Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:09:27.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Homogamia educacional en México y Brasil, 1970–2000: Pautas y tendencias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Albert Esteve  and
Robert McCaa
Albert Esteve
Affiliation:
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Robert McCaa
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Resumen

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

En un contexto histórico de expansión educativa, mejora de los rendimientos de la educación y aumento de la participación de la mujer en la actividad económica, este artículo examina y compara las pautas y tendencias en homogamia educativa en México y Brasil entre 1970 y 2000. Concretamente, tratamos en perspectiva temporal y comparada las siguientes cuestiones: grado y alcance de la homogamia educativa y simetría en las relaciones de género. Para ello utilizamos las muestras armonizadas de microdatos de los censos de México 1970, 1990 y 2000, y de Brasil 1970, 1980, 1991 y 2000, puestas a disposición por el proyecto IPUMS-International. Los resultados muestran un aumento de la homogamia entre las capas más instruidas y una disminución de la hipergamia femenina en ambos países. Comparativamente, la homogamia educativa es mayor en Brasil que en México, reflejo de una mayor desigualdad social, mientras que las diferencias de género son mayores en México.

Abstract

Abstract

Educational homogamy (marriage between individuals of the same level of educational attainment) in Mexico and Brazil is declining significantly with the revolution in school attainment. In Mexico, over a mere three decades, the proportions finishing primary school doubled, rising from 40 percent for the 1931–40 birth cohort to 80 percent for those born 1961–70. In Brazil, where primary school consists of only four grades (compared to Mexico's six), the completion rate rose even more dramatically from 33 to 73 percent. Nevertheless these figures also show that in both countries sizeable fractions of the youngest generation did not complete primary schooling (one-fifth in Mexico and one-fourth in Brazil). Substantial inequalities of access to schooling persist. At the upper end of the educational spectrum, for these same cohorts the percentage of Mexican husbands with some university studies increased even more dramatically, from 5.1 to 13.2 percent and, for wives, from 1.1 to 8.3 percent. In Brazil the comparable figures are 2.2 to 5.8 percent and 0.6 to 5.7 percent, respectively.

Marriage choice in both countries is strongly associated with levels of schooling completed—such as graduation from primary school, completion of basic or upper secondary, and attendance at or graduation from university. Years of schooling completed is not as salient. Thus, this research focuses on culturally significant categories rather than arbitrary number of years of schooling to compare patterns of marriage by educational attainment in the two countries. We analyze three successive ten-year birth cohorts, beginning with the 1931–40 generation, and take into consideration all marital unions, consensual as well as official. All coresident spouses in which either the husband or the wife was born between 1931 and 1970 are considered. The number of Mexican couples analyzed is 2,396,320 and Brazilian, 1,546,365. Our sources are high density integrated, anonymized census microdata samples obtained from https://www.ipums.org/international/index.html for the period 1970–2000.

A series of nine log-linear models control for the unequal frequencies of various levels of educational attainment to reveal striking changes in the propensities of marriage within and between these groups. Log-odds ratios show universally positive homogamy for both countries, all censuses, and all levels of educational attainment except for one—where either the husband or the wife began but did not complete the secondary grades. (For this group, heterogamy was the rule in both countries and increased over time.) At the higher levels of educational attainment, homogamy is most extreme and is increasing in intensity over the generations, while at the lowest levels, homogamy is lower and declining slightly. Homogamy levels are much higher in Brazil than in Mexico, a finding which demonstrates the greater social inequalities in Brazil, and the fact that for Brazilians social mobility by means of education is more difficult than for Mexicans. These findings are suggestive rather than conclusive, and call for further research taking into account variables that influence educational attainment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 56 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

*

Una versión de este trabajo fue presentada en la conferencia de la International Union for the Scientific Study of the Population, celebrada en Tours, Francia, en 2005. Esta investigación fue financiada, en parte, por fondos de National Institutes of Health Grant No. R01 HD044154–01 y National Science Foundation Grant No. SBR-9908380.

References

Referencias

Becker, Gary 1974 “A Theory of Marriage,” in Economics of the Family, ed. Schultz, T. W. (Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press), 299.Google Scholar
Birkelund, Gunn E., and Heldal, Johan 2003 “Who Marries Whom? Educational Homogamy in Norway.” Demographic Research 8 (1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, Debra L. 1998 “Marital Homogamy in the United States: The Influence of Individual and Paternal Education.” Social Science Research 27: 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteve, Albert 2005 “Tendencias en homogamia educacional en México: 1970–2000.” Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos 59: 341.Google Scholar
Esteve, Albert, and Cortina, Clara 2006 “Changes in Educational Assortative Mating in Contemporary Spain.” Demographic Research 14: 405.Google Scholar
García, Brígida, and Oliveira, Orlandina de 1994 Trabajo femenino y vida familiar en México. Ciudad de México: El Colegio de México.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpin, Brendan, and Chan, Tak Wing 2003 “Educational Homogamy in Ireland and Britain: Trends and Patterns.” British Journal of Sociology 54: 473.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, Rodolfo, and Troncoso, Eugenia 2004 “Participação da mulher no mercado de trabalho e desigualdade da renda domiciliar per capita no Brasil: 1981–2002.” Nova Economia Belo Horizonte 14 (2): 45.Google Scholar
Hout, Michael 1982 “The Association between Husbands' and Wives' Occupation in Two-earner Families.” American Journal of Sociology 87: 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografía e Estadística (IBGE) 1970 Mostra do VIII Recenseamento Geral do Brasil. Censo Demográfico 1970. Rio de Janeiro. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI), 2000 Muestra del XII Censo General de Población y Vivienda de la República de México, 2000. Aguascalientes: Ags.Google Scholar
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografía e Estadística (IBGE) 1980 Mostra do IX Recenseamento Geral do Brasil. Censo Demográfico 1980. Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografía e Estadística (IBGE) 1990 Mostra do X Recenseamento Geral do Brasil. Censo Demográfico 1991. Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografía e Estadística (IBGE) 2000 Mostra do XI Recenseamento Geral do Brasil. Censo Demográfico 2000. Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI) 1970 Muestra del IX Censo General de Población y Vivienda de la República de México, 1970. Aguascalientes, Ags.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI) 1990 Muestra del XI Censo General de Población y Vivienda de la República de México, 1990. Aguascalientes, Ags.Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert A. 1980 Religious Assortive Mating in the United States (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
Kalmijn, Matthijs 1998 “Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoke, David, and Burke, Peter J. 1980 Log Linear Models (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
Mare, Robert D. 1991 “Five Decades of Assortative Mating.” American Sociological Review 56: 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marteleto, Leticia J. 2004 “Desigualdade intergeracional de oportunidades educacionais: Una analise de matrícula e escolaridade das crianças brasileiras” (244, Belo Horizonte: UFMG/CEDEPLAR).Google Scholar
McCaa, Robert 1993 “Gender in the Melting Pot: Marital Assimilation in New York City, 1900–1980.” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 24: 2.Google Scholar
McPherson, Miller L. et al., 2001 “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mier, Marta et al., 2003 “Inequalities in Mexican Children's Schooling.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 34: 435.Google Scholar
Minnesota Population Center 2006 Integrated Public Use Microdata Series-International: Version 2.0. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Valerie K. 1988 “A Theory of Marriage Timing.” The American Journal of Sociology 94: 563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagnini, Deanna L., and Morgan, S. Philip 1990 “Intermarriage and Social Distance among U.S. Immigrants at the Turn of the Century.” American Sociological Review 96: 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Susan W., and Pederzini, Carla 1999 “Gender Differences in Education in México,” in The Economics of Gender in Mexico, Katz, E.G. and Correia, M.C., eds. Washington: The World Bank, 9.Google Scholar
Parrado, Emilio A., and Zenteno, René M. 2002 “Gender Differences in Union Formation in México: Evidence from Marital Search Models.” Journal of Marriage and Family 64: 756.Google Scholar
Qian, Zenchao 1998 “Changes in Assortative Mating: The Impact of Age and Education.” Demography 35: 279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quilodrán, Julieta 1993 “Cambios y permanencias de la nupcialidad en México.” Revista Mexicana de Sociología 55: 17.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Christine, and Mare, Robert D. 2005 “Trends in Educational Assortative Marriage from 1940 to 2003.” Demography 42: 621.Google ScholarPubMed
Smits, Jeroen 2003 “Social Closure among the Higher Educated: Trends in Educational Homogamy in 55 Countries.” Social Science Research 32: 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wajnman, Simone, and Rios-Neto, Eduardo L.G. 2001 “Women's Participation in the Labor Market in Brazil: Elements for Projecting Levels and Trends.” Brazilian Journal of Population Studies 2: 41.Google Scholar