Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:14:15.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Weapons for the Weak? Democratizing the Force of Words in an Uncivil Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Orville Lee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

First Amendment absolutists and proponents of speech regulation are locked in a normative stalemate over the best way to diminish racial “hate speech.” I argue that this stalemate can be overcome by considering a more expansive theory of the “force of words” and the risks the right of free speech entails for individuals. Drawing on a cultural theory of symbolic power, I discuss the merits and limitations of two recent texts which redefine hate speech as discriminatory conduct. As an alternative to this strategy, I develop an analytical framework for describing the social risks the right of free speech entails, and propose juridical and deliberative-democratic remedies that might redistribute and attenuate these risks. Cultural and legal theory can find common ground in the analysis of the undemocratic effects of symbolic power. Such common ground can be achieved if legal theorists consider the force of words as a problem for democracy and if cultural theorists consider the resources provided by democratic institutions and practices for the redistribution of the social risks of speech.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , Autumn 2001 , pp. 847 - 890
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso, William, and Starr, Paul. 1987. The Politics of Numbers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1971. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Appiah, Kwame. 1992. Illusions of Race. In My Father's House. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. 2d ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 1996. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Competition, and Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. Hastings Law Journal 38:814–53.Google Scholar
1991. On Symbolic Power. In Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1996. Excitable Speech: The Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carter, Stephen L. 1991. Reflections of an Affirmative Action Baby. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L. 1996. Democracy, Difference, and the Right of Privacy. In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L., and Arato, Andrew. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davis, F. James. 1992. Who is Black? One Nation's Definition. University Park, Penn.: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard. 1993. Words that Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name Calling. In Matsuda et al. 1993.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Virginia. 1986. White by Definition: Social Classification in Creole Louisiana. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Feagin, Joe R., and Vera, Hernan. 1995. White Racism: The Basics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feagin, Joe R., Vera, Hernan, and Imanu, Nikitah. 1996. The Agony of Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Alessandro. 1998. Reflective Authenticity: Rethinking the Project of Modernity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
1991a. Politics and the Study of Discourse. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1991b. Governmentality. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Alan. 1989. Legitimizing Racial Discrimination through Antidiscrimination Law: A Critical Review of Supreme Court Doctrine. In Critical Legal Studies, ed. Hutchinson, Allan C. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gatewood, Willard B. 1990. Aristocrats of Color: The Black Elite, 1880–1920. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Colin. 1991. Governmental Rationality. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan. 1992. Foucault's Expulsion of Law: Toward a Retrieval. Law and Social Inquiry 17:1–38.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 1981. City Trenches: Urban Politics and the Patterning of Class in the United States Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kelman, Mark. 1987. A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Charles R. III. 1993. If He Hollers Let Him Go: Regulating Racist Speech on Campus. In Matsuda et al. 1993.Google Scholar
Lee, Orville. 1998. Culture and Democratic Theory: Toward a Theory of Symbolic Democracy. Constellations 5: 433–55.Google Scholar
Lofgren, Charles A. 1987. The Plessy Case: A Legal-Historical Interpretation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1993. Only Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J. 1993. Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story. In Matsuda et al. 1993.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J., Lawrence, Charles R. III, Delgado, Richard, and Crenshaw, KimberléWilliams. 1993. Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
Michaels, Walter Benn. 1995. Our America: Nativism, Modernism, and Pluralism. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Nobles, Melissa. 2000. Shades of Citizenship: Race and the Census in Modern Politics. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Omi, Michael, and Winant, Howard. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. 2d ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pierce, Jennifer L. 1995. Gender Trials: Emotional Lives in Contemporary Law Firms. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr. 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98:1–29.Google Scholar
Stone, Geoffrey R., Seidman, Louis M., Sunstein, Cass R., and Tushnet, Mark V. 1991. Constitutional Law. 2d ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 1986. Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review 51:273–86.Google Scholar
Taylor, John T. 1995. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. 2d ed. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. Vol. 2. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1987. Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar