Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:11:59.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Old Habits Die Hard: Political Patronage and Remittance-Led Development in Guanajuato, Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Benjamin James Waddell
Benjamin James Waddell*
Affiliation:
Adams State University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present study analyzes the role of collective remittances in promoting democratic consolidation amid the decentralization of political decision making in Mexico. Specifically, 1 analyze how the remittance-matching program 3 × 1 para Migrantes conditions municipal politics in the state of Guanajuato, Mexico. To this end, I evaluate 3 × 1 para Migrantes investment patterns across Guanajuato's forty-six municipalities for the period 2001–2011. The results of my study indicate that, under the right conditions, remittances channeled through the 3 × 1 program stimulate higher levels of voter participation and in this manner have the potential to contribute to democratic growth. However, data patterns also indicate that 3 × 1 investments share a positive correlation with election cycles, demonstrating that local authorities may use the 3 × 1 program to garner political support. In this respect, my analysis calls into question the depth of democratic consolidation at the municipal level in the state of Guanajuato.

Resumo

Resumo

Este estudio analiza el efecto de las remesas colectivas en la promoción de la democracia en México, durante el periodo de descentralización política. En particular, se examina cómo el programa “3 × 1 para Migrantes” condiciona políticas municipales en el estado de Guanajuato, México. Para este propósito, se analizan las tendencias de inversiones del programa 3 × 1 en los cuarenta y seis municipios guanajuatenses, durante el periodo 2002–2011. Los resultados de este estudio indican que bajo las condiciones adecuadas, las remesas canalizadas por el programa 3 × 1 estimulan la participación electoral, y, de esa manera, tienen la capacidad de contribuir a avances democráticos. Sin embargo, las tendencias de los datos también indican que las inversiones del 3×1 mantienen una correlación positiva con los ciclos electorales, lo que sugiere que las autoridades locales usan el programa 3×1 para obtener apoyo electoral. En ese sentido, el análisis cuestiona el fenómeno de consolidación democrática a nivel municipal en el estado de Guanajuato.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , 2015 , pp. 5 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

I would like to acknowledge the García-Robles Fulbright program for providing initial funding for this project. In addition, I am grateful to Robert Fiala, Manuel García y Griego, Mark Finney, Manuel Burgos, and Grant Burrier for their invaluable input on earlier drafts of this paper and project. Special thanks go to Richard L. Wood and Matías Fontenla for being exceptional mentors and even better friends. Finally, I would like to thank my wife, Beatriz Amanda García Waddell, for challenging me to be a better person day in and day out. She is, without a doubt, my better half.

References

Adelman, Irma, Taylor, J. Edward, and Vogel, Stephen 1988 “Life in a Mexican Village: A SAM perspective.” Journal of Development Studies 25 (1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aparicio, Javier, and Meseguer, Covadonga 2009 “The Electoral Determinants of Collective Remittances: The Mexican 3 × 1 Program for Migrants.” IBEI Working Papers 2009/22. September 1. Barcelona: Institut Barcelona d'Estudis Internacionais.Google Scholar
Aparicio, Javier, and Meseguer, Covadonga 2012 “Collective Remittances and the State: The 3 × 1 Program in Mexican Municipalities.” World Development 40 (1): 206–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo 2002 Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bada, Xóchitl 2011 “Participatory Planning Across Borders: Mexican Migrant Civic Engagement in Community Development.” Latin Americanist 55 (4): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, Heller, Patrick, and Silva, Marcelo K. 2011 Bootstrapping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Banco de México 1991-2011 Informe Anual. Mexico City: Banco de México.Google Scholar
Barraca, Steven 2005 “Devolution and the Deepening of Democracy: Explaining Outcomes of Municipal Reform in Mexico.” Journal of Latin American Studies 37 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batista, Catia, and Vicente, Pedro C. 2010 “Do Migrants Improve Governance at Home? Evidence from a Voting Experiment.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 4688, January. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Katrina 2005 “Migrant Philanthropy and Local Governance in Mexico.” In New Patterns for Mexico: Observations on Remittances, Philanthropic Giving, and Equitable Development, edited by Merz, Barbara, 99–123. Cambridge, MA: Global Equity Initiative, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Calderón, Cesar, Fajnzylber, Pablo, and López, J. Humberto 2008 “Remittances and Growth: The Role of Complementary Policies.” In Remittances and Development: Lessons from Latin America, edited by Fajnzylber, Pablo and López, J. Humberto, 335–368. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauvet, Lisa, and Mercier, Marion 2011 “Migration and Elections in Mali: Does Migration Promote Democratization in Africa?” Unpublished paper. http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/conferences/2011-EDiA/papers/758-Mercier.pdf.Google Scholar
Duquette-Rury, Lauren 2011 “The Welfare Effects of Migrant-State Coproduction: The 3 × 1 Program, Remittances and Public Goods Provision in Mexico.” Unpublished paper. CIDE, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Duquette-Rury, Lauren 2014 “Collective Remittances and Transnational Coproduction: The 3 × 1 Program for Migrants and Household Access to Public Goods in Mexico.” Studies in Comparative International Development 49 (1): 112–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duquette-Rury, Lauren, and Bada, Xochitl 2013 “Continuity and Change in Mexican Migrant Hometown Associations: Evidence from New Survey Research.” Migraciones Internacionales 7 (1): 65–99.Google Scholar
Durand, Jorge, Kandel, William, Parrado, Emilio A., and Massey, Douglas S. 1996 “International Migration and Development in Mexican Communities.” Demography 33 (2): 249–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzgerald, David Scott 2000 Negotiating Extra-territorial Citizenship: Mexican Migration and the Transnational Politics of Community. La Jolla: University of California, San Diego, Center for Comparative Immigration Studies.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan 2007 Accountability Politics: Power and Voice in Rural Mexico. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan, and Bada, Xochitl 2008 “Migrant Organization and Hometown Impacts in Rural Mexico.” Journal of Agrarian Change 8 (2-3): 431–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin 2007 “The Politics of Deepening Local Democracy: Decentralization, Party Institutionalization, and Participation.” Comparative Politics 39 (2): 141–168.Google Scholar
Goldring, Luin 2002 “The Mexican State and Transmigrant Organizations: Negotiating the Boundaries of Membership and Participation.” Latin American Research Review 37 (3): 55–99. Goodman, Gary L., and Jonathan T. HiskeyGoogle Scholar
Goldring, Luin 2008 “Exit without Leaving: Political Disengagement in High Migration Municipalities in Mexico.” Comparative Politics 40 (2): 169–188.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. 2000 Econometric Analysis. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970 Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Itzigsohn, José, and Villacrés, Daniela 2008 “Migrant Political Transnationalism and the Practice of Democracy: Dominican External Voting Rights and Salvadoran Home Town Associations.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 31 (4): 661–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapur, Devesh 2004 “Remittances: The New Development Mantra?” United Nations: G-24 Discussion Paper Series No. 29. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Levitt, Peggy 1998 “Social Remittances: Migration Driven Local-Level Forms of Cultural Diffusion.” International Migration Review 32 (4): 921–948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levitt, Peggy, and Lamba-Nieves, Deepak 2011 “Social Remittances Revisited.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin 1959 “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53 (1): 61–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcelli, Enrico A., and Cornelius, Wayne A. 2005 “Immigrant Voting in Home-Country Elections: Potential Consequences of Extending the Franchise to Expatriate Mexicans Residing in the United States.” Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 21 (2): 429–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, Covadonga, and Aparicio, Francisco Javier 2012 “Migration and Distributive Politics: The Political Economy of Mexico's 3 × 1 Program.” Latin American Politics and Society 54 (4): 147–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molinar, Juan, and Weldon, Jeffrey 1994 “Elecciones de 1988 en México: Crisis del autoritarismo.” Revista Mexicana de Sociología 54 (2): 229–262.Google Scholar
Moreno-Jaimes, Carlos 2007 “Gasto público y elecciones: Una explicación política de la asignación de los presupuestos municipales en México.” Foro Internacional 47 (2): 401–434.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo A. 1994 “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5 (1): 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo A. 1998 “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 9 (3): 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Armendáriz, Clarisa, and Crow, David 2010 “Do Migrants Remit Democracy? International Migration, Political Beliefs, and Behavior in Mexico.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (1): 111–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfutze, Tobias 2012 “Does Migration Promote Democratization? Evidence from the Mexican Transition.” Journal of Comparative Economics 40 (2): 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1994 “Social Capital and Public Affairs.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 47 (8): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichert, Joshua S. 1981 “The Migrant Syndrome: Seasonal U.S. Wage Labor and Rural Development in Central Mexico.” Human Organization 40 (1): 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera Salgado, G. 1999 “Mixtec Activism in Oaxacalifornia.” American Behavioral Scientist 42 (9): 1439–1458.Google Scholar
Romero, Mauricio 2003 Paramilitares y autodefensas, 1981–2003. Bogotá: Instituto de Estudios Políticos y Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Editorial Planeta Colombiana.Google Scholar
Rother, Stefan 2009 “Changed in Migration? Philippine Return Migrants and (Un)democratic Remittances.” European Journal of East Asian Studies 8 (2): 245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, Allison M. 2001 “Population as a Determinant of Local Outcomes under Decentralization: Illustrations from Small Municipalities in Mexico and Bolivia.” World Development 29 (8): 1373–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatini, Christopher 2003 “Latin America's Lost Illusions: Decentralization and Political Parties.” Journal of Democracy 14 (2): 138–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SEDESOL (Secretaría de Desarrollo Social) 2012 Reglas de Operación 2012. http://www.3xl.sedesol.gob.mx/documentacion/2012/ROP_3xl.pdf.Google Scholar
Simpser, Alberto, Duquette-Rury, Lauren, Company, José Antonio Hernández, and Ibarra, Juan Fernando Forthcoming “The Political Economy of Social Spending by Local Government: A Study of the 3 × 1 Program in Mexico.” Latin American Research Review.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael Peter 2003 “Transnationalism, the State, and the Extraterritorial Citizen.” Politics and Society 31 (4): 467–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael Peter, and Bakker, Matt 2008 Citizenship across Borders: The Political Transnationalism of “El Migrante.” Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert Courtney 2006 Mexican New York: Transnational Lives of New Immigrants. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stuart, James, and Kearney, Michael 1981 Causes and Effects of Agricultural Labor Migration from the Mixteca of Oaxaca to California. La Jolla, CA: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Tyburski, Michael D. 2012 “The Resource Curse Reversed? Remittances and Corruption in Mexico.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (2): 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiest, Raymond E. 1973 “Wage-Labor Migration and the Household in a Mexican Town.” Journal of Anthropological Research 29 (3): 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yashar, Deborah J. 1999 “Democracy, Indigenous Movements, and the Postliberal Challenge in Latin America.” World Politics 52 (1): 76–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar