Reaction time (RT) is often used in the assessment
of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), presumably
because it reflects either information processing speed
or attentional capacity. To clarify this distinction, we
examined behavioral RT and the within-subject variability
of RT as they relate to electrophysiological measures of
attention and information processing. These include the
P300 latency, which reflects stimulus evaluation time,
P300 amplitude, which reflects attentional allocation,
and the preresponse component of the contingent negative
variation (CNV), which reflects sustained attention. We
found that the latency and variability in behavioral RT
were not correlated with the latency or variability of
the P300, suggesting that stimulus evaluation time is not
a major contributor to RT and its variability in this paradigm.
However, among normal controls, RT was related to P300
amplitude, and therefore to attentional allocation. For
the TBI subjects, it was the variability, not the speed,
of RT that was related to P300 amplitude and to the preresponse
component of the CNV. These data suggest that, while in
normal controls RT reflects attentional allocation, among
TBI subjects it is the variability in RT that is sensitive
to the ability to allocate and sustain attention. (JINS,
1997, 3, 95–107.)