Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-96rnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T07:51:43.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visions of Fact; Languages of Evidence: History, Memory, and the Trauma of Legal Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Bill Maurer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , Autumn 2001 , pp. 893 - 909
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bentham, Jeremy. [1827] 1978. Rationale of Judicial Evidence. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Burton, David M. 1985. The History of Mathematics: An Introduction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Caruth, Cathy. 1988. The Force of Example: Kant's Symbols. Yale French Studies 74:17–37.Google Scholar
1990. The Claims of Reference. Yale Journal of Criticism 4 (1): 193–205.Google Scholar
1991. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma and the Possibility of History. Yak French Studies 79:181–92.Google Scholar
Collier, Jane, Maurer, Bill, and Suarez-Navaz, Liliana. 1995. Sanctioned Identities: Legal Constructions of Modern Personhood. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 2 (1 & 2):1–27.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. 1988. Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Marvelous Facts and Miraculous Evidence in Early-Modern Europe. Critical Inquiry 18(1):93–124.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter. 1995. Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. 1983. The Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul. 1986. The Resistance to Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1983. This Is Not a Pipe. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1939] 1967. Moses and Monotheism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lempert, Richard. 1988. The New Evidence Scholarship. In Probability and Inference in the Law of Evidence: The Uses and Limitations of Bayesianism, ed. Tillers, P. and Green, E. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. Forthcoming. The Perfidy of the Gaze and the Pain of Uncertainty: Anthropological Theory and the Search for Closure. In Transforming States, ed. Greenhouse, Carol, Mertz, Elizabeth, and Warren, Kay, Durham N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
1996. Recontextualization as Socialization: Text and Pragmatics in the Law School Classroom. In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. Silverstein, M. and Urban, G., pp. 229–49. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. 1998. A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Keams, Thomas R. 1992. A Journey Through Forgetting: Toward a Jurisprudence of Violence. In Law's Violence, ed. Sarat, A. and Kearns, T. Amherst Series in Law, Jurisprudence, and Social Thought. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Seigel, Michael L. 1994. A Pragmatic Critique of Modern Evidence Scholarship. Northwestern University Law Review 88: 995–1045.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara. 1991. “Beyond Reasonable Doubt” and “Probable Cause”: Historical Perspectives on the Anglo-American Law of Evidence. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sichel, Berta. 1997. Commentary on Kim Stringfellow. Urban Desires 3(1). Available at >http://www.desires.eom/3.1/3.1_toc.html<, last accessed 11 July 2001.http://www.desires.eom/3.1/3.1_toc.html<,+last+accessed+11+July+2001.>Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description. In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. Basso, Keith and Selby, Henry. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael, and Urban, Greg. 1996. The Natural History of Discourse. In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. Silverstein, M. and Urban, G., pp. 1–17. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1985. Discovering Social Control. Journal of Law and Society 12:111–34.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence. 1971. Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process. Harvard Law Review 84(6):1329–93.Google Scholar
Twining, William. 1994. Rethinking Evidence. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
West, Robin. 1991. Disciplines, Subjectivities, and the Law. In The Fate of Law, ed. Sarat, A. and Kearns, T. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Weston, Nancy A. 1997. The Fate, Violence, and Rhetoric of Contemporary Legal Thought: Reflections on the Amherst Series, the Loss of Truth, and the Law. Law and Social Inquiry 22 (3):733–808.Google Scholar
Wigmore, J. [1913] 1988. The Principles of judicial Proof. Littleton, Colo.: F. B. Rothman.Google Scholar