Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:55:32.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The importance of word-initial phonology: Error patterns in prolonged naming efforts by aphasic patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1997

HAROLD GOODGLASS
Affiliation:
Aphasia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02130 Department of Psychology, and Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254
ARTHUR WINGFIELD
Affiliation:
Aphasia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02130 Department of Psychology, and Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254
MARY R. HYDE
Affiliation:
Aphasia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02130
JEAN BERKO GLEASON
Affiliation:
Aphasia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02130
NANCY L. BOWLES
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, and Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254
ROBERTA E. GALLAGHER
Affiliation:
Aphasia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02130

Abstract

Whether multiple conscious efforts at word search bring a subject closer to an elusive word and to eventual successful retrieval remains a subject of debate. Previous work with normal participants has shown that multiple attempts eventuating in correct retrieval are not usually associated with a systematic progression toward target word phonology in the intervening attempts. In this study we analyzed the naming errors produced by 30 aphasic patients who had received the Boston Naming Test. The analyses were designed to elucidate the characteristics of responses that led to eventual success. Our data showed that among aphasics, as with normal subjects, the presence of target-initial phonology in the subject's first response was the most important predictor of correct retrieval. Moreover, progression towards target phonology in the course of multiple attempts was unrelated to eventual correct retrieval. (JINS, 1997, 3, 128–138.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)