Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:59:32.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Branching dynamics of two species of arborescent demosponge: the effect of flow regime and bathymetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2002

James J. Bell
Affiliation:
School of Applied Sciences, University of Glamorgan, Treforest, Pontypridd, CF37 1DL, Wales
D.K.A. Barnes
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Society, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET
C. Shaw
Affiliation:
School of Applied Sciences, University of Glamorgan, Treforest, Pontypridd, CF37 1DL, Wales

Abstract

A series of measurements were taken from 50 random examples of the arborescent sponges Raspailia ramosa and Stelligera stuposa at a number of sites and depths at Lough Hyne, Co. Cork, Ireland. Sites ranged from fast flowing habitats, experiencing little sediment settlement, to the converse where current flow was extremely slight and sediment settlement rates high. Depth intervals at which sponges were measured ranged from 6 to 24 m. Sponges of both species varied with respect to measurements taken and the growth proportions (ratios of measurements taken). The greatest morphological differences occurred between depth and current extremes. However, at the most sedimented site (24 m) branching complexity of both species actually decreased in opposition to the proposed current models. It is discussed that simple morphologies (such as singly dichotomized sponges) may be better suited to extremely sedimented regimes being more erect than larger, more complex specimens. Other biological factors that may limit branching complexity are considered and emphasis is placed upon the possible inadequacies of community or group level models of morphological adaptation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2002 Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)