Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:12:17.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coriolis force-assisted inertial confinement fusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2019

F. Winterberg*
Affiliation:
Carl Friedrich Gauss Academy of Science, Potsdam, Germany and Reno, Nevada, USA
*
Author for correspondence: F. Winterberg, Carl Friedrich Gauss Academy of Science, Potsdam, Germany and Reno, Nevada, USA. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

A fundamental problem for the realization of laser fusion through the implosion of a spherical target is Kidder's E−1/6 law, where E is the energy needed for ignition, proportional to the 6th power of the ratio R/R0, where R0 and R are the initial and final implosion radii, respectively. This law implies that the ignition energy is very sensitive to the ratio R0/R, or vice versa, the ratio R0/R is very insensitive to the energy input, with R0/R limited by the Rayleigh–Taylor instability. According to still classified data of the Centurion–Halite experiment at the Nevada Test Site, ignition would require an energy of ${\rm E}\simeq 50\,{\rm MJ}$, 25 times larger than the 2 MJ laser at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) reported in the New York Times. This means that even a tenfold increase from 2 to 20 MJ would only decrease the R/R0 ratio by an insignificant factor of 10−1/6 ≃ 0.7. To overcome this problem, it is proposed that the spherical target is replaced with a hollowed-out, rapidly rotating, cm-size ferromagnetic target, accelerated by a rotating traveling magnetic wave to a rotational velocity of ~1 km/s, at the limit of its tensile strength. In a rotating reference system, the general theory of relativity predicts the occurrence of negative gravitational field masses in the center of rotation, with their source located in the Coriolis force field. The density of this negative gravitational field mass can be larger than the magnitude of the positive mass density of a neutron star. The repulsive gravitational force causes the centrifugal force. For a magnetized plasma placed in the rapidly spinning, hollowed-out target chamber, this repulsive force can be balanced by the magnetic force generated by thermomagnetic currents of the Nernst effect. Such a configuration does not suffer from the Rayleigh–Taylor instability, but becomes a small magnetohydrodynamic generator, amplifying the magnetic field to values about equal to those of the Nernst effect, axially confining the plasma. By placing the spinning target in the center of a lithium vortex, the fusion neutrons absorbed in the vortex can breed tritium, and at the same time remove heat from the target chamber to sustain the Nernst effect. A hot spot is thereby produced in the target chamber, which launches a thermonuclear burn wave into a cylindrical deuterium–tritium configuration. With the stability of a rapidly rotating target greatly increased, and the range of 10 MeV electrons in the wall of the cm-size ferromagnetic target, an intense 10 MeV relativistic electron beam drawn from a 10 MJ Marx generator should be sufficient to implode the target for thermonuclear ignition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Haverkort, JW and de Blank, HJ (2012) Flow shear stabilization of rotating plasmas due to the Coriolis effect. Phys. Rev. E 86, 016411–1.Google Scholar
Hund, F (1948) Zugaenge zum Verstaendnis der allgemeinen Relativitaetstheorie. Z. F. Phys. 124, 742.Google Scholar
Kidder, RE (1998) Laser fusion: the first ten years (1962–1972). High-Power Laser Ablation, SPIE Proceedings, Philips, C. R., Vol. 3343, Bellingham, WA: SPIE, pp. 1033.Google Scholar
Landau, L and Lifshitz, E (1951) The Classical Theory of Fields. USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, p. 318.Google Scholar
Lehnert, B (1971) Rotating plasmas. Nuclear Fusion 11, 485.Google Scholar
Spitzer, L (1962) Physics of Fully Ionized Gases. New York: Interscience Publishers, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Teller, E (1969) comment made at Physics of High Energy Density meeting, Varenna, Italy.Google Scholar
Winterberg, F (1963) Experimental test for the dynamo theory of earth and stellar magnetism. Phys. Rev. 131, 29.Google Scholar
Winterberg, F (1968) The possibility of producing a dense thermonuclear plasma by an intense field emission discharge. Phys. Rev. 174, 212.Google Scholar
Winterberg, F (1977) Non-spherical implosion of a dense thermonuclear plasma. J. Plasma Phys. 18, 473.Google Scholar
Winterberg, F (2010) The Release of Thermonuclear Energy by Inertial Confinement, Ways Towards Ignition. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Winterberg, F (2014 a) The ignition of cylindrical fusion targets by multi-Megampere GeV proton beams below the Alfvén limit. Z. Naturforsch 69a, 589.Google Scholar
Winterberg, F (2014 b) To Mars in Weeks by Thermonuclear Microbomb Propulsion. J. Propulsion Power, 30, 14801484.Google Scholar