Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:20:58.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Knowledge on Tap: Police Science and Common Knowledge in the Legal Regulation of Drunkenness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Although scholars have devoted considerable attention to the formation, modification, and dissemination of knowledges in and around the legal complex, few systematic inquiries have been made into the sociology of legal knowledges. In this paper, we focus on two areas of law–liquor licensing and drunk driving–and contextualize their development from the perspective of police science. We document the ways in which contemporary police science authorizes a “common knowledge,” which is not to be confused with lay knowledge, or even trade knowledge. Rather, the “common knowledge” that is authorized is what legal authorities believe everyone should know, despite any lay or trade knowledge individuals may have. This analysis demonstrates the need for further work on the ways in which knowledges are formed and authorized within law, with particular emphasis on documenting how a “responsibility to know” comes to be deployed beyond the state.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bardach, Eugene, and Kagan, Robert. 1982. Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Blake, Sara. 1992. Administrative Law in Canada. Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Blumberg, Abraham S. 1967. The Practice of Law as a Confidence Game: Organizational Cooptation of a Profession. Law and Society Review 1:1540.Google Scholar
Calkins, Raymond, ed. 1919. Substitutes for the Saloon. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cobb, Sara, and Rifkin, Janet. 1991. Practice and Paradox: Deconstructing Neutrality in Mediation. Law and Social Inquiry 16:3562.Google Scholar
Colquhoun, Patrick. [1806] 1969. A Treatise on the Police of the Metropolis. Montclair, N.J.: Patterson Smith.Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina. 1998. Governing out of Order: Space, Law, and the Politics of Belonging. London: Rivers Oram Press.Google Scholar
Ericson, Richard V., and Baranek, Patricia M. 1982. The Ordering of Justice: A Study of Accused Persons as Dependants in the Criminal Process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Evans, John, Janisch, Hudson, Mullan, David, and Risk, Richard. 1995. Administrative Law: Cases, Text, and Materials. 4th ed. Toronto: Emond Montgomery.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan. 1998. The Common Place of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999. Common Knowledge and Ideological Critique: The Significance of Knowing that the “Haves” Come Out Ahead. Law and Society Review 33:1025–42.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988. Politics and Reason. In Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings, 1977–1984, ed. Kritzman, Lawrence, 5785. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Govemmentality, ed. Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter, 87104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 1996. The Limits of the Sovereign State: Strategies of Crime Control in Contemporary Society. British Journal of Criminology 36:445–71.Google Scholar
Green, Andrew. 1997. How the Criminal Justice System Knows. Social and Legal Studies 6:522.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J., Yngvesson, Barbara, and Engel, David M. 1994. Law and Community in Three American Towns. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Leonard V., and Laine, Elizabeth. 1936. After Repeal: A Study of Liquor Law Administration. New York: Harper Brothers.Google Scholar
Herbert, Steve. 1997. Policing Space: Territoriality and the Los Angeles Police Department. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
House of Commons Debates. 27 March 1995. Honourable Allan Rock, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.Google Scholar
Janisch, Hudson, and Levi, Ron. 1997. Criminal Justice From the Bottom-Up: Some Thoughts on Police Rulemaking Processes. In The Province of Administrative Law, ed. Taggart, Michael, 243–78. Oxford, England: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 1995. Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1998. The Eye of Everyman: Witnessing DNA in the Simpson Trial. Social Studies of Science 28:713–40.Google Scholar
Ludington, John P. 1998. Annotation: Horizontal Gaze Syntagmus Test: Use in Impaired Driving Prosecution. American Law Reports 4th 60:1129–52.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 1998. The Discursive Production of Uncertainty: The OJ Simpson “Dream Team” and the Sociology of Knowledge Machine. Social Studies of Science 28:829–68.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Caroll J. 1999. Annotation: Competency of Nonexpert Witness to Testify, in Criminal Case, Based upon Personal Observation, as to Whether Person Was under the Influence of Drugs. American Law Reports 4th 21:905–17.Google Scholar
Novak, William. 1996. The People's Welfare: Law and Reguiation in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Oberweis, Trish, and Musheno, Michael. 1999. Policing Identities: Cop Decision Making and the Constitution of Citizens. Law and Social Inquiry 24:897923.Google Scholar
O'Malley, Pat. 1996. Risk and Responsibility. In Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo- Liberalism, and Rationalities of Government, ed. Barry, Andrew, Osborne, Thomas, and Rose, Nikolas, 189207. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Pasquale. 1991. “Theatrum Politicum”: The Genealogy of Capital–Police and the State of Prosperity. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter, 105–18. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. 1998. A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reich, Charles A. 1964. The New Property. Yale Law Journal 73:733–87.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas, and Miller, Peter. 1992. Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government. British Journal of Sociology 43:173205.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas, and Valverde, Mariana. 1998. Governed by Law Social and Legal Studies 7:541–51.Google Scholar
Shearing, Clifford, and Ericson, Richard. 1991. Culture as Figurative Action. British Journal of Sociology 42:482506.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. 1993. Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Underclass, 1890–1990. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sites, Clement M. L. 1899. Centralized Administration of Liquor Laws in the American Commonwealths. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Skolnick, Jerome H. 1994. Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. 3d ed. Toronto: Maxwell Macmillan Canada.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. A. 1919. Before the Bar: Prohibition, Pro and Con. Toronto: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Sudnow, David. 1965. Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender Office. Social Problems 12:255–76.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael, and Reiss, Albert J. Jr., eds. 1993. Beyond the Law: Crime in Complex Organizations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana. 1998. Diseases of the Will: Alcohol and the Dilemmas of Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Tony. 1997. Law, Common Sense, and the Authority of Science: Expert Witnesses and Criminal Insanity in England, ca. 1840–1940. Social and Legal Studies 6:343–62.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney, and Webb, Beatrice. [1903] 1963. The History of Liquor Licensing, Principally from 1700 to 1830. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara. 1993. Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zablocki, Christine A. 1997. Hospitality Law in Ontario: A Practical Guide. Toronto: Canada Law Book.Google Scholar