Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T20:29:26.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

(When) Are Rights Wrong? Rights Discourses and Indeterminacy in Gay and Lesbian Parents' Custody Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Kimberly D. Richman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the paradoxical and problematic position of rights discourses in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) parents' custody and adoption cases. In it, I analyze the ways in which different types of rights are framed by the litigants and, alternatively, by the judges, as well as how the same constitutional rights (e.g., the right to privacy) are often deployed both in defense of and in opposition to gay /lesbian parents. An in-depth analysis of judicial decisions over a 50-year period and interviews with key family law players reveal the indeterminacy and therefore complexity of rights as a strategy and a discourse in the family law context. Consistent throughout this analysis are the problematic intersection of the collective and the individual in rights-based claims, and evidence of the distinct nature of LGBT rights claims as revolutionary in both their bases and their implications. The analysis confirms in some ways, but also contradicts and complicates many assertions of the “rights critique” of the past two decades. It also suggests a more complex and less dichotomous relationship between rights, status, and contract.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , Winter 2005 , pp. 137 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2005 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakan, Joel. 1997. Just Words: Constitutional Rights and Social Wrongs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Neil S. 1994. Taking Relationships Seriously: Children, Autonomy, and the Right to a Relationship. New York University Law Review 69:1150–75.Google Scholar
Bonini-Baraldi, Matteo. 2002. Sexual Orientation Discrimination and Family Law: Variations on the Theme of Status and Contract. Paper presented at the Law and Society Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, May 30.Google Scholar
Bower, Lisa. 1994. Queer Acts and the Politics of “Direct Address”: Rethinking Law, Culture, and Community. Law and Society Review 28:1009–34.Google Scholar
Cain, Patricia A. 2000. Rainbow Rights: The Role of Lawyers and Courts in the Lesbian and Gay Civil Rights Movement. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Daly, Kathleen. 1995. Structure and Practice of Familial-Based Justice in a Criminal Court. In The Law and Society Reader, ed. Richard, Abel. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Dudas, Jeffrey. 2002. On the Cultural Limits of American Rights Practice: Treaty Rights, Progressive Politics, and Equality's Enduring Call. Paper resented at the Law and Society Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, May 31.Google Scholar
Engel, David M., and Frank, W. Munger. 2001. Re-Interpreting the Effects of Rights: Career Narratives and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Ohio Stale Law Journal 62:285–333.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1999. Gaylaw. Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Susan, S. Silbey. 1995. Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative. Law and Society Review 29:197–226.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha L. 1989. The Politics of Custody and Gender: Child Advocacy and the Transformation of Custody Decision Making in the USA. In Child Custody and the Politics of Gender, ed. Carol, Smart and Selma, Sevenhuijsen. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fleming, Sharon J. 1997. Custody Standards in New Mexico: Between Third Parties and Biological Parents, What is the Trend New Mexico Law Review 27:547–78.Google Scholar
Gerstmann, Evan. 2002. Review of The Limits to Union: Same-Sex Marriage and the Politics of Civil Rights, by Jonathan Goldberg-Hiller. The Law and Politics Book Review 12:176–77.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1991. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg-Hiller, Jonathan. 2001. “Making a Mockery of Marriage”: Domestic Partnership and Equal Rights in Hawaii.” In Stychin and Herman 2001.Google Scholar
Goldberg-Hiller, Jonathan. 2002. The Limits to Union: Same-Sex Marriage and the Politics of Civil Rights. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter. 1987. Legal Discourse. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johnson, Rebecca, and Thomas, Kuttner. 2001. Treading on Dicey Grounds: Citizenship and the Politics of the Rule of Law. In Stychin and Herman 2001.Google Scholar
Kitsuse, John I. 1980. Coming Out All Over. Social Problems 28 (1):2–12.Google Scholar
Konvitz, Milton R. 2001. Fundamental Rights: History of a Constitutional Doctrine. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Lin, Timothy E. 1999. Social Norms and Judicial Decisionmaking: Examining the Role of Narratives in Same-Sex Adoption Cases. Columbia Law Review 99:739–94.Google Scholar
Loftus, Jeni. 2001. America's Liberation in Attitudes Toward Homosexuality, 1973–1988. American Sociological Review 66:762–82.Google Scholar
MacDougall, Bruce. 2000. Queer Judgments: Homosexuality, Expression, and the Courts in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine A. 1982. Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory. Signs 7 (3):515–44.Google Scholar
Maine, Sir Henry Sumner. 1917. Ancient Law. London: J.M. Dent &. Sons.Google Scholar
Mason, Mary Ann and Ann, Quirk. 1997. Are Mothers Losing Custody? Read My Lips: Trends in Judicial Decision-Making in Custody Disputes-1920, 1960, and 1995. Family Law Quarterly 31 (2):215–36.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory M. 2001. Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 1992. Language, Law, and Social Meanings: Linguistic/Anthropological Contributions to the Study of Law. Law and Society Review 26:413–45.Google Scholar
Milner, Neal, and Jonathan, Goldberg-Hiller. 2002. Special Rights Claims as a Momentary Advantage: Native Hawaiian Autonomy, U.S. Law, and International Politics. Paper presented at the Law and Society Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, May 31.Google Scholar
Moloney, Lawrie. 2001. Do Fathers “Win” or Do Mothers “Lose”? A Preliminary Analysis of Closely Contested Parenting Judgments in the Family Court of Australia. International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family 15:363–96.Google Scholar
Oberweis, Trish, and Michael, Musheno. 2001 Knowing Rights: State Actors' Stories of Power, Identity, and Morality. Aldershot, U.K: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Olsen, Frances. 1984. Statutory Rape: A Feminist Critique of Rights Analysis. Texas Law Review 63:387–432.Google Scholar
Papke, David R., and Kathleen, H. McManus. 1999. Narrative Jurisprudence: Narrative and the Appellate Opinion. Legal Studies Forum 23:449–65.Google Scholar
Phillips, Scott, and Ryken, Grattet. 2000. Judicial Rhetoric, Meaning-making, and the Institutionalism of Hate Crime Law. Law and Society Review 34:567–606.Google Scholar
Polan, Diane. 1982. Toward a Theory of Law and Patriarchy. In The Politics of Law, ed. David, Kairys. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Polikoff, Nancy. 2001. The Impact of Troxel v. Granville on Lesbian and Gay Parents. Rutgers Law Journal 32:825–900.Google Scholar
Richman, Kimberly. 2002. Lovers, Legal Strangers, and Parents: Negotiating Parental and Sexual Identity in Family Law. Law and Society Review 36:285–324.Google Scholar
Rifkin, Janet. 1980. Toward a Theory of Law and Patriarchy. Harvard Women's Law Journal 3:83–96.Google Scholar
Schacter, Jane S. 1994. The Gay Civil Rights Debate in the States: Decoding the Discourse of Equivalents. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 29:283–317.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Elizabeth M. 1986. The Dialectic of Rights and Politics: Perspectives for the Women's Movement. New York University Law Review 61:589–652.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Annamay T. 1985. Lesbian Mothers II: Long Night's Journey Into Day. Women's Rights Law Reporter 8:218–246.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Helena. 1999. Review of The Proliferation of Rights: Moral Progress or Empty Rhetoric? by Carl Wellman. American Political Science Review 93:965–67.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Helena. 2001. In the Matter of Anonymous, A Minor: Fetal Representation in Hearings to Waive Parental Consent for Abortion. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 11:69–111.Google Scholar
Stychin, Carl. 2003. Governing Sexuality: The Changing Politics of Citizenship and Law Reform. Portland: Hart.Google Scholar
Stychin, Carl, and Didi, Herman, eds. 2001. Law and Sexuality: The Global Arena. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1984. An Essay on Rights. Texas Law Review 62:1363–403.Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana. 2003. Law's Dream of a Common Knowledge. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wellman, Carl. 1999. The Proliferation of Rights: Moral Progress or Empty Rhetoric?. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
Westen, Peter. 1986. The Rueful Rhetoric of Rights. UCLA Law Review 33:977–1009.Google Scholar
Williams, Rhys H. 1995. Constructing the Public Good: Social Movements and Cultural Resources. Social Problems 42:124–44.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, Barbara. 1993. Hatching the Egg: A Child-Centered Perspective on Children's Rights. Cardozo Law Review 14:1747–864.Google Scholar