Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:43:36.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natalya I. Stolova, Cognitive Linguistics and Lexical Change: motion verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2015. Pp. 261. ISBN 978-90-272-4850-3

Review products

Natalya I. Stolova, Cognitive Linguistics and Lexical Change: motion verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2015. Pp. 261. ISBN 978-90-272-4850-3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2017

DAVID KORFHAGEN
DAVID KORFHAGEN*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 377 - 382
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

Baldi, P. (2006). Towards a history of the manner of motion parameter in Greek and Indo-European. In Cuzzolin, P. & Napoli, M. (Eds.), Fonologia e tipologia lessicale nella storia della lingua greca: Atti del VI Incontro Internazionale di Lingüística Graca, Bergamo, settembre 2005 (pp. 13–31). Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. (2010). Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Boas, H. C. (Ed.), Contrastive studies in Construction Grammar (pp. 201–236). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stolova, N. I. (2003). Verbs of motion in the Romance languages. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Stolova, N. I. (2008). From satellite-framed Latin to verb-framed Romance: Late Latin as an intermediate stage. In Wright, R. (Ed.), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif VIII: Actes du VIIIe Colloque International sur le Latin Vulgaire et Tardif, Oxford, 6–9 septembre 2006 (pp. 253–262). Hildesheim: Georg Olms; Zürich: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Stolova, N. I. (2010). La evolución del campo conceptual de movimiento: Una perspectiva cognitiva onomasiológica. In Iliescu, M., Siller-Rung-galdier, H., & Danler, P. (Eds.), Actes du XXVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes, Innsbruck, 3–8 septembre 2007, vol. III (pp. 187–195). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1975). Semantics and syntax of motion. Syntax and Semantics, 4, 181–238.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In Pick, H. L. & Acredolo, L. P. (Eds.), Spatial orientation: theory, research, and application (pp. 225–282). New York & London: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. iii: grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. vol. i: concept structuring systems; vol. ii: typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2007). Lexical typologies. In Shopen, T. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. iii: grammatical categories and the lexicon, 2nd ed. (pp. 66–168). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2009). Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In Guo, J., Liven, E., Budwig, N., Ervin-Tripp, S., Nakamura, K., & Özçalýşkan, S. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 389–402). New York & London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2012). Main verb properties. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 3(1), 1–23.Google Scholar