Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Law & Social Inquiry
  4. Volume 28
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Volume 28 - Fall 2003

Contents

Page 3 of 3

Front matter

  • LSI volume 28 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 December 2018, pp. f1-f6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Review Symposium on the 25th Anniversary of Horwitz's Transformation I

Review Symposium on Robert Burns's A Theory of the Trial

  • A Response to Four Readings of A Theory of the Trial

  • Robert P. Burns
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 December 2018, pp. 553-567

  • My goal in A Theory of the Trial was a “rational reconstruction” of the American trial. I began with the conviction that the trial is, in some sense, a successful enterprise. The evidence for this proposition is spread throughout the book and is basically of three sorts—testimony of those who are experienced participant observers, social scientific findings, and the very account of the trial provided in the book. The latter contributes an argument that the trial's “consciously structured hybrid” of languages and practices is consistent with, indeed effectively realizes, intellectual and moral resources that interpret “our considered judgments of justice” (Rawls 1971, 19-20). All of us, even social scientists, always already affirm most of those considered judgments of justice when we think practically, as we must. Not that they are beyond criticism, but we have no Archimedian point or principle from which to criticize them all at once. Since modern people know that we are responsible for our public institutions, we need a mode of practical discourse (at the “metalevel”) by which to understand and evaluate institutions and the practices that occur within them. My book is an attempt at such discourse, and more than one reader has noticed that the argument has a reflexive quality. The book's method itself parallels at a higher level of abstraction the intensely practical discourse that occurs at trial.

Review Symposium on the 25th Anniversary of Horwitz's Transformation I

Back matter

  • LSI volume 28 issue 3 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 December 2018, pp. b1-b5
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Review Essay

Review Symposium on the 25th Anniversary of Horwitz's Transformation I

Review Essay

Book Notes

Front matter

  • LSI volume 28 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 December 2018, pp. f1-f6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Book Notes

Back matter

  • LSI volume 28 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 December 2018, pp. b1-b4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Other

Front matter

  • LSI volume 28 issue 4 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 December 2018, pp. f1-f8
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back matter

  • LSI volume 28 issue 4 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 December 2018, pp. b1-b11
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 3 of 3