Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T01:18:18.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the Morphology of the Mantle Folds of the Pediveliger of Ostrea Edulis L. and their Function During Settlement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

H. J. Cranfield
H. J. Cranfield*
Affiliation:
NERC UNIT of Marine Invertebrate Biology, Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, U.K.
*
*Present address: Fisheries Research Division, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, P.O. Box 19062, Wellington, New Zealand.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Stafford (1913) rejected the view of many early workers (see Ryder, 1883, 1884; Huxley, 1883; Horst, 1886) that oyster larvae cemented themselves to the substratum with secretions of the mantle edge. He thought that the mantle margin could not be extended sufficiently to form the extensive area of cement that he found on the left valve of cemented larvae. Furthermore, he argued that the mantle could not secrete so much material in the short period that larvae took to cement. He deduced from the much reduced state of the ‘byssus gland’ in settled larvae that this gland was the source of the cement and suggested that the cement was spread over the shell by the foot. Nelson (1924), Prytherch (1934), Cole & Knight-Jones (1939) and Cranfield (19736, c) have clarified the role of the foot in cementing. Nelson (1924) also noted that cementing oyster larvae extended the mantle margin over the substratum but considered that this action spread the cement discharged by the foot and that the folds themselves did not secrete more material. The other authors, like Stafford, have dismissed or ignored any part the mantle folds might play in cementing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 1974 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bevelander, G. & Nakahara, H., 1967. An electron microscope study of the formation of the periostracum of Macrocallista maculata. Calcified Tissue Research, 1, 55–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, H. A., 1938. The fate of the larval organs in the metamorphosis of Ostrea edulis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 22, 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, H. A. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1939. Some observations and experiments on the setting behaviour of larvae of Ostrea edulis. Journal du Conseil, 14, 86–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranfield, H. J., 1973a. A study of the morphology, ultrastructure, and histochemistry of the foot of the pediveliger of Ostrea edulis. Marine Biology, 22, 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranfield, H. J., 1973b. Observations on the behaviour of the pediveliger of Ostrea edulis L. during attachment and cementing. Marine Biology, 22, 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranfield, H. J., 1973c. Observations on the function of the glands of the foot of the pediveliger of Ostrea edulis during settlement. Marine Biology, 22, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdmann, W., 1934. Untersuchungen iiber die Lebensgeschichte der Auster. Nr 5. Uber die Entwicklung und die Anatomie der ‘ ansatzreifen’ Larve von Ostrea edulis mit Bemerkungen iiber die Lebensgeschichte der Auster. Wissesnschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen der Kom-mission zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der deutschen Meere, NF. Abteilung Helgoland, 19, 1–25.Google Scholar
Foster, B. A. & Nott, J. A., 1969. Sensory structures in the opercula of the barnacle Elminius modestus. Marine Biology, 4, 340–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickman, R. W. & Grufffyd, Ll.D., 1971. The histology of the larva of Ostrea edulis during metamorphosis. In Fourth European Marine Biology Symposium (ed. Crisp, D. J.), pp. 281–294. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hillman, R. E., 1961. Formation of the periostracum in Mercenaria mercenaria. Science, New York, 134, 1754–1755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillman, R. E., 1964. The functional morphology of the fourth fold of the mantle of the northern Quahog, Mercenaria mercenaria (L.). Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society, 80, 8–12.Google Scholar
Hillman, R. E., 1968. Histochemistry of mucosubstances in the mantle of the clam Mercenaria mercenaria. I. A glycosaminoglycan in the first marginal fold. Transactions of the American Microscopal Society, 87, 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, R. E., 1969. Histochemistry of mucosubstances in the mantle of the clam Mercenaria mercenaria. II. Mucosubstances in the second marginal fold. Transactions of the American Microscopal Society, 88, 420–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horst, R., 1886. The development of the oyster (Ostrea edulis L.). Report of the Commissioner, United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries, 1884, 891–910.Google Scholar
Hunt, S., 1970. Polysaccharide-Protein Complexes in Invertebrates, 329 pp. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H., 1883. Oysters and the oyster question. English Illustrated Magazine, 1883, 46–55 and 111–121.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, S., 1964. Studies on shell formation. X. A study of the proteins of the extra-pallial fluid in some molluscan species. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 126, 414–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laverack, M. S., 1968. On the receptors of marine invertebrates. Oceanography and Marine Biology, 6, 249–324.Google Scholar
Meenakshi, V. R., Hare, P. E., Watabe, N. & Wilbur, K. M., 1969. The chemical composition of the periostracum of the molluscan shell. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 29, 611–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, J. M., 1972. Ultrastructural Studies Of Periostracum Formation In The Hard Shelled Clam Mercenaria Mercenaria (L). Tissue and Cell, 4, 311–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, T. C, 1924. The attachment of oyster larvae. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 46, 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prytherch, H. F., 1934. The role of copper in the setting, metamorphosis, and distribution of the American oyster, Ostrea virginica. Ecological Monographs, 4, 45–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, J. A., 1883. On the mode of fixation of the fry of the oyster. Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission, 2, 383–387.Google Scholar
Ryder, J. A., 1884. The metamorphosis and post-larval stages of development of the oyster. Report of the Commissioner, United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries, 1882, 779–791.Google Scholar
Satir, P., 1968. Studies on cilia. III. Further studies on the cilium tip and a ‘ sliding filament’ model of ciliary motility. Journal of Cell Biology, 39, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, J., 1913. The Canadian, Oyster, its Development Environment and Culture, 159pp. Ottawa: Commission of Conservation Canada.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H. B., 1964. Oysters: composition of the larval shell. Science, New York, 145, 155–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, J. D., Kennedy, W. J. & Hall, A., 1969. The shell structure and mineralogy of the bivalvia. Introduction. Nuculacae – Trigonacae. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Supplement 3, 1–125.Google Scholar
Tsujii, T., 1968. Studies on the mechanism of shell- and pearl-formation. X. The submicroscopic structure of the epithelial cells on the mantle of pearl oyster Pteria {Pinctada) martensii (Dunker). Report of Faculty of Fisheries, Prefectural University of Mie, 6, 41–58.Google Scholar
Wada, K., 1968. Electron microscope observations of the formation of the periostracum of Pinctada fucata. Bulletin of the National Pearl Research Laboratory, 13, 1540–1560. (In Japanese.)Google Scholar
Wada, K. & Furuhashi, T., 1971. Studies on the mineralization of the calcified tissue in molluscs. XVIII. Acid polysaccharide of mantle mucus of some marine bivalves. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries, 37, 13–17. (In Japanese.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1957. Mantle fusion in the Lamellibranchia. Pubblicazioni della Stazione zoologica di Napoli, 29, 151–171.Google Scholar