Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:57:21.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representation By Consultation? The Rise of Direct Democracy in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Monica Barczak
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most of the countries of South America experienced two notable institutional phenomena during the 1990s: the reform or rewriting of constitutions and the emergence of direct democracy mechanisms. This paper examines the latter process through a cross-national comparison. The introduction of direct democracy mechanisms is typically driven by traditionally excluded political interests. It takes two forms, both involving the failure of representative democratic institutions. In most cases, these traditionally excluded interests win control over the constitutional reform and rewriting process, although this is not a necessary condition for the emergence of direct democracy. Drawing illustrations from 12 cases of constitutional reform, this paper links arguments about direct democracy in the United States and Western Europe, institutional change, neopopulism, and the decline of the party system in Latin America.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , Fall 2001 , pp. 37 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albán Gómez, Jorge. 1996. Crisis de gobernabilidad: crisis del sistema político. In Informe Económica y Política. Quito: Instituto Latinoamericano de Investigaciones Sociales. 21–35.Google Scholar
Andolina, Robert. 1998. Conaie (and others) in the Ambiguous Spaces of Democracy: Positioning for the 1997–98 Asamblea Nacional Constituyente in Ecuador. Paper presented at the 21st International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, September 24–26.Google Scholar
Archer, Ronald P. 1995. Party Strength and Weakness in Colombia's Besieged Democracy. In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Scott, Mainwaring and Timothy, R. Scully. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 164–99.Google Scholar
Baloyra, Enrique A. 1998. Deepening Democracy with Dominant Parties and Presidentialism: The Venezuelan Regime in a Period of Turbulence. In Deepening Democracy in Latin America, ed. vonKurt, Mettenheim and James, Malloy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 38–54.Google Scholar
Banducci, Susan. 1998. Direct Legislation: When Is It Used and When Does It Pass? In Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States, ed. Shaun, Bowler, Todd, Donovan, and Caroline, J. Tolbert. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Barczak, Monica. 1998. In the Wave's Wake: Institutions in Consolidating Democracies. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Barczak, Monica. Forthcoming. Squaring Off: Executives and Legislatures in Ecuador. In Divided Government in Comparative Perspective, ed. Robert, Elgie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon. 1994. Western Europe. In Referendums Around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy, ed. David, Butler and Austin, Ranney. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Cable News Network (Cnn) Online. 1999. http:CNN.comWORLDamericas991101uruguay.election.ap November 10 (accessed November 11, 1999).Google Scholar
Carey, John M., and Matthew Sobert, Shugart. 1998. Executive Decree Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine M. 1994. Loose Parties, “Floating” Politicians, and Institutional Stress: Presidentialism in Ecuador, 1979–1988. In The Failure of Presidential Democracy The Case of Latin America, ed. Juan, J. Linz and Arturo, Valenzuela. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 254–85.Google Scholar
Córdova, Polibio. 1995. Los resultados de la consulta electoral: una comparación con eventos similares. In Los resultados de la consulta popular en el Ecuador. Quito: FLACSO. 5–13.Google Scholar
Cronin, Thomas E. 1989. Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Donovan, Todd, and Shaun, Bowler. 1998. An Overview of Direct Democracy in the American States. In Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States, ed. Bowler, Donovan, and Caroline, J. Tolbert. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Ferreira Rubio, Delia, and Matteo, Goretti. 1998. When the President Governs Alone: the Decretazo in Argentina, 1989–93. in Carey and Shugart 1998.Google Scholar
Finch, Henry. 1995. The Uruguayan Election of 1994. Electoral Studies 14, 2: 232–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamarra, Eduardo, and James, M. Malloy. 1995. The Patrimonial Dynamics of Party Politics in Bolivia. In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Scott, Mainwaring and Timothy, S. Scully. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 399–433.Google Scholar
García, Lema, Alberto, Manuel. 1994. La reforma por dentro: la dificil construcción del consenso constitucional. Buenos Aires: Planeta.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1990. Democratic Institutions as Bargains among Self-interested Politicians. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco. September.Google Scholar
Georgetown University. Political Database of the Americas. Constitutions Online. http:www.georgetown.edupdbaConstitutions.Google Scholar
González, Luis E., and Charles Guy, Gillespie. 1994. Presidentialism and Democratic Stability in Uruguay. In The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America, ed. Juan, J. Linz and Arturo, Valenzuela. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 151–78.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 1998. Democracy and Political Representation in Latin America in the 1990s: Pause, Reorganization, or Decline? In Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America, ed. Felipe, Agüero and Jeffrey, Stark. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press.Google Scholar
Hoskin, Gary. 1997. Democratization in Latin America. Latin American Research Review 32, 3: 209–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Peter. 1997. The Regime of Alfredo Stroessner. In The Transition to Democracy in Paraguay, ed. Lambert, and Andrew, Nickson. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Reports. Andean Report (RA) . 1993. RA-93–08. London: Lettres (UK).Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Reports. Andean Report (RA) . 1994. Ra-93–09.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Reports. Andean Report (RA) . 1997. Ra-97–06.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Reports. Brazil Report (RB) . 1993. RB-93–04. London: Lettres (UK).Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Reports. Southern Cone Report (RS) . 1984. RS-84–06. London: Lettres (UK).Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Reports. Southern Cone Report (RS) . 1992. Rs-92–09.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Reports. Southern Cone Report (RS) . 1993. Rs-93–01.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Reports. Southern Cone Report (RS) . 1994. Rs-94–07.Google Scholar
Latin American Weekly Report (LAWK) . 1992. LAWR-92–41. October 22. London: Lettres (UK).Google Scholar
Magleby, David B. 1994. Direct Legislation in the American States. In Referendums Around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy, ed. David, Butler and Austin, Ranney. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Martínez-Lara, Javier. 1993. The Brazilian Plebiscite of 21 April 1993. Electoral Studies 12, 4: 403–7.Google Scholar
New York times Online. 1999a. http:www.nytimes.comlibraryworldamericas112999uruguay-vote.html (accessed November 29).Google Scholar
New York times Online. 1999b. http:www.nytimes.comlibraryworldamericas12l699venezuelapolitics.html (accessed December 16).Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy 5, 1: 55–69.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Mads H. 1997. Uruguay's Constitutional Referendum, 8 December 1996. Electoral Studies 16, 4: 549–54.Google Scholar
Republic of Ecuador. National Congress. Registro oficial. 1994. No. 531: September 21. Quito: National Congress.Google Scholar
Republic of Ecuador. National Congress. Registro oficial . 1995. Suplemento. August 29. Quito: National Congress.Google Scholar
Riquelme, Marcial A., and Jorge, G. Riquelme. 1997. Political Parties. In The Transition to Democracy in Paraguay, ed. Peter, Lambert and Andrew, Nickson. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gregory D. 1996. Fujimori's 1990 Upset Victory in Peru: Electoral Rules, Contingencies, and Adaptive Strategies. Comparative Politics 28, 3: 321–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanCott, Donna Lee. 2000. The Friendly Liquidation of the Past: The Politics of Diversity in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1997. Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities. Studies in Comparative International Development 31, 1: 3–31.Google Scholar