Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:32:39.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining Patterns of Redistribution under Autocracy: The Case of Peru's Revolution from Above

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Michael Albertus
Michael Albertus*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Who benefits and who loses during redistribution under dictatorship? This article argues that expropriating powerful preexisting economic elites can serve to demonstrate a dictator or junta's loyalty to their launching organization while destroying elite rivals out of government that could potentially threaten the dictator's survival Expropriation also provides resources for buying the support of key nonelite groups that could otherwise organize destabilizing resistance. An analysis of the universe of fifteen thousand land expropriations under military rule in Peru from 1968 to 1980 demonstrates the plausibility of this argument as a case of redistributive military rule that destroyed traditional elites and empowered the military. Land was redistributed to “middle-class” rural laborers who had the greatest capacity to organize antiregime resistance if they were excluded from the reform. This finding directly challenges a core assumption of social conflict theory: that nondemocratic leaders will act as faithful agents of economic elites. A discussion of other modernizing militaries and data on large-scale expropriations of land, natural resources, and banks across Latin America from 1935 to 2008 suggests that the theory generalizes beyond Peru.

Resumen

Resumen

¿Quiénes son los beneficiarios y los perdedores de políticas de redistribución bajo dictadura? Este artículo sostiene que la expropiación de poderosas élites económicas preexistentes puede servir para demostrar la lealtad de un dictador o una junta de gobierno a su organización fundadora mientras destruye élites rivales fuera del gobierno que podrían amenazar la supervivencia del dictador. También proporciona recursos para ganar el apoyo de los grupos clave fuera de la élite que podrían organizar resistencia desestabilizadora. Un análisis del universo de 15,000 expropiaciones de tierras bajo el gobierno militar en Perú en el período 1968-1980 demuestra la plausibilidad de este argumento como un caso de un régimen militar redistributivo que destruyó las élites tradicionales y aumentó el poder de los militares. Luego se redistribuyó la tierra a los trabajadores rurales de “clase media” que tenían la mayor capacidad para organizar resistencia contra el régimen en caso de exclusión de la reforma. Esta conclusión desafía directamente una suposición fundamental de “la teoría del conflicto social”: que los líderes no democráticos actuarán como agentes fieles de las élites económicas. Una discusión de otros militares modernizadores y una compilación de datos sobre la expropiación a gran escala de la tierra, los recursos naturales, y los bancos en América Latina entre 1935 y 2008 sugiere que se puede aplicar la teoría más allá del Perú.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , 2015 , pp. 107 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

I thank the Comisión de Formalización de la Propiedad Informal (COFOPRI) in Lima, Peru, for collaborating on data gathering during fieldwork, and Katerina Nikolova for assistance with classifying expropriation decrees. I would like to thank Jim Fearon, Steve Haber, Peter Klaren, David Laitin, Beatriz Magaloni, Dan Masterson, Enrique Mayer, Cynthia McClintock, Victor Menaldo, Jonathan Rodden, Dan Slater, Paul Staniland, and three anonymous LARR reviewers for helpful comments.

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James 2001 “A Theory of Political Transitions.” American Economic Review 91 (4): 938–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James 2006 Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albertus, Michael forthcoming Autocracy and Redistribution: The Politics of Land Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertus, Michael, and Kaplan, Oliver 2013 “Land Reform as a Counterinsurgency Policy: Evidence from Colombia.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 57 (2): 198–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertus, Michael, and Menaldo, Victor 2012 “If You're Against Them You're With Us: The Effect of Expropriation on Autocratic Survival.” Comparative Political Studies 45: 973–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertus, Michael, and Menaldo, Victor 2014 “Gaming Democracy: Elite Dominance during Transition and the Prospects for Redistribution.” British Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 575–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, Ben, and Samuels, David 2010 “Inequality and Democratization.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (12): 1543–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Héctor, Béjar 1969 Peru 1965: Notes on a Guerrilla Experience. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy 2010 “Interests, Inequality, and Illusion in the Choice for Fair Elections.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (8-9): 1119–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bienen, Henry 1985 “Populist Military Regimes in West Africa.” Armed Forces and Society 11 (3): 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles 2003 Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D. 2003 The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, José María, and Alvarez, Elena 1980 Aspectos cuantativos de la reforma agrarian, 1969-1979. Lima, Peru: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret 1981 Populism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Cant, Anna 2012 “‘Land for Those Who Work It’: A Visual Analysis of Agrarian Reform Posters in Velasco's Peru.” Journal of Latin American Studies 44 (1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio, Gandhi, Jennifer, and Vreeland, James Raymond 2009 “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice 143: 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleaves, Peter, and Scurrah, Martin 1980 Agriculture, Bureaucracy, and Military Government in Peru. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine, and Malloy, James 1994 Unsettling Statecraft: Democracy and Neoliberalism in the Central Andes. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Cotler, Julio 1970 “Political Crisis and Military Populism in Peru.” Studies in Comparative International Development 6 ((5)): 95-113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, Samuel 1988 The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: West-view Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Przeworski, Adam 2006 “Cooperation, Cooptation and Rebellion under Dictatorship.” Economics and Politics 18 (1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Dennis 1977 “The Oligarchy and the Old Regime in Peru.” PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Handelman, Howard 1975 Struggle in the Andes: Peasant Political Mobilization in Peru. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunefeldt, Christine 1997 “The Rural Landscape and Changing Political Awareness: Enterprises, Agrarian Producers, and Peasant Communities, 1969-1994.” In The Peruvian Labyrinth: Polity, Society, Economy, edited by Cameron, Maxwell and Mauceri, Philip, 107–133. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968 Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kruijt, Dirk 1994 Revolution by Decree: Peru, 1968-1975. Amsterdam: Thela Publishers.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto 1977 Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory: Capitalism, Fascism, Populism. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Lapp, Nancy D. 2004 Landing Votes: Representation and Land Reform in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Robert M. 1998 Father of the Poor? Vargas and His Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malloy, James 1974 “Authoritarianism, Corporatism and Mobilization in Peru.” In The New Corporatism: Social and Political Structure in the Iberian World, edited by Pike, Frederick and Stritch, Thomas, 52–84. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Masterson, Daniel M. 1991 Militarism and Politics in Latin America: Peru from Sánchez Cerro to Sendero Luminoso. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, Enrique 2009 Ugly Stories of the Peruvian Agrarian Reform. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
McClintock, Cynthia 1981 Peasant Cooperatives and Political Change in Peru. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClintock, Cynthia 1983 “Velasco, Officers, and Citizens: The Politics of Stealth.” In The Peruvian Experiment Reconsidered, edited by McClintock, Cynthia and Lowenthal, Abraham F., 275–308. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McClintock, Cynthia 1999 “Peru: Precarious Regimes, Authoritarian and Democratic.” In Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America, edited by Diamond, Larry, Hartlyn, Jonathan, Linz, Juan, and Lipset, Seymour Martin, 308–366. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Guerra 1966 Las guerrillas en el Perú y su represión. Lima: Ministerio de Guerra.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington Jr. 1966 Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric A. 1977 Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur 1993 “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, David Scott 1973 “‘Revolution from Above’: Military Government and Popular Participation in Peru, 1968-1972.” PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Pease García, Henry 1977 El ocaso del poder oligárquico: Lucha política en la escena oficial, 1968-1975. Lima: Centro de Estudios y Promoción de Desarrollo.Google Scholar
Philip, George 1978 The Rise and Fall of the Peruvian Military Radicals, 1968-1976. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Philip, George 2013 “Nationalism and the Rise of Peru's General Velasco.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 32 (3): 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saulniers, Alfred H. 1988 Public Enterprises in Peru: Public Sector Growth and Reform. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Seligmann, Linda J. 1995 Between Reform and Revolution: Political Struggles in the Peruvian Andes, 1969-1991. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred 1978 The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2012 The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiesenhusen, William C., ed. 1989 Searching for Agrarian Reform in Latin America. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Trimberger, Ellen Kay 1978 Revolution from Above: Military Bureaucrats and Development in Japan, Turkey, Egypt, and Peru. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Turits, Richard Lee 2003 Foundations of Despotism: Peasants, the Trujillo Regime, and Modernity in Dominican History. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Verdery, Katherine 1991 National Ideology under Socialism: Identity and Cultural Politics in Ceausescu's Romania. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel 2009 “Shaping Democratic Practice and the Causes of Electoral Fraud.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar