No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
When Do First Ladies Run for Office? Lessons from Latin America
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 July 2022
Abstract
Between 1999 and 2016, 20 former first ladies ran 26 times for the presidency, vice presidency, or Congress in Latin America. Despite the growing importance of this unique type of candidate, political analysts routinely describe them as mere delegates of ex-presidents. We argue that this view has overlooked the political trajectory of former first ladies, and we claim that women with elected political experience should be regarded as politicians who use the ceremonial role of first lady as a platform to enhance their careers. We hypothesize that first ladies with elected political experience are more likely to run for office as soon as they leave the executive branch. We test our argument by analyzing the 90 former first ladies who were eligible to become candidates in 18 Latin American countries from 1999 to 2016. The results support our argument, opening a new research agenda in the study of women’s representation.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the University of Miami
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: Ignacio Arana Araya and Carolina Guerrero Valencia declare no conflict of interest.
References
Arana Araya, Ignacio. 2016. ¿Cómo evaluar a los integrantes de la élite política? Una propuesta basada en los presidentes americanos. Política 54: 219–54.Google Scholar
Arana Araya, Ignacio. 2017. Presidential Database of the Americas [v.2]. Unpublished dataset. Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Arana Araya, Ignacio. 2018. Comparative Political Elites. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, ed. Farazmand, A.. Springer, Cham. New York: Springer. 923–930.Google Scholar
Arana Araya, Ignacio, Hughes, Melanie M., and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2020. Judicial Reshuffles and Women Justices in Latin America. American Journal of Political Science 65, 2: 373–388.Google Scholar
Arroyo, Lorena. 2012. La mujer detrás del poder en República Dominicana. BBC World, May 24. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2012/05/120521_margarita_cedeno_vicepresidenta_dominicana_lav.shtml. Accessed April 20, 2018.Google Scholar
Balcácer, Juan Daniel. 2010. Primeras damas de República Dominicana. Santo Domingo: Editora Búho.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J., and Lee, Jong-Wha. 2013. A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics 104: 184–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baturo, Alexander. 2019. Continuismo in Comparison: Avoidance, Extension, and Removal of Presidential Term Limits. In The Politics of Presidential Term Limits, ed. Baturo and Robert Elgie. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 75–100.Google Scholar
Baturo, Alexander, and Gray, Julia, 2018. When Do Family Ties Matter? The Duration of Female Suffrage and Women’s Path to High Political Office. Political Research Quarterly 7, 3: 695–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, Caroline C., and Ai Camp, Roderic. 2016. Democracy, gender quotas, and political recruitment in Mexico. Politics, Groups, and Identities 4, 2: 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkman, Michael B. 1994. State Legislators in Congress: Strategic Politicians, Professional Legislatures, and the PartyNexus. American Journal of Political Science 38, 4: 1025–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchert, Jens. 2011. Individual Ambition and Institutional Opportunity: A Conceptual Approach to Political Careers in Multi-Level System. Regional and Federal Studies 21, 2: 117–40.Google Scholar
Borrelli, MaryAnne. 2002. The First Lady as Formal Advisor to the President: When East (Wing) Meets West (Wing). Women and Politics 24, 1: 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrelli, MaryAnne. 2011. The Politics of the President’s Wife. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Brandoli, Javier. 2016. Quien manda en Nicaragua es Rosario Murillo. El Mundo (Madrid), November 7. http://www.elmundo.es/internacional/2016/11/07/581f50e4e2704ea57c8b459f.html. Accessed April 20, 2018.Google Scholar
Burns, Lisa M. 2004. First Ladies as Political Women: Press Framing of Presidential Wives, 1900–2001. Ph.D. diss., University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara. 2005. Campaign Finance: Women’s Experience in the Modern Era. In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. New York: Oxford University Press. 26–40.Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara, Elder, Laurel, and Frederick, Brian. 2011. From Hillary to Michelle: Public Opinion and the Spouses of Presidential Candidates. Presidential Studies Quarterly 41, 1: 156–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Ryan E., Hartlyn, Jonathan, Hellwig, Timothy, Love, Gregory J., Martínez Gallardo, Cecilia, and Singer, Matthew M.. 2016. Executive Approval Database 1.0. http://www.executiveapproval.org. Accessed June 24, 2018.Google Scholar
Carreras, Miguel. 2017. Institutions, Governmental Performance and the Rise of Political Newcomers. European Journal of Political Research 56: 364–80.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Henrik Knutsen, Carl, Lindberg, Staffan I., Teorell, Jan, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, M. Steven Fish, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, and Ana Lührmann. 2020. V-Dem Dataset V10. Varieties of Democracy Project. https://www.v-dem.net/en/data/data-version-10/
Google Scholar
Corrales, Javier. 2008. Latin America’s Neocaudillismo: Ex-Presidents and Newcomers Running for President … and Winning. Latin American Politics and Society 50, 3: 1–35.Google Scholar
Corrales, Javier, Hernández, Gonzalo, and Penfold, Michael. 2014. Los invencibles: la reelección presidencial y los cambios constitucionales en América Latina. Revista de Ciencia Política 34, 3: 537–59.Google Scholar
Cruz Tejada, Miguel. 2010. Promueven en NY candidatura de Margarita Cedeño Para 2012. Diario Libre, June 29. https://www.diariolibre.com/noticias/promueven-en-ny-candidatura-de-margarita-cedeo-para-2012-MODL248657.Google Scholar
Dal Bó, Ernesto, Dal Bó, Pedro, and Snyder, Jason. 2009. Political Dynasties. Review of Economic Studies 76, 1: 115–42.Google Scholar
Eksterowicz, Anthony, and Roberts, Robert. 2004. First Ladies: Constitutional and Job Description Problems? PS: Political Science and Politics 32, 3: 412–33.Google Scholar
Escobar-Lemmon, María, and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. 2005. Women Ministers in Latin America Government: When, Where, and Why? American Journal of Political Science 49, 4: 829–44.Google Scholar
Escobar-Lemmon, María C., and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. 2016. Women in presidential cabinets: Power players or abundant tokens? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgibbon, Russell H. 1940. “Continuismo” in Central America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Quarterly 2: 56–74.Google Scholar
Folke, Olle, Rickne, Johanna, and Smith, Daniel M.. 2017 (Revised 2020). Gender and Dynastic Political Recruitment: Theory and Evidence. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2985230. Accessed May 15, 2020.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2004. Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office. American Journal of Political Science 48, 2: 264–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2005. To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition. American Journal of Political Science 49, 3: 642–59.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2010. If Only They’d Ask: Gender, Recruitment, and Political Ambition. Journal of Politics 72, 2: 310–26.Google Scholar
Funk, Kendall D., Hinojosa, Magda, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2017. Still Left Behind: Gender, Political Parties, and Latin America’s Pink Tide. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 24, 4: 399–424.Google Scholar
Freidenberg, Flavia. 2017. La violencia política hacia las mujeres: el problema, los debates y las propuestas para América Latina. In Cuando hacer política te cuesta la vida: Estrategias contra la violencia política contra las mujeres en América Latina, ed. Freidenberg and Gabriela del Valle Pérez. Mexico City: UNAM. 3–42.Google Scholar
Gallo, Adriana. 2008. Reelección inmediata y sucesión en clave matrimonial. Análisis del recambio presidencial argentino de 2007. Espacios Públicos 11, 23: 168–99.Google Scholar
Gordinho, Margarida Cintra. 2009. Livro de Ruth. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado/Imprensa Oficial.Google Scholar
Grondona, Mariano. 2007. El domingo, ¿hubo una elección o una reelección? La Nación, October 30. http://www.lanacion.com.ar/957723-el-domingo-hubo-una-eleccion-o-una-reeleccion.Google Scholar
Guerrero Valencia, Carolina, and Araya, Ignacio Arana. 2019. Las primeras damas como miembros de la élite política. América Latina Hoy 81: 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2000. Women’s Leadership in Latin America: Trends and Challenges. In Politics Matter: A Dialogue of Women Political Leaders. Conference report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank. 13–26.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2005. Women, Political Parties, and Electoral Systems in Latin America. In Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, A Revised Edition. Stockholm: International IDEA. 112–21.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Piscopo, Jennifer. 2014. Women in Politics and Policy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Working Paper. Brooklyn, NY: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M., Paxton, Pamela, Clayton, Amanda, and Zetterberg, Pär. 2017. Quota Adoption and Reform over Time (QAROT), 1947–2015. Computer file. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor). http://doi.org/10.3886/E100918V1.Google Scholar
Jalalzai, Farida. 2013. Shattered, Cracked, or Firmly Intact?: Women and the Executive Glass Ceiling Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joignant, Alfredo. 2014. El capital político familiar: ventajas de parentela y concentraciones de mercado en las elecciones generales chilenas de 2013. Revista de Ciencia Política 52, 2: 13–48.Google Scholar
Jones, M. P. 1997. Legislator Gender and Legislator Policy Priorities in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies and the United States House of Representatives. Policy Studies Journal 25, 4: 613–29.Google Scholar
Kyle, Jordan, and Gultchin, Limor. 2018. Populists in Power Around the World. London: Tony Blair Institute for Global Change.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and O’Brien, Diana Z.. 2012. All the President’s Men? The Appointment of Female Cabinet Ministers Worldwide. Journal of Politics 74, 3: 840–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Young-Im. 2017. From First Daughter to First Lady to First Woman President: Park Geun-Hye’s Path to the South Korean Presidency. Feminist Media Studies 17, 3: 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestas, Cherie D., Sarah Fulton, L. Sandy Maisel, and Walter J. Stone. 2006. When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House. American Political Science Review 100, 2: 195–208.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2013. Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival, and Fall. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Gurr, Ted R., and Jaggers, Keith. 2017. “Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2016.” Center for Systemic Peace. https://www.systemicpeace.org/. Accessed July 5, 2018.Google Scholar
Martin, María Elena. 2018. Carreras políticas a nivel subnacional: los matrimonios políticos como modo de construcción del poder. Revista Miríada 10, 14: 179–99.Google Scholar
McAllister, Ian. 2007. The Personalization of Politics. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, ed. Dalton, Russell J. and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 571–88.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jana, and Buice, Melissa. 2013. Latin American Attitudes Toward Women in Politics: The Influence of Elites Cues, Female Advancement, and Individual Characteristics. American Political Science Review 107, 4: 644–62.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2001. Cultural Obstacles to Equal Representation. Journal of Democracy 12, 3: 126–40.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Diana Z., and Reyes-Housholder, Catherine. 2020. Women and Executive Politics. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Executives, ed. Rudy, B. Andeweg, Elgie, Robert et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 251–72.Google Scholar
Salazar, Pérez, Carlos, Juan. 2013. El enigma de Xiomara Castro de Zelaya. BBC Mundo, November 23. http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2013/11/131123_honduras_elecciones_xiomara_castro_manuel_zelaya_jcps. Accessed April 18, 2014.Google Scholar
Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2010. Primera Dama, Prima Donna? Media Constructions of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner in Argentina. In Cracking the Highest Glass Ceiling: A Global Comparison of Women’s Campaigns for Executive Office, ed. Murray, Rainbow. Santa Barbara: Praeger. 197–202.Google Scholar
Reyes-Housholder, Catherine. 2018. Women Mobilizing Women: Candidates’ Strategies for Accesing the Presidency. Journal of Politics in Latin America 10, 1: 69–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schipani, Andres. 2014. Panama President’s Wife Sets Sights on Power. Financial Times, 2014. https://www.ft.com/content/89d551d0-d03c-11e3-8b90-00144feabdc0. Accessed May 1, 2014.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2006. Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators. American Journal of Political Science 50, 3: 570–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie, Vallejo, Agustín, and Cantú, Francisco. 2020. Gender and Family Ties in Latin American Legislatures. Politics & Gender 18, 1. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X20000288.Google Scholar
Sefchovich, Sara. 2003. La suerte de la consorte: las esposas de los gobernantes de México; historia de un olvido y relato de un fracaso. Mexico City: Océano.Google Scholar
Serrafero, Mario D. 2015. El control de la sucesión: reelección y limitaciones de elección presidencial por parentesco en América Latina. Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas Sobre as Américas 9, 1: 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle, and Michelle Heath, Roseanna. 2003. Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities than Their Male Colleagues? Women and Politics 24, 4: 77–101.Google Scholar
Thames, Frank C., and Williams, Margaret S.. 2013. Contagious Representation: Women’s Political Representation Around the World. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Van Wyk, Jo-Ansie. 2017. The First Ladies of Southern Africa: Trophies or Trailblazers? Politikon 44, 1: 157–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Robert. 1997. The First Lady Reconsidered: Presidential Partner and Political Institution. Presidential Studies Quarterly 27, 4: 805–18.Google Scholar
Winfield, Betty. 1997. The First Lady, Political Power, and the Media: Who Elected Her Anyway? In Women, Media and Politics, ed. Norris, Pippa. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 166–79.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2018. World Bank Indicators. GDP per capita growth datasets. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator. Accessed May 23, 2018.Google Scholar
Wornat, Olga. 2005. Reina Cristina: vida pública y privada de la mujer más poderosa de la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Planeta.Google Scholar
Zovatto, Daniel. 2014. Reelection, Continuity and Hyper-Presidentialism in Latin America. Blog post. IDEA International. 2014. https://www.idea.int/news-media/news/reelection-continuity-and-hyper-presidentialism-latin-america. Accepted February 21, 2014.Google Scholar
Arana Araya and Guerrero Valencia supplementary material
Appendix
File
22.6 KB