribunals. London: Legal Advice Research Unit (mimeo).Google Scholar
FULLER, Lon (1967) “Some Unexplored social dimensions of the law” (mimeo). Unpublished paper presented to Symposium on Law and the Social Sciences, Harvard Law School (September).Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1973) “Notes on the Future of Social Research on Law.” Unpublished paper presented to Conference on Developments in Law and Social Science Research, University of North Carolina. (April).Google Scholar
GLUCKMAN, Max (1965(a)) The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence. New Haven: Yale U.P.Google Scholar
GLUCKMAN, Max (1965(b)) Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
GLUCKMAN, Max (1967) The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia (2nd ed.). Manchester U.P.Google Scholar
GROSSMAN, Joel B. (1966) “Social Backgrounds and Judicial Decision Making.” 79 Harvard Law Rev.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GROSSMAN, Joel B. (1968) “Dissenting Blocs in the Warren Court: A Study in Judicial Role Behaviour” 30 J. of Politics 1068.Google Scholar
GOULDNER, Alvin W. (1971) The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. London: Heineman.Google Scholar
GRACE, C. and P., WILKINSON (1975) Negotiating the Law: Legal Phenomena in Welfare Provision. London: Legal Advice Research Unit (mimeo).Google Scholar
GREEN, Robert W. (ed.) (1959) Protestantism and Capitalism: The. Weber Thesis and its Critics. Boston: D.C. Heath & Co.Google Scholar
GUNNINGHAM, Neil (1974) Pollution, Social Interest and the Law. London: Martin Robertson & Co.Google Scholar
HAMNET, Ian (1975): Chieftainship and Legitimacy—An anthropological study of executive law in Lesotho. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
HOBSBAWM, E. (1971): Primitive Rebels. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
KAHN-FREUND, Otto (1949) “Introduction,“ in Renner, Karl, The Institutions of Private Law and their Social Function.Google Scholar
KUPER, Adam (1975) Anthropologists and Anthropology: The British School 1922-1972. London: Peregrin Books.Google Scholar
LEHMAN, William C. (1930) Adam Ferguson and the Beginnings of Modern Sociology. London: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEHMAN, William C. (1952) “John Millar, Historical Sociologist,” 3 British Journal of Sociology 30.Google Scholar
LLOYD (Lord of Hampstead) (1972) Introduction to Jurisprudence (3rd ed.). London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
MALINOWSKI, Bronislav (1926) Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
McCABE, Sarah & Robert, PURVES (1972(a)) Bypassing the Jury. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
McCABE, Sarah (1972(b)) The Jury at Work. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
McCABE, Sarah (1974 The Shadow Jury at Work. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
McGREGOR, O.R., L.J., BLOM-COOPER and C., GIBSON (1970) Separated Spouses: A study of the matrimonial jurisdiction of Magistrates Court. London: Duckworths.Google Scholar
MacKENZIE, W.J.M. (1967) Politics and Social Science. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
MEEK, R.L. (1954) “The Scottish Contribution to Marxist Sociology,” in Saville, J. (ed.) Democracy in the Labour movement. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
MORRIS, Pauline (1973(a)) ”A Sociological Approach to Research in Legal Services,“ in Morris, P., White, R. and Lewis, P., Social Needs and Legal Action. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
MORRIS, Pauline (1973(b)) ”Access to What, to Whom and Why?“ An unpublished paper presented to the Sociology of Law Research Committee, 7th World Congress of the International Sociological Association, Cambridge, England (September).Google Scholar
MORRIS, Pauline, Richard, WHITE and Philip, LEWIS (1973) Social Needs and Legal Action. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
MUNGHAM, G. (1974) “Legal Services, The Poor and the Politics of the English Legal Profession: A Study of Present Attempts to Bring Law to the People.” An unpublished paper presented to the SocioLegal Group Conference, Manchester, England (January).Google Scholar
NAGEL, Stuart S. (1969) The Legal Process from a Behavioral Perspective. Illionois: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
NISBET, Robert A. (1966) The Sociological Tradition. London: Hieneman.Google Scholar
PASCAL, Roy (1938) “Property and Society: The Scottish Historical School of the 18th century,” 2 Modern Quarterly 1.Google Scholar
PATON, G.W. and David P., DERHAM (1972) A Textbook of Jurisprudence (4th ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
PATERSON, A.A. (1974) “Judges: a political elite?” Vol. 1 British Journal of Law and Society 118.Google Scholar
PAULUS, Ingeborg (1975) The Search for Pure Food. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
RENNER, Karl (1949) The Institutions of Private Law and their Social Function (reprint 1976). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
ROCK, Paul and McINTOSH, Mary (eds.) (1974) Deviance and Social Control. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
RUDE, G. (1970) Paris and London in the Eighteenth Century. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
RUSSELL, Bertrand (1946) The History of Western Philosophy. London: Alan and Unwin.Google Scholar
SAYRE, Wallace S. & Herbert, KAUFMAN (1960) Governing New York City. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
SCHUBERT, Glendon (ed) (1964) Judicial Behavior: A Reader in Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand & McNally.Google Scholar
SCHUBERT, Glendon and David J., DANELSKI (eds.) (1969): Comparative Judicial Behaviour. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
SHKLAR, Judith (1964) Legalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL (1972) 14 Newsletter.Google Scholar
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL (1976) 30 Newsletter.Google Scholar
STOLJAR, S.J. (1961) “Weber's Sociology of Law” in Sawer, G. (ed.) Sociology of Law. Canberra: Australian National University (mimeo).Google Scholar
STEDMAN-JONES, Gareth (1971) Outcast London. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
STONE, Julius (1964) Legal System and Lawyer's Reasonings. London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
STONE, Julius (1965) Human Justice. London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
STONE, Julius (1966) Social Dimensions of Law and Justice. London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
SUMMERS, Robert S. (1968) “Legal Philosophy Today—An Introduction” in Summers, R.S. (ed.): Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
TAYLOR, Ian & Laurie, TAYLOR (1973) Politics and Deviance. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
TAYLOR, Ian, Paul, WALTON and Jock, YOUNG (1973) The New Criminology. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
TAYLOR, Ian (1975) Critical Criminology. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
THOMAS, P.A. & G., MUNGHAM (1972) “English Legal Education: A Commentary on the Ormrod Report,” 7 Valparaiso Law Review 87.Google Scholar
THOMPSON, E.P. (1969) The Making of the English Working Class. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
THOMPSON, E.P. (1975) Whigs and Hunters. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
THOMPSON, E.P., D., HAYE and R., LINBAUGH (1975) Albian's Fatal Tree. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
TREVES, Renato and Glastra VAN LOON, J.F. (eds.) (1968) Norms and Actions: National Reports on Sociology of Law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TRUBEK, D.M. (1972) “Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism,” 1972 Wisconsin Law Review 720.Google Scholar
TWINING, W. (1974) “Some Jobs for Jurisprudence,” Vol. 1 British Journal of Law and Society 149.Google Scholar
WEBER, Max (1954) Max Weber on Law and Economy in Society (M. Rheinstein ed.). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
WHITE, Richard (1975) “The Distasteful Character of Litigation for Poor Persons,” Juridical Review 233.Google Scholar
WILES, P.N.P. (ed) (1976) The Sociology of Crime and Delinquency in Britain Vol. The Sociology of Crime and Delinquency in Britain Vol: The New Criminologies. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
WILLOCK, I.D. (1972) “Getting on with Social Scientists.” An unpublished paper presented to the Socio-Legal Group conference, Manchester, England (December).Google Scholar
WILLOCK, I.D. (1974) “Getting on with Sociologists,” Vol. 1 British Journal of Law and Society 3.Google Scholar
WILSON, J.F. (1966) “Survey of Legal Education in the United Kingdom,” 9 Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law 1.Google Scholar
WILSON, J.F. and Marsh, S.D. (1975) “A Survey of Legal Education in the United Kingdom,” 13 Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law 239.Google Scholar
WINKLER, J.T. (1975) “Law, State and Economy: The Industry Act 1975 in Context,” Vol. 2 British Journal of Law in Society 103.Google Scholar
YOUNG, Jock (1971) The Drug Takers. London: Paladin.Google Scholar
ZANDER, Michael (1967) “Discovering Bail Applicants' Backgrounds,” The New Law Journal 921.Google Scholar
ZANDER, Michael (1968) Lawyers and the Public Interest. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
ZANDER, Michael (1969) “The Legal Profession and the Poor,” 20 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 109.Google Scholar
ZANDER, Michael and C., GLASSER (1967) “A Study in Representation,” New Law Journal 815.Google Scholar